Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD

Nato is maybe stronger but has no moral "feature" cos it is group of various armies and interests over the world where only power is important...

Russia is weaker maybe but Russia is a country and they are responsible for what they did, Russian army is Russia itself. In nato various states can say "it is not good attack there...but NATO is NATO...it is not our fault"

This is the difference and yes I can see that :-D
And one more difference.
Russia army did not kill thousands of people in Crimea, NATO army killed thousand of people in Kosovo.

Sorry if you really believe this nonsense there is nothing to discuss about.

Look, we can just discuss about this, we all can read both opinions/arguments but we can not find one result, solution....

It is like white and black man will discuss what color is better :-)

NATO divide Yugoslavia and later Kosovo from Serbia. Dividing Yugoslavia was the primary goal cos yugoslavia was pro russian and EU can not leave such a prorussian country in EU.

EU and NATO get new markets and no competition in EU by this.

Is this reason acceptable as a reason for you ?

USA will not help them...finally good news...no war ahead..

http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_03_14/Washington-denies-Kiev-military-aid-pledging-field-rations-instead-8026/

Can you give me the website or links where I can find statistics of thousand people were killed by Nato in Kosovo ?

So you don't support NATO liberating Kosovo after Kosovo tried to become peacefully independant but you do support Russian invasion in Crimea after just a few months ?

NATO divide Yugoslavia and later Kosovo from Serbia. Dividing Yugoslavia was the primary goal cos yugoslavia was pro russian and EU can not leave such a prorussian country in EU.

EU and NATO get new markets and no competition in EU by this.

Is this reason acceptable as a reason for you ?

Didn't Yugoslave divide just because there was to much difference amongst the people living there....?And they all wanted there own independed country ? Just like the sovjiet union dived(of was that Nato's fault too:P?)

Look, I don't argue that a divided yugoslavia is better for EU but I would not say NATO divided yugoslavia in little pieces. Yugoslavia divided itself into little pieces.

I was quickly reading this topic and I wonder why isn't clear yet that in Ukraine it's happening the same thing US made 1st time in Chile in 1973, and since then a lot of other times around the world...

If you mean deprive of power Yanukovich - you're right.

If we talking about russia's soldiers in Crimea, this is the same inccident as a few years ago, when EU and UNO take a Kosovo from Serbia. And everybody were happy (of course, except Serbs)

Today Russia take a Crimea and everybody... cry.

Another manifestation of hypocrisi.

Didn't Yugoslave divide just because there was to much difference amongst the people living there....?And they all wanted there own independed country ?

So, you must divide Bosna, because is the unnatural formation wit a many Serbs and Croats. With all Banja Luka, where mainly live Serbs, and Sirjoki Brijeg, where live Croats, and many other places as city of Mostar (hal Bosnians, half Croats), etc.

If they want to do so why not ? Better then etnic cleansing like we saw in bosnia and serbia.

If we talking about russia's soldiers in Crimea, this is the same inccident as a few years ago, when EU and UNO take a Kosovo from Serbia. And everybody were happy (of course, except Serbs)

Today Russia take a Crimea and everybody... cry.

Another manifestation of hypocrisi.

Lol, I don't think you get the point.

You don't see a difference between kosovo(trying to become independant for 8 years) and Crimea(Occupied by neighbour Russians and all of the sudden there is a referrendum about independance/joing Russia)

If Crimea wants to be independant let them prove thereselves just like Kosovo did. And if you organize a referrendum do it good. And not the way it is now.

If you don't understand the difference between those 2 situations....ohh boy you are far gone.

when EU and UNO take a Kosovo from Serbia. And everybody were happy (of course, except Serbs)

Today Russia take a Crimea and everybody... cry.

really...so NATO 'took' Kosovo?
just NATO 'took East Germany and gave it to West Germany?

To all pro russian/crimea dudes.

Can you please explain to me why putin feels the need to liberate Crimea in the search for independance but dagestand and Chechnya for instance don't get theire independance from the russian empire ?

I'm just curious what's your view on that.

I'm not pro-Putin.
But I want to say only that nobody thinks it's a "liberation".

It's only business and imperialism. both sides.

I don't have a problem with business and imperialism. I do have a problem they way some are conducting it now.

I would not say NATO divided yugoslavia in little pieces.
So NATO wasn't attacking Yugoslavia, right :-DD ??
Do you want some picture or what :-DD ?

back to kosovo:
- dead 4500 people (2300 adults, 1200 KIDS!!)
- 500 000 refugees (350k serbian)

bombarded:
school buildings 430
hospitals 110
125 factories
365 culture buildings...

Gohf προς rumpil
By the way the NATO is neutral and had no interest in Kosovo.

lol dude
List of United States Army installations in Kosovo