Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
I love this 11 against respecting borders. :-D.. :-]
Russia, Syria, Sudan, Venezuela, Belarus, Cuba....
(edited)
Russia, Syria, Sudan, Venezuela, Belarus, Cuba....
(edited)
I think that defining Russia an aggressor shows you are unable to discuss those problems. (*)
(*)= I don't want to read about troops moved, lets stay honest about it.
Yeh, this makes sense. Don't call the agressor the agressor .....
Well, I don't, I prefer a pacific conclusion
No, you want to reward the agressor because that's the consequence when doing nothing. Do you think criminal behaviour will stop when it's not being punished? I think you know the answer already .....
(*)= I don't want to read about troops moved, lets stay honest about it.
Yeh, this makes sense. Don't call the agressor the agressor .....
Well, I don't, I prefer a pacific conclusion
No, you want to reward the agressor because that's the consequence when doing nothing. Do you think criminal behaviour will stop when it's not being punished? I think you know the answer already .....
I love this 11 against respecting borders. :-D.. :-]
As if the opinion of North Korea would make a difference :P
BBC.com - North Korea: Students required to get Kim Jong-un haircut
Male university students in North Korea are now required to get the same haircut as their leader Kim Jong-un, it is reported.
As if the opinion of North Korea would make a difference :P
BBC.com - North Korea: Students required to get Kim Jong-un haircut
Male university students in North Korea are now required to get the same haircut as their leader Kim Jong-un, it is reported.
cos russian cas was much more peaceful
only because ukrainian soldiers didn't open fire at them (but they had right for it) to not turn this "liberation" in to real war!
only because ukrainian soldiers didn't open fire at them (but they had right for it) to not turn this "liberation" in to real war!
had an agreement saying the maximum number of russian soldiers in Crimea is 25k
why you so sure that only 25000 and not 25001 of RF troops was in Crimea? Putin say's it?
Or maybe there was 1 military on 20 citizen?! Do You remember that on 4th March 2014 there was no Russian forces in Crimea?
or no?
why you so sure that only 25000 and not 25001 of RF troops was in Crimea? Putin say's it?
Or maybe there was 1 military on 20 citizen?! Do You remember that on 4th March 2014 there was no Russian forces in Crimea?
or no?
I am against euro without strict rules too. I will love euro with strict rules, no debts above 3%, forcing to lowering total debts and so....
yes, I know you still didn't understand what euro is.
Problem is not the euro, problems are politicians of some countries and countries at all.
in tha past year there was 10 country in recession in the whole world, 9 of them were in the euro area.
Just start making yourself some question..
yes, I know you still didn't understand what euro is.
Problem is not the euro, problems are politicians of some countries and countries at all.
in tha past year there was 10 country in recession in the whole world, 9 of them were in the euro area.
Just start making yourself some question..
I don't know how it works in Ukraine... but in Italy 2500 years ago (in Rome to be more accurate), we adopted the "Ius" that inspired the law all over the world.
Well, in Italy we have the Presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on he who declares, not on he who denies)
(edited)
Well, in Italy we have the Presumption of innocence.
The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof is on he who declares, not on he who denies)
(edited)
The Italian government is free to send the US army back to there homeland. The Ukraine government was not.
ahahahhahah.
USA won WW2, they rule.
that's reality in this world.
ahahahhahah.
USA won WW2, they rule.
that's reality in this world.
No, you want to reward the agressor because that's the consequence when doing nothing. Do you think criminal behaviour will stop when it's not being punished? I think you know the answer already .....
ok, that's what you understood.
now, i would like to hear the opinion of someone that is able to read.
ok, that's what you understood.
now, i would like to hear the opinion of someone that is able to read.
now, i would like to hear the opinion of someone that is able to read.
I can't read because I don't agree with your unrealistic ideas about the whole situation?
I can't read because I don't agree with your unrealistic ideas about the whole situation?
"Presumption of innocence" :-D ...jesus christ... seriously, read up on russian/soviet strategies...
..but first, just check.. how relevant it actually is to the man behind this international crisis, to Putin's early life.
The sad thing is, that from now on putin will most probably take all the measures he can, to destabilise Ukraine, an make life for Ukrainian government (and people) as hard as possible, even it is only.. to prove his point, that actually he should be in charge of the whole ex-soviet bloc. :-] sad.
gambit.
and back to russian "defensive" strategy:
(edited)
..but first, just check.. how relevant it actually is to the man behind this international crisis, to Putin's early life.
The sad thing is, that from now on putin will most probably take all the measures he can, to destabilise Ukraine, an make life for Ukrainian government (and people) as hard as possible, even it is only.. to prove his point, that actually he should be in charge of the whole ex-soviet bloc. :-] sad.
gambit.
and back to russian "defensive" strategy:
(edited)
Flash news for you: comunists are no longer in charge in Russia ;)
The sad thing is, that from now on putin will most probably take all the measures he can, to destabilise Ukraine, an make life for Ukrainian government (and people) as hard as possible
Did someone said "Jesus Christ"???
Excuse me, but.... helloooooo...?! What EU-US did since feb 21???
Until we don't understand that the whole story is only about to sign a deal for US-EU trade and sell the crapy-fracking gas to Europe before the bubble will breaks out, we'll continue to take one side or the other.
The sad thing is, that from now on putin will most probably take all the measures he can, to destabilise Ukraine, an make life for Ukrainian government (and people) as hard as possible
Did someone said "Jesus Christ"???
Excuse me, but.... helloooooo...?! What EU-US did since feb 21???
Until we don't understand that the whole story is only about to sign a deal for US-EU trade and sell the crapy-fracking gas to Europe before the bubble will breaks out, we'll continue to take one side or the other.
I can't read because I don't agree with your unrealistic ideas about the whole situation?
no, because you understand things as you like,
you think I prefer putin over obama or russia over UE..
you are still at the good vs bad tale
you believe there's an aggressor and a defender
how can we discuss starting with this child view?
politics and economics are something where you must discuss about what is real and possible.
i read too many times in this discussion sentences like"Russia don't have the right to.." "USA is not allowed to.." "Ukraine should not.."
well.. those are bullshits!
In politics, military and economics who can do something is allowed to do it. "International right" is the law of the stronger. Its first rule is the principle of effectiveness.
Deal with it.
If we start from here (reality) we can discuss. If not i'm not interested in.
NB: about ww2 and USA, yes, they won, they imposed an afetr war treaty to loser countries (as Italy). in those treaty there are written that Italy should accept to be a colony.
if italy try to free itself from USA.. USA has militar settlement to prevent and repress everything.
Italy to free itself (having no strenght to do it by itself) can only think to change the country to be "protected from"..
Do you see any coincidence with ukraine?
(edited)
no, because you understand things as you like,
you think I prefer putin over obama or russia over UE..
you are still at the good vs bad tale
you believe there's an aggressor and a defender
how can we discuss starting with this child view?
politics and economics are something where you must discuss about what is real and possible.
i read too many times in this discussion sentences like"Russia don't have the right to.." "USA is not allowed to.." "Ukraine should not.."
well.. those are bullshits!
In politics, military and economics who can do something is allowed to do it. "International right" is the law of the stronger. Its first rule is the principle of effectiveness.
Deal with it.
If we start from here (reality) we can discuss. If not i'm not interested in.
NB: about ww2 and USA, yes, they won, they imposed an afetr war treaty to loser countries (as Italy). in those treaty there are written that Italy should accept to be a colony.
if italy try to free itself from USA.. USA has militar settlement to prevent and repress everything.
Italy to free itself (having no strenght to do it by itself) can only think to change the country to be "protected from"..
Do you see any coincidence with ukraine?
(edited)