Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: »NEWS AROUND THE WORLD
Poland must attack Ukraine in 2015 and takeover lands.
This is good time.
I like spaghtetti and lasagne.Go to kitchen Italiano.
This is good time.
I like spaghtetti and lasagne.Go to kitchen Italiano.
Who do you think need this war? Does Russia need an instable Ukraine? For what purpose? Russia is actually about to loose his biggest market for his gas and oil. There's nothing to gain for them in this war...
This one was good :D
This one was good :D
dont forget that there is also some part which belong to slovakia "podkarpatska rus" :-D
the truth is not always funny, it is just goal of "our" media to persuade sheep... :-(
...he's the one who always pushed for peace in Ukraine. lol, :-)
Not exactly.. :-) so far Putin is either quiet for long spells, when his will is being executed - like the annexation of crimea, not a single word from Putin internationly until it was all over (only two staged idiotic Janukovic speeches), and then, later... from time to time Putin gives a speech, in which he is all positive (not exactly, but sligtly apologetic) and always very helpful to the cause of peace, off course.. always contradicting all accusations (for the internal media), unfortunately those are only words, always followed by the opposite ...actions... like "calling the russian army to withdrawal from the ukrainian border.. only, to send them right back in bigger numbers 3 od 5 days later, sending more advanced technology to the "separatists" back to the border... and escalating the conflict.. (with ukrainian army, and one malasian airplane falling) and for the external media, Putin is saying that he is actually very worried about NATO movements in Poland and Estionia... so he needs more anti-aircraft guns and tanks near Ukraine.. yeah, right... "nigga please" ;-p
Does Russia need an instable Ukraine? For what purpose?
Yes, maybe not "the people of Russia" but Putin and the ruling elite in russia do so, very much... simply to keep them in almost authoritarian power with all the assets, and more precisely to keep the people at bay, in a weakening internal economy, which is bit by bit, more in the hands of the state (Putins rulling elite) only look to the Mikhail Khodorkovsky case, which came back to the news recently.
Putin is playing a sort of double sided game, in which he has two faces:
one for the external viewer, gazprom bussines with eu and germany mainly, having fun with berlusconi.. and so on... and a completly differnent face for the internal russian market, which in the simplest (ironic) terms Putin wants to be the new tsar is making russia great, or at least "look better" not by actually getting better economically, but by making the situation worse nearby... more difficult in neighbouring countries like Ukrainie, Latvia or Belarus...(almost completly controlled), generally life more difficult for the people...
With the exception of excessive showcase city of Moscow.. Russia is literally years backward compare to western and eastern europe stlill, its the third world in smaller towns and villages, and still a massive failure and a repercussion form communism.. and state assets stealing... by the ex-kgb elite... current ruling elite... all hanging in on the gazprom... gas, in the face of the red dragon... China's quickly strengthening economy... and so on...
Russia is the big bear to eastern europe just as China is becoming the red dragon to russia... to the point, Putin with his gazprom is the only hope in russia... and its a weak thread in reality, but backup by force... of the army, its working.
If he got the eastern part of Ukraine the so called "donieck republic" it would be very beneficial to russia as not only the pipelines but also resources and all ukrainian economy is dependend on the donieck region. Ukraine would be without its engine so to speak, and russia would gain another engine... in their falling apart post-soviet truck... "mess up ukraine, to revive russia" in a nutshell, and economic terms.
You need a lot of lies, calculated force and kgb-like misleading propaganda, which is exactly what russia and Putin in command, are doing.
Evidence that a Russian unit was involved in firing the GRADs at Dobropole
(edited)
Not exactly.. :-) so far Putin is either quiet for long spells, when his will is being executed - like the annexation of crimea, not a single word from Putin internationly until it was all over (only two staged idiotic Janukovic speeches), and then, later... from time to time Putin gives a speech, in which he is all positive (not exactly, but sligtly apologetic) and always very helpful to the cause of peace, off course.. always contradicting all accusations (for the internal media), unfortunately those are only words, always followed by the opposite ...actions... like "calling the russian army to withdrawal from the ukrainian border.. only, to send them right back in bigger numbers 3 od 5 days later, sending more advanced technology to the "separatists" back to the border... and escalating the conflict.. (with ukrainian army, and one malasian airplane falling) and for the external media, Putin is saying that he is actually very worried about NATO movements in Poland and Estionia... so he needs more anti-aircraft guns and tanks near Ukraine.. yeah, right... "nigga please" ;-p
Does Russia need an instable Ukraine? For what purpose?
Yes, maybe not "the people of Russia" but Putin and the ruling elite in russia do so, very much... simply to keep them in almost authoritarian power with all the assets, and more precisely to keep the people at bay, in a weakening internal economy, which is bit by bit, more in the hands of the state (Putins rulling elite) only look to the Mikhail Khodorkovsky case, which came back to the news recently.
Putin is playing a sort of double sided game, in which he has two faces:
one for the external viewer, gazprom bussines with eu and germany mainly, having fun with berlusconi.. and so on... and a completly differnent face for the internal russian market, which in the simplest (ironic) terms Putin wants to be the new tsar is making russia great, or at least "look better" not by actually getting better economically, but by making the situation worse nearby... more difficult in neighbouring countries like Ukrainie, Latvia or Belarus...(almost completly controlled), generally life more difficult for the people...
With the exception of excessive showcase city of Moscow.. Russia is literally years backward compare to western and eastern europe stlill, its the third world in smaller towns and villages, and still a massive failure and a repercussion form communism.. and state assets stealing... by the ex-kgb elite... current ruling elite... all hanging in on the gazprom... gas, in the face of the red dragon... China's quickly strengthening economy... and so on...
Russia is the big bear to eastern europe just as China is becoming the red dragon to russia... to the point, Putin with his gazprom is the only hope in russia... and its a weak thread in reality, but backup by force... of the army, its working.
If he got the eastern part of Ukraine the so called "donieck republic" it would be very beneficial to russia as not only the pipelines but also resources and all ukrainian economy is dependend on the donieck region. Ukraine would be without its engine so to speak, and russia would gain another engine... in their falling apart post-soviet truck... "mess up ukraine, to revive russia" in a nutshell, and economic terms.
You need a lot of lies, calculated force and kgb-like misleading propaganda, which is exactly what russia and Putin in command, are doing.
Evidence that a Russian unit was involved in firing the GRADs at Dobropole
(edited)
Hmmm, I am wondering if we ever see any proof about the plane shutdown by Novorussian freedom fighters besides some Tweets...
Anyone heard anything about the info from black boxes? They are in London for few days now but still no info is coming out… maybe they "got lost"?
(edited)
Anyone heard anything about the info from black boxes? They are in London for few days now but still no info is coming out… maybe they "got lost"?
(edited)
I think black boxes are most likely irrelevant. To the extent that a surface-air missile took the plane down, the information in the boxes will at most add a more precise location at the time of impact. In particular, it won't add anything in terms of who launched the missile, so I guess mutual accusations will continue no matter what.
It can help understanding who ordered plane to change the course. Since Ukie secret service confiscated communication with the plane from the tower, there must be something they want to hide.
Today Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague issued a final judgment rendered in three interrelated arbitration proceedings initiated by the former majority shareholders of JSC "NK" YUKOS ". Decisions were based on the Energy Charter Treaty.
It's political decision and it will be overturned soon:
Of fundamental importance is the fact that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider questions put before him. The Russian Federation has not ratified the Energy Charter Treaty. In accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 45 of the Treaty the Russian Federation has not applied any provision of the Agreement is temporarily in the extent to which the provisional application of the provisions of the Constitution, the laws and regulations of the Russian Federation.
Conclusions of the Arbitration Court shall enter into a direct conflict with the findings of the two Houses of the European Court of Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights twice concluded that JSC "NK" YUKOS "committed massive tax evasion that the leadership of" NK "YUKOS" aware of violations that additional charge of almost all taxes JSC "NK" YUKOS "was lawful and lawful that JSC "NK" YUKOS "was not subject to discrimination, and that the actions of Russian authorities were not of a political nature.
It's political decision and it will be overturned soon:
Of fundamental importance is the fact that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider questions put before him. The Russian Federation has not ratified the Energy Charter Treaty. In accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 45 of the Treaty the Russian Federation has not applied any provision of the Agreement is temporarily in the extent to which the provisional application of the provisions of the Constitution, the laws and regulations of the Russian Federation.
Conclusions of the Arbitration Court shall enter into a direct conflict with the findings of the two Houses of the European Court of Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights twice concluded that JSC "NK" YUKOS "committed massive tax evasion that the leadership of" NK "YUKOS" aware of violations that additional charge of almost all taxes JSC "NK" YUKOS "was lawful and lawful that JSC "NK" YUKOS "was not subject to discrimination, and that the actions of Russian authorities were not of a political nature.
lol ...from unknown soldiers, to separatists... to terrorists and now? "Novorussian freedom fighters", love it... soon we will be talking about a Novorussian empire.. the brave people of the people, fighting those corporate facists and or american jews ...from the iluminati most probably.. and so on... :-D to be precise there is no freedom fighting there, there are terrorists with russian weapons lead by russian ex-soviet officers, who are trying to build a state within state - to weaken Ukrainie, and to be added and/or controlled by Moscow, for only russia's benefit, at the cost of lives and political chaos.
wasn't a federal soviet republic called ukraine? i can not follow further in the history...
I guess you can call them many things: separatists, rebels, guerrilla, secessionists, etc, etc...
But in which sense would they be "terrorists"?
Not every bad guy with a gun is a terrorist, such as not every guy with a disgusting opinion is a nazi. I mean, regardless on whether you think of them positively or negatively, they objectively don't fit the definition of terrorism. They may be criminals, but of a different crime.
But in which sense would they be "terrorists"?
Not every bad guy with a gun is a terrorist, such as not every guy with a disgusting opinion is a nazi. I mean, regardless on whether you think of them positively or negatively, they objectively don't fit the definition of terrorism. They may be criminals, but of a different crime.