Subject: WikiLeaks Scandal

And Spying and Investigation are 2 different things. THis is not from me but from the English dictionary. They are not even synonyms. OK?

Then you should read more thoroughly. I never said it were synonyms.

You did say it means the same thing? Thats even worse than synonyms right?

This is exactly what you said : ""Spy is just another word for unknown investigation""

And No its not ..

You see what I did there? I put another word in front of investigation, which means that I know that spying and investigating isn't the same thing.

Yes I did see the work unknown infront of it. I just did not want to tell you that its not correct grammar in the whole sentence. In other words and English teacher would have marked it with a big circle and told you its not proper English and that you did not make sense.
But I was more courteous.

and No "Spy" does not mean "Unknown Investigation"
Try again please.

For me it does. And by the way, it's irrelevant.

And no, technically, WikiLeaks didsn't steal it. However, the man working for US Foreign Department stole it ( yes, it is called stealing when you take something from your work, and you publish it ). And WikiLeaks knew this, so technically, WikiLeaks is an accomplice of information theft.


There are not so many people who consult wikileaks.
It are the media who bring the information of Wikileaks to the big public.
If I follow your reasoning all newspapers and television staions are thieves. Maybe we should close them all and allow only 1 station by country controlled by there secret services?

There are not so many people who consult wikileaks.
It are the media who bring the information of Wikileaks to the big public.
If I follow your reasoning all newspapers and television staions are thieves. Maybe we should close them all and allow only 1 station by country controlled by there secret services?

Nope, that ain't my reasoning. The media didn't publish it, they said it was published. Big difference mate ;-)

No use trying to tell someone about the sun when he/she has his head up where the sun don't shine friend. ;)

don't bother. On the belgian forum, he also said he has no issue with ban ki moon being spied on by clinton.

No use trying to tell someone about the sun when he/she has his head up where the sun don't shine friend. ;)

Good advice. I figured that out just now. I am abit slow so it took some time for me to figure he has his head in his ass.

If you'd remember what Muhajir has said before, you wouldn't bother to talk with him neither. And no, I have nog issue with that. I really don't see the difference between Ban Ki Moon - Clinton and USA - Assange ... except Assange published his info, and Clinton did not.