Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: WikiLeaks Scandal
Same remark: you missed the irony. I meant quite a big difference.
you have not get the relation i made
Ok, it dosent mind, its impossible everybody thinks in the same way.
I would be able to explain you with more elaborated arguments, but just feeling lazy about it, its just a relation between being independent brain against your statement-country
Animal Farm couldnt be published earlier because URSS was ally of England on those early years...but G. O. got the balls to write it. Maybe i am being clearer now.
I would be able to explain you with more elaborated arguments, but just feeling lazy about it, its just a relation between being independent brain against your statement-country
Animal Farm couldnt be published earlier because URSS was ally of England on those early years...but G. O. got the balls to write it. Maybe i am being clearer now.
Actually USSR was an ally of Germany when he wrote it, not England.
USSR was Germany ally until the Hitler decided to attack USSR. But in the beginning they both attacked Poland and divided it between them
USSR was Germany ally until the Hitler decided to attack USSR. But in the beginning they both attacked Poland and divided it between them
i mean, that in England in those times statement didnt want any attack to URSS and Stalin politics, and G. O. did it, not only writting it but also wanting it to beinh published ( just after IIWW i mean)
I would like someone gets the secret info from Iran and to publih it
if wikileak publish documents from Iran (or Russia, or China) he has a really high probability of accidental or violent death.
if wikileak publish documents from Iran (or Russia, or China) he has a really high probability of accidental or violent death.
I agree, but i think if he gets the documents he willl publish it and then hide.
Also now he has a % of being death....dont you think he is received a millionary offer to stop making wikileaks and that he denied because his free brain? That is what logic tells to me..just an opinion
Also now he has a % of being death....dont you think he is received a millionary offer to stop making wikileaks and that he denied because his free brain? That is what logic tells to me..just an opinion
I think he hates US more than anything else, he is not a free brain, he is one of those "leftish" who thinks that US is bad and a country like China (that is killing hundred of thousands in Africa) is good. Is the kind of people who denunce Guantanamo, but don't care about the illegal detentions and killing in lots of countries (like China or Iran), or the killing of women for no reason (more than familly honor) in some Muslim countries or the killing (or the discrimination) of homosexuals in a lot of countries.
For me he is mostly a fame seeker, who is publishing cheap gossip that doesn't help anyone and that could start wars.
For me he is mostly a fame seeker, who is publishing cheap gossip that doesn't help anyone and that could start wars.
I think he hates US more than anything else, he is not a free brain, he is one of those "leftish" who thinks that US is bad and a country like China
Thats what you think, ok, but any confirmation about his love to China? come on
Thats what you think, ok, but any confirmation about his love to China? come on
That what I think. He likes more a country over another, he may not love China, but by comparassion (because he hates US) China is good.
(edited)
(edited)
about the illegal detentions and killing in lots of countries (like China or Iran), or the killing of women for no reason (more than familly honor) in some Muslim countries or the killing (or the discrimination) of homosexuals in a lot of countries.
Thats is true...but thinking wikileaks founder support that is going way too far imo, without any proofs of that
Thats is true...but thinking wikileaks founder support that is going way too far imo, without any proofs of that
I didn't say he supports. I said that he is one of those who doesn't care (if he cares he should have hacked China as well)
PD: How do you like if someone gets your PM or better your email and publish it?
PD: How do you like if someone gets your PM or better your email and publish it?
i think he hasnt any foint in China, but he has at least one on the USA
PD: How do you like if someone gets your PM or better your email and publish it?
as i told, jurisprudency since Nixon scandal is clear, about a goverment not about a personal guy.
PD: How do you like if someone gets your PM or better your email and publish it?
as i told, jurisprudency since Nixon scandal is clear, about a goverment not about a personal guy.
Nixon create jurisprudency in Spain? I am talking how would you feel as a person. Behind every memo he publised there is a person, who have people who may look at him baddly because of something that was in the memo.
And there is a diference between Nixon and this clown. Most of what I have seen on the news is cheap gossip. All the countries use the Ambassies to spy, all the people talk behind another.
They hack to get part of the information, they could hack other places as well, but he is a attention troll, and he Guantanamo brings more attention than Daffur.
(edited)
And there is a diference between Nixon and this clown. Most of what I have seen on the news is cheap gossip. All the countries use the Ambassies to spy, all the people talk behind another.
They hack to get part of the information, they could hack other places as well, but he is a attention troll, and he Guantanamo brings more attention than Daffur.
(edited)
Nixon created jurisprudency in USA. So USA can not make any order to arrest wikileaks founder.
As something casual, now he has an Interpol arrest order because rape. i dont belive in coincidences.
edit: he didnt published Obama´s private mails but a goverment secret "mails", that is the difference
(edited)
As something casual, now he has an Interpol arrest order because rape. i dont belive in coincidences.
edit: he didnt published Obama´s private mails but a goverment secret "mails", that is the difference
(edited)