Subject: IQ test

Pattern recognition is only 1 segment of a proper IQ test. A full test would include segments on mathematics, linguistics, creativity, spatial perception and reasoning as well.

please just get a hold of a Mensa test

mathematics are included in the patterns
linguistics has never and will never be part of an IQ test
creativity has never and will never be part of an IQ test

you get the picture, I don't have to repeat myself

there are a lot of test out there that test creativity, way of thinking, personality, inclination towards humanistic or realistic sides, aptitudes and so on...

real IQ test are targeted at measuring native inteligence and cognitive connections.
they need to be understandable world-wide and to apply to any individual, independent of race/ethnicity/nationality. Only mathematics and shapes can do this, universally.

I truly hope that you understood this, as did the others. I will not re-post trying to convince you as you can actually check this yourselves and not only trust my reasoning.

Cheers

I´ve to say, you´re right...intelligence is something you could get from prenatal age until 3-5 years of your life...so you don´t need a massive mathematical apparatus to solve the each task in IQ test...the most important thing you need is LOGIC...thus on that basis, you even doesn´t need to be linguistic or creative genius...also normal guy from production line in a factory should be a genius with IQ 160...the way how he is dealing with his possibilities is based on many aspects, f.e. social, communication abilities, wealth and personal conditions...

118 (done working..)

133, some of last ones were killers....

Another IQ test that isn't reliable as well, when you all have IQ over 130 you have to join this club and do the test.

People who do the test, but don't get a high result, won't put their result here. That's a partial explanation why all the results here are quite good.

127

but for the latest i clicked random... :)

ahaha 11 points more than Serie A's winner.. i'm definitely in Champions League then ;)

166p- ?is it ewen possible

second 95, funny
(edited)

real IQ test will have more than just few pictures, so this topic isn't full with new Einstein's :) doubt that there will be a proper IQ test on the internet ...

you are smart but you don't apply yourself (cit.) :P

Well, 160 - 175 = Extraordinary genius :P

but if he got 95 second time that means he just got lucky the first time... just the fact that ur answers are different means there is no logic in your thinking...

and by the way... u shouldnt even attempt it second time as a second time result is never real, you just simply give yourself much more time to solve same problems....

and to add... those who said that they did it in 20 min but didnt get highest results, that simply means one - you were guessing and got lucky if its a high result...

I disagree. The questions are incredibly simple in the beginning. Takes a few seconds to get the answers there. It's the later questions that takes a bit longer.
So doing the test in about 20 min isn't impossible. I think I did the test in 23 minutes or so and I even took some time trying to solve the tougher questions.

its about finding the pattern.... if u find it, ur answer is correct... so if u do it in 20~ min that means u should get 100%....

if u just think that you have found something and based on that u make a 'most possible' guess, then ure just guessing.... this test is easier for guessers like you because it gives only few choices which are quite different, while in a more advanced test where there are many choices to choose from and most of them are different only a tiny bit, your guessing approach would give you nothing, because to answer correctly u have to find an exact pattern...