Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Nuclear power debate: yes or no?

2011-03-15 22:03:17
just to find better energy powerplants :-) oh, sorry we have them ;-)
2011-03-15 22:20:46
Nature provides us with enough energy sources to power our entire planet in many different ways, we just have to use those long term sollutions that are clean for ourselfs :)

Another example, media.npr.org - Harnessing the Power of the Gulf Stream. Invisable but very affective. (also in the Thames, London, timesonline.co.uk, but the blades broke because of the power of water)


(edited)
2011-03-15 22:50:04
just to find better energy powerplants :-) oh, sorry we have them ;-)

Probably we do already have everything yes, it only needs to be made more efficient and on a larger scale. And the things we don't have will be invented during the proces, just as any other successfull invention that is done, made and improved :)
2011-03-16 00:45:09
we have to go to the moon,build there 1 billion of nuclear sites, than create huge batteries and transport the energy to earth

why they don't trow in the space the consumed uranium ?

i voted for
what is happening in Japan is the most powerfull and big disaster in the world, i don't remember a country hit by an eartquake so powerfull, by a tsunami so big and at the same time to have a nuclear danger. They where prepared very well but the disastrer was too big !!!
2011-03-16 08:09:43
Slovaks have 54% of energy from nuclear PP.... and now tell me how much should my country invest and how much wind or sun or geo PP we should build if we close nuclear PP down ? (PP on water we have, a lot...)

And also one information, we dont have enough money to finish our highways, so it can not cost us more then maybe 1mil €.

And now show me real solution :-) thx :-D
2011-03-16 08:11:13
we have very high price for 1 unit of electricity now, so answer like buy electricity from French and have double bill is not acceptable answer too :-)

(and then french will be forced build one nuclear PP more, because of us )
2011-03-16 09:43:39
afaik there are 17 plants in germany in total.

They just said they could turn down all of them right now without powershortage, if they use some older coal and gas plants. That wont happen though I guess. But tomorrow there will be a new announcement by the governement. From what one can read between the lines I suspect they will take measures to implement alternative energy sources faster than planed.
2011-03-16 09:58:41
Das Moratorium :P
2011-03-16 10:04:31
Yeah really a stupid word:)
2011-03-16 10:17:43
Hmm on some other channel they say its only 12 ...
2011-03-16 11:19:44
Slovaks have 54% of energy from nuclear PP.... and now tell me how much should my country invest and how much wind or sun or geo PP we should build if we close nuclear PP down ?

There's a plan for a wind farm in the north sea with 1500 wind mills which would produce around 9 giga watts of eletric power. This is approximately the equivalent of 9 nuclear power plants.

That's probably way more than your nuclear power plants are producing right now. You can calculate the equivalent yourself ;-)
2011-03-16 11:21:16
we have here 8 nc and it produces around the 14% of energy, 14% dosent worth the risk imo
2011-03-16 11:21:30
ok and price of 1kw will be same, or not more than +10% maybe ??? !!!!

(edited)
2011-03-16 11:26:32
Wind energy reduces the energy prices (in Germany) according to studies.
2011-03-16 12:43:39
what is happening in Japan is the most powerfull and big disaster in the world, i don't remember a country hit by an eartquake so powerfull, by a tsunami so big and at the same time to have a nuclear danger. They where prepared very well but the disastrer was too big !!!

Maybe they should make you president of the IEA ;) 'I don't remember any heavy eartquake and tsunami so nuclear powerstations are save' ... :P That's the best short term argumentent I've ever heard ......... :S Problem is, in your last sentence you say exactly the opposit. Japan was the best prepared country and still everything goes wrong. Maybe your conclussion should be: even the best prepared country can't stop nature, evidence that nuclear powerstations can never be save.
2011-03-16 13:10:59
Slovaks have 54% of energy from nuclear PP.... and now tell me how much should my country invest and how much wind or sun or geo PP we should build if we close nuclear PP down ? (PP on water we have, a lot...)

And also one information, we dont have enough money to finish our highways, so it can not cost us more then maybe 1mil €.


I can't tell you this, I'm no expert ;) But if your country really would only have a few million to spend, my advise would be: move out asap :) (If you do, Germany please, not my country. We already have our share eastern Europeans ;D Germany doesn't because of protectionism, but this ends this summer so finally they also have open borders).

And now show me real solution :-) thx :-D

I think I already showed everyone that the only thing needed is the willing to change and more investments. But to many people don't like to change the way they think and do, they rather be stubborn, short-sighted and ignorant.
(edited)