Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Real Spamtopic
looking for some crappy team (even worse than mine) to play friendly with
in italy we say: there are none so deaf as those who will not hear.
PS: a drone video in a war zone controlled by someone else than your troops.. surely..
(edited)
PS: a drone video in a war zone controlled by someone else than your troops.. surely..
(edited)
Well, the problem for western mainstream medias is that they have no accurate source in Aleppo (clearly shown by journalist Eva Bartlett in the video I posted), but they still claim with assurance that the regular syrian army slaughtered syrian civilian in eastern Aleppo...
I don't get the meaning of Charles' video... You only see the result of the battle for Aleppo, after it has been liberated from the ISIS terrorists.
It would be interesting to know whom this drone used to film Aleppo belongs.
I don't get the meaning of Charles' video... You only see the result of the battle for Aleppo, after it has been liberated from the ISIS terrorists.
It would be interesting to know whom this drone used to film Aleppo belongs.
I assume that, in a war, every part don't give a *** about "human rights".
Whoever believe to separate the goods from the bads is childish, in the best case.
Whoever believe to separate the goods from the bads is childish, in the best case.
stop insulting yourself.
EDIT: trolls back on ignore, still the same bs!
(edited)
EDIT: trolls back on ignore, still the same bs!
(edited)
liberated from ISIS? check the news, and stop following fake-news. Against western main steam, lol. Dumb populist words.
(edited)
(edited)
Of course, there are no more moderate opposition members fighting against Assad. They are fighting with Assad against the terrorists now.
Populist? Thanks, I really side for the european peoples and not the european capital. That would make me populist, though it's not negative as you think.
Western mainstream medias get their international informations only from very few sources (AFP, AP, Reuters), which are very partial. I wouldn't trust those medias.
Brexit won't pass, Trump has nearly no chance to be elected, the italian referendum is only formality, they all said. You still trust them?
Populist? Thanks, I really side for the european peoples and not the european capital. That would make me populist, though it's not negative as you think.
Western mainstream medias get their international informations only from very few sources (AFP, AP, Reuters), which are very partial. I wouldn't trust those medias.
Brexit won't pass, Trump has nearly no chance to be elected, the italian referendum is only formality, they all said. You still trust them?
Polls say nothing, asking 2500 or even 25000 people what they will vote for isn't representative for a complete nation. And apparently populists and other unpredictable people are not enough represented in pre-polls. This is in their advantage because if polls would be more accurate, I don't think Brexit would have happened as way less people would have used their one and only vote as a protest-vote.
And the media and politicians are apparently too stupid to understand they spend way too much time on these populists politicians. Even if they are not in the news, the known politicians give them air time by spending time on these people in the news. If the media and politicians who are against populism would like to see less of them, they should stop spreading news about it. If something doesn't exist in the news, it almost doesn't exist in the world. Ofcourse not for real, but it does work that way with many people. Also the other way around, a few incidents with fugitive men, all fugitives are men and bad. Ofcouse also not true, but that is how many people think and can be brainwashed even further.
Western mainstream medias get their international informations only from very few sources (AFP, AP, Reuters), which are very partial. I wouldn't trust those medias.
I don't trust a grownup kid with some fake-newssite and a hidden agenda. The truth is not somewhere in between, as these guys are known for a lot of nonsense conspiracies and other bs.
(edited)
And the media and politicians are apparently too stupid to understand they spend way too much time on these populists politicians. Even if they are not in the news, the known politicians give them air time by spending time on these people in the news. If the media and politicians who are against populism would like to see less of them, they should stop spreading news about it. If something doesn't exist in the news, it almost doesn't exist in the world. Ofcourse not for real, but it does work that way with many people. Also the other way around, a few incidents with fugitive men, all fugitives are men and bad. Ofcouse also not true, but that is how many people think and can be brainwashed even further.
Western mainstream medias get their international informations only from very few sources (AFP, AP, Reuters), which are very partial. I wouldn't trust those medias.
I don't trust a grownup kid with some fake-newssite and a hidden agenda. The truth is not somewhere in between, as these guys are known for a lot of nonsense conspiracies and other bs.
(edited)
I don't trust a grownup kid with some fake-newssite and a hidden agenda. The truth is not somewhere in between, as these guys are known for a lot of nonsense conspiracies and other bs.
You mean the one you see in your mirror? Would fit though...
@Polls: not only the polls were against Trump. On 200 medias, 196 titled against Trump.
Grow up kid. Try to think before writing your posts. Maybe you won't let out only bs...
You mean the one you see in your mirror? Would fit though...
@Polls: not only the polls were against Trump. On 200 medias, 196 titled against Trump.
Grow up kid. Try to think before writing your posts. Maybe you won't let out only bs...