Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Real Spamtopic
the problem is that he is able to impede the discussion most of the times.
Anyway I suggest you all to ignore him as I did.
Anyway I suggest you all to ignore him as I did.
Another one that can't read and can't think with his head. Thanks for letting me know, forgot to put you on the ignore list also after the update.
It's again a nice list of unpleasant people with some personal problems.
It's again a nice list of unpleasant people with some personal problems.
Now only others can see who of these annoying childish trolls keep mentioning my name and make me a subject, as I can't see that nonsense anymore.
Get a live, annoying kids.
UNBELIEVABLE how some childish trolls can't let go and act normal. Attic chamber-terrorists and old forgotten bullies, very very sad people!
(edited)
Get a live, annoying kids.
UNBELIEVABLE how some childish trolls can't let go and act normal. Attic chamber-terrorists and old forgotten bullies, very very sad people!
(edited)
Get a live, annoying kids.
You mean "Get a life", dontcha?
You need to learn proper spelling...
You mean "Get a life", dontcha?
You need to learn proper spelling...
when someone use the word populism, he's trying to give a bad name to a good thing.
the fact that almost every political minorance in EU is often called populistic, is ,in my opinion, a clear sign of lack of respect and democracy.
It may be true (some rare time), but in the best scenario, it tells us that something is failing in the circuit of people-politics-media.
A blind elite is going to ignore it, but the signs are growing and growing.
When all this ideological repression will explode... what are going to be the consequences?
And who we are going to blame?
I'm blaming those that refuse to accept even to discuss, they're blinded by a religion, not a politic.
edit: LOL, I used a non-existing english word..
(edited)
the fact that almost every political minorance in EU is often called populistic, is ,in my opinion, a clear sign of lack of respect and democracy.
It may be true (some rare time), but in the best scenario, it tells us that something is failing in the circuit of people-politics-media.
A blind elite is going to ignore it, but the signs are growing and growing.
When all this ideological repression will explode... what are going to be the consequences?
And who we are going to blame?
I'm blaming those that refuse to accept even to discuss, they're blinded by a religion, not a politic.
edit: LOL, I used a non-existing english word..
(edited)
you can't handle paranoia,i know because i have it..but you can try to die for Jesus, it's the only way..i hope i am not a bad example
how are you dying for Jesus? you're just annoying people on the internet and claiming social benefits
lol
you: "but you can try to die for Jesus, it's the only way"
you 2: " better , to live for Jesus, not to die "
you: "but you can try to die for Jesus, it's the only way"
you 2: " better , to live for Jesus, not to die "
How 'funny', 100 years ago Thomas Mann warned the people for nationalism spreading in Europe which would lead to chaos. 2 world wars followed.
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism, xenophobia and protectionism, is easily made.
Again 'wir haben es nicht gewußt'???
(edited)
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism, xenophobia and protectionism, is easily made.
Again 'wir haben es nicht gewußt'???
(edited)
How 'funny', 100 years ago Thomas Mann warned the people for nationalism spreading in Europe which would lead to chaos. 2 world wars followed.
That would make in 1916, in the middle of the first world war, if my counting is correct. Could you say the correct date?
Who financed the world wars? That would be the proper question.
One big event was the creation of the american federal reserve bank in the usa in 1913 (which is neither federal, american or a bank by the way). It's an entity controlled by private banks, the us government can only choose one member out of the 13 of the fed-council, the other members are being chosen by private banks of New York.
World war one didn't not start because of nationalism, but because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1913. That's a well known fact, you should have said it yourself.
Nationalism existed long before, the two world wars had nothing to do with it...
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism and protectionism, is easily made.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
Protectionism (= being master of your borders, having full control of what comes in/goes out) is not the same as isolationism (= completly shutdown the borders, not letting anything pass the border).
Conservatism means keeping the moral and religious values as they are.
Your sentence doesn't make any sense. Maybe you could explain, what you exactly mean?
I don't know what nationalistic conservatism means, looks like nonsense to me...
Again grow up kid...
That would make in 1916, in the middle of the first world war, if my counting is correct. Could you say the correct date?
Who financed the world wars? That would be the proper question.
One big event was the creation of the american federal reserve bank in the usa in 1913 (which is neither federal, american or a bank by the way). It's an entity controlled by private banks, the us government can only choose one member out of the 13 of the fed-council, the other members are being chosen by private banks of New York.
World war one didn't not start because of nationalism, but because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1913. That's a well known fact, you should have said it yourself.
Nationalism existed long before, the two world wars had nothing to do with it...
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism and protectionism, is easily made.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
Protectionism (= being master of your borders, having full control of what comes in/goes out) is not the same as isolationism (= completly shutdown the borders, not letting anything pass the border).
Conservatism means keeping the moral and religious values as they are.
Your sentence doesn't make any sense. Maybe you could explain, what you exactly mean?
I don't know what nationalistic conservatism means, looks like nonsense to me...
Again grow up kid...