Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Real Spamtopic
How 'funny', 100 years ago Thomas Mann warned the people for nationalism spreading in Europe which would lead to chaos. 2 world wars followed.
That would make in 1916, in the middle of the first world war, if my counting is correct. Could you say the correct date?
Who financed the world wars? That would be the proper question.
One big event was the creation of the american federal reserve bank in the usa in 1913 (which is neither federal, american or a bank by the way). It's an entity controlled by private banks, the us government can only choose one member out of the 13 of the fed-council, the other members are being chosen by private banks of New York.
World war one didn't not start because of nationalism, but because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1913. That's a well known fact, you should have said it yourself.
Nationalism existed long before, the two world wars had nothing to do with it...
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism and protectionism, is easily made.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
Protectionism (= being master of your borders, having full control of what comes in/goes out) is not the same as isolationism (= completly shutdown the borders, not letting anything pass the border).
Conservatism means keeping the moral and religious values as they are.
Your sentence doesn't make any sense. Maybe you could explain, what you exactly mean?
I don't know what nationalistic conservatism means, looks like nonsense to me...
Again grow up kid...
That would make in 1916, in the middle of the first world war, if my counting is correct. Could you say the correct date?
Who financed the world wars? That would be the proper question.
One big event was the creation of the american federal reserve bank in the usa in 1913 (which is neither federal, american or a bank by the way). It's an entity controlled by private banks, the us government can only choose one member out of the 13 of the fed-council, the other members are being chosen by private banks of New York.
World war one didn't not start because of nationalism, but because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1913. That's a well known fact, you should have said it yourself.
Nationalism existed long before, the two world wars had nothing to do with it...
The link with populism, which is for many people the same as nationalistic conservatism and protectionism, is easily made.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
Protectionism (= being master of your borders, having full control of what comes in/goes out) is not the same as isolationism (= completly shutdown the borders, not letting anything pass the border).
Conservatism means keeping the moral and religious values as they are.
Your sentence doesn't make any sense. Maybe you could explain, what you exactly mean?
I don't know what nationalistic conservatism means, looks like nonsense to me...
Again grow up kid...
3 And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.
kid is good
kid is good
Cyber Harassment
Internet Defamation & Internet Trolls
https://www.ipredator.co/cyber-harassment/
Soon a couple of these looser bullies will show themselves again on the Sokker forum. Even when they read about their misplaced behaviour, I'm pretty sure they will keep going on by making it all personal with me.
(edited)
As I said, grow up kid...
Noone is bullying you here, so stop with your paranoia...
Noone is bullying you here, so stop with your paranoia...
Perhaps we can conisder it as nationalism, even the root of problem was probably in Austrian behaviour towards occupied southern civilizations. But leaving it aside, Charles proves his immaturity once again.
(edited)
(edited)
How 'funny', 100 years ago Thomas Mann warned the people for nationalism spreading in Europe which would lead to chaos. 2 world wars followed.
You mean the Thomas Mann who supported the First World War with a 600 pages book? ;)
You mean the Thomas Mann who supported the First World War with a 600 pages book? ;)
World war one didn't not start because of nationalism, but because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1913.
Lol, there is a difference between a reason and a trigger.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
The problem with so called populists is that they are a minority which somehow claims to speak for the "people". And where they are in charge they serve the big players just as well as other parties.
(edited)
Lol, there is a difference between a reason and a trigger.
Populism is pretty much the same, and used to denigrate politicians and intellectuals, that put interests of one nation above all other private interests (like capital's interests, e.g. private banks, multinational concerns, foreign countries).
The problem with so called populists is that they are a minority which somehow claims to speak for the "people". And where they are in charge they serve the big players just as well as other parties.
(edited)
That part of him I didn't read. Interesting, I will check it out. I was watching something else, and I came across that info.
But it are also different times. Hopefully in 100 years from now people will say 'dumb Neanderthals supporting xenophobia 100 years ago', unfortunately at the moment many agree with this view. But not all that is said about xenophobia in this political climate will be completely wrong in 100 years, even some words of well known idiotic will be correct, like certain politicians.
(edited)
But it are also different times. Hopefully in 100 years from now people will say 'dumb Neanderthals supporting xenophobia 100 years ago', unfortunately at the moment many agree with this view. But not all that is said about xenophobia in this political climate will be completely wrong in 100 years, even some words of well known idiotic will be correct, like certain politicians.
(edited)
The problem with so called populists is that they are a minority which somehow claims to speak for the "people".
I think the problem of "populism" is the fact that this word is used to take some different things (or different people and ideas) and close them all into a box, to define them all the same way.
I will accept the definition of populistic for SOME (identified) idea or speech. But not for a person, a politician, an ideology, a party..
When "populism " is a not-proven assumption you have a certification of use of this word for propaganda purposes, and that someone is trying to say something without bringing arguments.
And where they are in charge they serve the big players just as well as other parties.
I think here you have a point.
But still I ask,
Isn't it a normal democratic process?
And so.. how We should "fight them"?
Sure not with some more populism (empty rethoric)! but with ARGUMENTS!
I think the problem of "populism" is the fact that this word is used to take some different things (or different people and ideas) and close them all into a box, to define them all the same way.
I will accept the definition of populistic for SOME (identified) idea or speech. But not for a person, a politician, an ideology, a party..
When "populism " is a not-proven assumption you have a certification of use of this word for propaganda purposes, and that someone is trying to say something without bringing arguments.
And where they are in charge they serve the big players just as well as other parties.
I think here you have a point.
But still I ask,
Isn't it a normal democratic process?
And so.. how We should "fight them"?
Sure not with some more populism (empty rethoric)! but with ARGUMENTS!
EU Most Wanted
https://eumostwanted.eu/
First EU Most Wanted fugitive arrested thanks to December campaign
i always asked myself why i fight against world, why the world fight against me ?
the answer is this
18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.
the answer is this
18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.
The world hates you because you are boring and annoying
probably also useless since you don't work
probably also useless since you don't work