Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Real Spamtopic
Shame that you dont remember this:
As an user you are obligated to obey the following major rules. In the game it is forbidden:
- to post or present material that is designated as illegal on this family-oriented site (i.e. to present any racist, fascist, or pornographic material, presenting illegal programs or the material breaking software licenses/copyrights) or causing potential harm to another user's computer (i.e. containing viruses, harmful behavior, etc).
KUCH ....... sorry, something came up my throat from deep within :/
KUCH ....... sorry, something came up my throat from deep within :/
Please dont want to know what it was ;p
Please dont want to know what it was ;p
Some spam info :P
In 1999, Islamic art expert Wijdan Ali wrote a scholarly overview of the Muslim tradition of depicting Mohammed, which can be downloaded here in pdf format. In that essay, Ali demonstrates that the prohibition against depicting Mohammed did not arise until as late as the 16th or 17th century, despite the media's recent false claims that it has always been forbidden for Muslims to draw Mohammed. Until comparatively recently in Islamic history, it was perfectly common to show Mohammed, either in full (as revealed on this page), or with his face hidden (as shown on the next page). Even after the 17th century, up to modern times, Islamic depictions of Mohammed (especially in Shi'ite areas) continued to be produced.
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/
Islam's prophet Muhammad ibn Abd Allah. ... While some Muslims hold beliefs that it is against Islam to make images of the Prophet, others have more relaxed attitudes, and among Shia Muslims, such pictures are common, and much liked. According to Iranian informants interviewed by Ingvild Flaskerud, such portraits should not be considered "real" portraits of the prophet Muhammad. The artists make these images on the basis of conventional ideas of the character of those personages depicted, in the same way it has been done with Biblical figures in European art. The text below the image is the shahada or Profession of faith: "There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is His messenger."
http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/bilder/14b.jpg
Needless to say, the excuse cited above (that these don't count as "real" Mohammed portraits because they are not photographically accurate but instead are stylized representations based on the popular notion of what he may have looked like) is absurd, and by that definition all portraits of everyone who lived prior to the invention of photography are spurious.
Funny how Muslims today scream and kill or whatever is possible when pictures that represent Muhammed (but never really are Muhammed) are shown, eventhough it wasn't always a problem and apparently still isn't. Badly informed and forcing others to follow this false idea. Very 'funny' ....
(edited)
In 1999, Islamic art expert Wijdan Ali wrote a scholarly overview of the Muslim tradition of depicting Mohammed, which can be downloaded here in pdf format. In that essay, Ali demonstrates that the prohibition against depicting Mohammed did not arise until as late as the 16th or 17th century, despite the media's recent false claims that it has always been forbidden for Muslims to draw Mohammed. Until comparatively recently in Islamic history, it was perfectly common to show Mohammed, either in full (as revealed on this page), or with his face hidden (as shown on the next page). Even after the 17th century, up to modern times, Islamic depictions of Mohammed (especially in Shi'ite areas) continued to be produced.
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/
Islam's prophet Muhammad ibn Abd Allah. ... While some Muslims hold beliefs that it is against Islam to make images of the Prophet, others have more relaxed attitudes, and among Shia Muslims, such pictures are common, and much liked. According to Iranian informants interviewed by Ingvild Flaskerud, such portraits should not be considered "real" portraits of the prophet Muhammad. The artists make these images on the basis of conventional ideas of the character of those personages depicted, in the same way it has been done with Biblical figures in European art. The text below the image is the shahada or Profession of faith: "There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is His messenger."
http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/bilder/14b.jpg
Needless to say, the excuse cited above (that these don't count as "real" Mohammed portraits because they are not photographically accurate but instead are stylized representations based on the popular notion of what he may have looked like) is absurd, and by that definition all portraits of everyone who lived prior to the invention of photography are spurious.
Funny how Muslims today scream and kill or whatever is possible when pictures that represent Muhammed (but never really are Muhammed) are shown, eventhough it wasn't always a problem and apparently still isn't. Badly informed and forcing others to follow this false idea. Very 'funny' ....
(edited)
You have wrong about that.Because that link picture not about Muhammad picture.That picture
belong to Ali ibn Abi Talib.Plz share right information Charles. Never write fake information to here.
http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/bilder/14b.jpg
(edited)
belong to Ali ibn Abi Talib.Plz share right information Charles. Never write fake information to here.
http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/bilder/14b.jpg
(edited)
That is not the same man I have posted.
Info: http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/devotion04.html
In certain reference works and books about Islam, we may come across the claim that even if the Prophet Muhammad was represented in pictorial form in earlier times, no pictorial representation of Him is permitted in our times. This reflects the state in Sunni areas, where images of the Prophet are rare. In Shia Islam, however, the situation is different, and pictures of the Prophet are quite common.
These two pictures come from Shia Muslims in Iran and Alevis in Turkey. (Although Alevis emphatically state that they are not Shia Muslims, there are historical and other connections between the two forms of Islam.)
In both pictures, the Prophet is holding the Koran in his hand. The upper picture displays the Creed below his image: "There is no god but God, and Muhammad is His Prophet." His raised index finger in the lower picture underlines the unity of God. (Purchased in Iran and Turkey.)
Info: http://org.uib.no/popularikonografi/devotion04.html
In certain reference works and books about Islam, we may come across the claim that even if the Prophet Muhammad was represented in pictorial form in earlier times, no pictorial representation of Him is permitted in our times. This reflects the state in Sunni areas, where images of the Prophet are rare. In Shia Islam, however, the situation is different, and pictures of the Prophet are quite common.
These two pictures come from Shia Muslims in Iran and Alevis in Turkey. (Although Alevis emphatically state that they are not Shia Muslims, there are historical and other connections between the two forms of Islam.)
In both pictures, the Prophet is holding the Koran in his hand. The upper picture displays the Creed below his image: "There is no god but God, and Muhammad is His Prophet." His raised index finger in the lower picture underlines the unity of God. (Purchased in Iran and Turkey.)
man you must remember always that you are not smart
You cannot prove your decisions only 1 page mate. First you must learn about some Muslims culture and Kuran.Why they are going to Hacc or why they are keep 'fast' ( Fast time , Muslims dont eat somethink or drinking anythink in Ramazan month between morning and evening.).
That source doesnt belong to Muslims.You must show Muslims source if you want to prove your opinion to anyone. Because that opinion belong to Islam. Not you Charles...
You have not any idea about Islam or Muslims. You said only fake information which you were read thats from google or fake creation...
Islam is tolerance faith. But some separatist European and America powers want to split them and Created new mazhabs and arguments... Example ISIS. Muslims doesnt accept ISIS is muslim.Because they are killed muslim and christian or everyone...
That is not belong to Islam or Kuran. Muslims cannot to kill someone if he was not in fight or doest attack them.
Example one information i will give to you.You know maybe. Europe was Dark Age when Islam born in Arabia. Many people burned in Europe with order by Pope or Priest. But you cannot to find 1 person burned in Islam History.
(edited)
That source doesnt belong to Muslims.You must show Muslims source if you want to prove your opinion to anyone. Because that opinion belong to Islam. Not you Charles...
You have not any idea about Islam or Muslims. You said only fake information which you were read thats from google or fake creation...
Islam is tolerance faith. But some separatist European and America powers want to split them and Created new mazhabs and arguments... Example ISIS. Muslims doesnt accept ISIS is muslim.Because they are killed muslim and christian or everyone...
That is not belong to Islam or Kuran. Muslims cannot to kill someone if he was not in fight or doest attack them.
Example one information i will give to you.You know maybe. Europe was Dark Age when Islam born in Arabia. Many people burned in Europe with order by Pope or Priest. But you cannot to find 1 person burned in Islam History.
(edited)
Many people burned in Europe with order by Pope or Priest
they based on Paul teaching, i always listen only Jesus teaching, it's forbidden to kill
they based on Paul teaching, i always listen only Jesus teaching, it's forbidden to kill
hat is not belong to Islam or Kuran. Muslims cannot to kill someone if he was not in fight or doest attack them.
Example one information i will give to you.You know maybe. Europe was Dark Age when Islam born in Arabia. Many people burned in Europe with order by Pope or Priest. But you cannot to find 1 person burned in Islam History.
Read about Muslims attacking and killing Catholics in Nigeria, including bombing their churches.
Example one information i will give to you.You know maybe. Europe was Dark Age when Islam born in Arabia. Many people burned in Europe with order by Pope or Priest. But you cannot to find 1 person burned in Islam History.
Read about Muslims attacking and killing Catholics in Nigeria, including bombing their churches.
Yeah but I think that religion or political doesnt belong to Global Chat or Sokker. Thas is not right?
I was live with many culture and religion people. İ get educated about History and Religions. İ have many different faith friends and atheists but everyone didnot hurt different opinion . That is true way in humanist world. It is them choice and Let them live with that faith.Someone cannot to take decision for them. Live in Peace !
I was live with many culture and religion people. İ get educated about History and Religions. İ have many different faith friends and atheists but everyone didnot hurt different opinion . That is true way in humanist world. It is them choice and Let them live with that faith.Someone cannot to take decision for them. Live in Peace !
Thanks for proving the point that you also have no idea how he looks like and start crying when his name is used in some cartoon!!!
Here Mohammed:
No, this is Mohammed:
Or maybe this man:
Or this man:
You don't know!
And I don't care about your Dark Age nonsense, it's about the whining about a few cartoons posted on the forum that are only a representation of Muhammed. Religious extremism and terrorism prevent me from posting it on this forum, this is against my freedom of speech and freedom of comedy. Keep your religion to yourself and don't join the free world if you can't stand this!!
JE SUIS CHARLIE
(edited)
Here Mohammed:
No, this is Mohammed:
Or maybe this man:
Or this man:
You don't know!
And I don't care about your Dark Age nonsense, it's about the whining about a few cartoons posted on the forum that are only a representation of Muhammed. Religious extremism and terrorism prevent me from posting it on this forum, this is against my freedom of speech and freedom of comedy. Keep your religion to yourself and don't join the free world if you can't stand this!!
JE SUIS CHARLIE
(edited)