Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »Real Spamtopic
Still waiting for links. You point at others as if they are the problem when talking to you, but you show nothing to support any of your text.
soooooo.....
This one time I managed to sneeze 33 times in a row (took me about 5 minutes).. of course, I used a pencil to tickle my inner part of nose..
This one time I managed to sneeze 33 times in a row (took me about 5 minutes).. of course, I used a pencil to tickle my inner part of nose..
What is your problem? Alcohol??
Still waiting for links. You point at others as if they are the problem when talking to you, but you show nothing to support any of your text.
read again with me:
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said
USA and Russia/Sirya are in war. How can you trust one of them talking about the other?
IMHO you should never even READ what countries in war say about their enemies.
(edited)
Still waiting for links. You point at others as if they are the problem when talking to you, but you show nothing to support any of your text.
read again with me:
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said
USA and Russia/Sirya are in war. How can you trust one of them talking about the other?
IMHO you should never even READ what countries in war say about their enemies.
(edited)
but, but, it's 'Muricah, land of the free, home of the brave.. they wouldn't be lyin' to us now, would they? :)
Holland has Santa and his 6-8 helpers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2795267/dutch-abandon-black-pete-christmas-tradition-racism-row-replace-santa-s-sidekick-cheese-pete.html
sooo, no porn stars husbands here? still interested in a answer how do you cope when your porn star wifey gets plowed everyday, I mean, does it bother you?
Find more yourself before you judge the guy. He could be right, Syria and Russia have no problems using chlorine gas, already showed that in the past. The other idiot using that stuff was Sadam, everyone knew he was the bad guy. With Assad and Putin this is not sure yet??
HAHA, Sinterklaas is soooooo much fun. I can't get over it anymore, HAHA. You are even more funny.
And no, not Santa, Sinterklaas is december 5th, it's mainly for kids. Completely different holiday! You don't even know what you are talking about.
Lisa says
(edited)
And no, not Santa, Sinterklaas is december 5th, it's mainly for kids. Completely different holiday! You don't even know what you are talking about.
Lisa says
(edited)
Find more yourself before you judge the guy. He could be right,
as much as me and you.
Syria and Russia have no problems using chlorine gas, already showed that in the past.
said by?
I think it sound reasonable.. but still you don't get the point.
The other idiot using that stuff was Sadam, everyone knew he was the bad guy. With Assad and Putin this is not sure yet??
The last UN report stated that Saddam didn't HAD any chemical weapon.
But just by producing the fake news that he used them US was allowed to kill him, destroy Iraq and get all the oil for US's companies (before oil nationalized by Saddam).
When I hear "my enemy use chemical weapons" I intend "we shoould export democracy by bombs!"
as much as me and you.
Syria and Russia have no problems using chlorine gas, already showed that in the past.
said by?
I think it sound reasonable.. but still you don't get the point.
The other idiot using that stuff was Sadam, everyone knew he was the bad guy. With Assad and Putin this is not sure yet??
The last UN report stated that Saddam didn't HAD any chemical weapon.
But just by producing the fake news that he used them US was allowed to kill him, destroy Iraq and get all the oil for US's companies (before oil nationalized by Saddam).
When I hear "my enemy use chemical weapons" I intend "we shoould export democracy by bombs!"
as much as me and you.
Did you already looked for info that you can show me which proves otherwise? No links from you at all.
I think it sound reasonable.. but still you don't get the point.
Are you really that blind or do you see yourself as the devil's advocate (if so, it's a bad impression)? The truth is not somewhere in the middle, even when 2 sides are wrong, 1 can be way worse with using chemical weapons, bombing hospitals, and that kind of shit.
If you really mean all of this and can't see the real stuff happening without believing all that is said, written, showed, or whatever, and will all be judged by you as fake news because it doesn't suit for some reason your believes, then it can only be true if you believe it's true. That makes no sense at all.
You remind me of the Belgium guy, his posts became more and more erratic over a couple of years and at the end he became a true anti-government 'everything is suspicious' nutcase. Not being able to read between the lines anymore and see right from wrong. Became what he despised, an one-way thinker locked in his own small world in his head. And everyone outside that world was crazy .... except for him ofcourse :/
(edited)
Did you already looked for info that you can show me which proves otherwise? No links from you at all.
I think it sound reasonable.. but still you don't get the point.
Are you really that blind or do you see yourself as the devil's advocate (if so, it's a bad impression)? The truth is not somewhere in the middle, even when 2 sides are wrong, 1 can be way worse with using chemical weapons, bombing hospitals, and that kind of shit.
If you really mean all of this and can't see the real stuff happening without believing all that is said, written, showed, or whatever, and will all be judged by you as fake news because it doesn't suit for some reason your believes, then it can only be true if you believe it's true. That makes no sense at all.
You remind me of the Belgium guy, his posts became more and more erratic over a couple of years and at the end he became a true anti-government 'everything is suspicious' nutcase. Not being able to read between the lines anymore and see right from wrong. Became what he despised, an one-way thinker locked in his own small world in his head. And everyone outside that world was crazy .... except for him ofcourse :/
(edited)
Anyway, time for more important things, couch and tv :)
I think you should be a lot more careful in judgment.
And even more cautios in evaluating yourself and your ability to investigate truth and rightness.
You remind me of
you remind me of a guy that believed in the news he get for free
And even more cautios in evaluating yourself and your ability to investigate truth and rightness.
You remind me of
you remind me of a guy that believed in the news he get for free
It are not the first posts I read from you, and they have become more strange already. I think my judgement isn't that far of at all.
When I read your posts, you are a guy playing with words and twisting them so it looks like others must be wrong, without posting any links to support your words. In rl talking with people this could work very well, overruling others. But with text all can be read a number of times to see what is really said. And when you do post a link now and then, you change the headers so it already sets the tone, trying to take away free thought about the subject, color the text like you want it to be before others even read a single line.
And no, I don't believe all I see and read, but I can see when something is really messed up, what certain people are capable of, etc. That way it's not that hard to know who are the worst guys, apart from what the other side is capable of. And yes, I believe a lot more news when I know these are fact checked and rectified when the situation turns out to be different. Not nonsense made by conspiracy idiots who make home-made stories at their bedroom, based on absolutely nothing.
Edit: Believe whatever you want, I know what I trust and most of the times they are (mostly) right, because there isn't a secret agenda, just informing the people when the story is clear enough to be told. Not like RT, Sputnik, Fox News, populist pseudo-news websites, etc.
(edited)
When I read your posts, you are a guy playing with words and twisting them so it looks like others must be wrong, without posting any links to support your words. In rl talking with people this could work very well, overruling others. But with text all can be read a number of times to see what is really said. And when you do post a link now and then, you change the headers so it already sets the tone, trying to take away free thought about the subject, color the text like you want it to be before others even read a single line.
And no, I don't believe all I see and read, but I can see when something is really messed up, what certain people are capable of, etc. That way it's not that hard to know who are the worst guys, apart from what the other side is capable of. And yes, I believe a lot more news when I know these are fact checked and rectified when the situation turns out to be different. Not nonsense made by conspiracy idiots who make home-made stories at their bedroom, based on absolutely nothing.
Edit: Believe whatever you want, I know what I trust and most of the times they are (mostly) right, because there isn't a secret agenda, just informing the people when the story is clear enough to be told. Not like RT, Sputnik, Fox News, populist pseudo-news websites, etc.
(edited)