Subject: Match Challenge

In all walks of life you get a rivalry. In here this rivalry exists but when player A beats player B the age old excuses come out.

You only won cause you have been in the game longer
You only won cause you have more money than me
You only won cause of my injuries
You only won cause of my sending off.

etc etc etc

Lets have a fair challenge to once and for all see WHO is the best tactician in sokker.

Please dont get heavily involved in the symantics of it all but vote on the general concept.

For me..

You challenge a team to a winner takes all match max money 50k (pounds)
BOTH teams have the same identical players who cannot be injured OR sent off.
They play the game on a \"to be decided\" night.

Then whoever is the best tactician wins the money.

Thoughts?

So in fact, you gen a second team for one night, and the only thing you can do with it, is making a tactic and then play a match with the tactic. Am I right?

Havent been in the game long enough :P

But honestly, I have crap tactics.

If I'm right, the idea sucks ;)

Good idea tbh ;)

So you want to make it equal for both of them for one match? But the match engine is still some random imo.

maybe you can give 17 players (11 main and 5 subs) a set amount of skillpoints - say 50, each...

so its not exactly even, but you have to select skills to suit your tactics and style of play... its a lot more detailed that way, making it more interesting, but a bit more programming would be needed i think :)

i like this idea. i wuld beat every user in SK :)

Yeah I think it's a great idea that will never see the light of day

correct mate - you get 20 players and the other manager gets exactly the same 20 players. Its then up to you to pick that team and set the tactics in order to beat the other manager - winner takes the pot of money.

There are hundreds of exmples of this in games where one manager thinks they are much better than everyone else. In some circumstances they are correct but in most it is really only due to them having the superior team in the first place.

Not related to above i would love to play Dandy or Suttie with an even team to see if i can outwit them tactically. It would also show you who is best for NT duty rather than saying "your in division 2 you know nothing about tactics - the manager in the premier is clearly much better" for example.

there should be no prize though or else if you play this match you will not play your friendly therefore loosing training

no they arent your players thats the point. They are challenge teams players so you would have challenge team A vs Challenge team B who have identical players.

So i challenge you to a 100k match. You take control of Team A and i take control of Team B. Same players - different tactics who would win?

Me of course :D

Not so keen on the initial idea... However, I think the 'winner takes all' idea should be made an option in friendlies as they are now!

That gives more of an incentive to win friendlies!

I like a challenge. Bring it on rtg!

so as u are saying i can challenge any user i like on any day of the week just for money!!

your in division 2 you know nothing about tactics - the manager in the premier is clearly much better

this is how users in Moldova select the coach =((


and to be more fair, i think that the manager can RE-generate a player. for instance i a proffesinal in 3-5-2, and the generated team doesnt hav wingers, or other things, and i regenerate to have player that i want( the skill points total remains the same) so i regenerate the player till i get him with the skills i want. so it will be more handfull to a manager to make the tactic.. and prepare the team