Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [IDEA] If loosing etc Subs
- 1
Be nice as its already there in some form to be able to bring on a sub if loosing (say more better going foward than defensive winger) or if winning bringing more of a defesnive 1 on.
Like with the additional tactic :
51' losing by at least 1 goal
Change tactics for Additional tactic
66' drawing or losing
Change tactics for Additional tactic
67' always
Daniel Corcodel on position 6
76' winning by at least 1 goal
Change tactics for Basic tactic
81' drawing or losing
Change tactics for Additional tactic
But have Daniel Corcodel coming on if winning by at least 1 goal plus all the other variables.
Like with the additional tactic :
51' losing by at least 1 goal
Change tactics for Additional tactic
66' drawing or losing
Change tactics for Additional tactic
67' always
Daniel Corcodel on position 6
76' winning by at least 1 goal
Change tactics for Basic tactic
81' drawing or losing
Change tactics for Additional tactic
But have Daniel Corcodel coming on if winning by at least 1 goal plus all the other variables.
Not sure if that is true, because the stronger team will also get more options/slots. For example, if the stronger team is winning and has more options he can make so many changes to make sure the weaker team has even less chance of winning.
With the number of options/slots we have right now you have to make decisions, with more options/slots you can make them all, which makes it all a bit easier, I think specially for stronger teams.
edit text
(edited)
With the number of options/slots we have right now you have to make decisions, with more options/slots you can make them all, which makes it all a bit easier, I think specially for stronger teams.
edit text
(edited)
lol.... finding it harder and harder to find arguments for why not just making things?? :P
A bit confused? I think you are posting to the wrong person. I'm always asking for changes and telling the DEVs they should do more to make Sokker more atractive. Ask any staff member as they can see staff forum and ask all those who have test server access ....
You may not like me (EDIT: or better, you don't and that's fine by me because I don't like you either), but that's no reason to post this false accusation. I look at things from different sides and comment the idea from my point of view, you just seem to look at who is posting and comment me.
(edited)
You may not like me (EDIT: or better, you don't and that's fine by me because I don't like you either), but that's no reason to post this false accusation. I look at things from different sides and comment the idea from my point of view, you just seem to look at who is posting and comment me.
(edited)
- 1