Subject: »[IDEA] +3 Additional Tactic

I think another 3 additional tactic's are needed, because i want to attack more if i am loosing and defend more if i am winning later on in the game, as it stands i can either start with 1 and end with the other with no in between [neither attacking or defending] we would need 3 to do this.

Having 3 more additional tactic's means you can have a very Attacking or a quite Attacking tactic, very Defensive or quite Defensive tactic.

Also a 4 more Tactics swap's would be needed, & 1 more conditional order wouldn't go amiss.
(edited)

I think that is a superb idea.

If only we can change tactics at any time (not just at set times and conditions) during the live games, but having more options is a good alternative.

If only we can change tactics at any time (not just at set times and conditions) during the live games

How could you do that? Anything that forces you to be watching the game live or be in disadvantage against your opponent is obviously against the spirit of this game. Allowing managers to influence a match once it has started is something that never will, and never should happen.

and we go off topi again...

this is why the thread is not read by admins...its simple...you like the idea say +1 you don't -1... you have a improved version say it...you have a different idea create you own topic...keep it simple ...we should not have a debate over every damn thing.

+1 from me...

Lol... then make a voting, not a topic.. :) ofc. we can have debate, that is what forum is about.. of you want simple +1 or -1, make voting...

Also, reason is not debate things are not done, and you know that.. :)
(edited)

This is Sokker, not Google+

I don't no how to make it a voting subject adaca if indeed i can or i would like very much too, can you? and change the title to + 3 additional tactic's please.

I changed the title to ''+3 additional tactics''.

This thread can't change into poll thread now.

It must be re-create with 2 choices for voting (agree - disagree).


(edited)

Agree, but I think 1 more would be enough.

@geddin matches are not really live...

And the moment we have more tactic swaps, more additional tactics and more slots, another manager will start a new topic asking for more tactic swaps, more additional tactics and more slots because it's never enough ;)

There is no real reason why it should be limmited.
But, even if you let that go. Maybe it is never enough, that does not mean Greg should not do this :)

1 extra tactic is realy not enough. you should have options to anticipate on different things in a match, that is the job of a manager.

(But never ever real time, because of what Don Enzo said.)

The more, the better, although the benefits are decreasing. The biggest impact was on going from 0 to 1 additional tactic. Adding a second additional tactic won't be as big an improvement, but still huge: for example, we could have a defensive plan in case we are winning and an offensive plan in case we are losing, instead of choosing one or the other. Or a "tie-breaker" tactic and a truly "desperate" tactic, so we can control the degree of risk we assume when trying to unlock a match. Etc. It would also be easier to compensate red cards with tactic changes as opposed to repositioning.
As we increase the number, there's always going to be a match in which you make use of them, but not as many.
Bottom line, I'd welcome any extra tactic and extra conditional order slot the devs are willing to give us :P

yup, and please give us options to get other tactics in cases of red cards. Not only move within the tactic, but i want another tactic if my striker gets red. (i'd love to change orders too, but that's another case :) And not to forget options when a player gets injured, i want the new player sometimes on another position, because there is a reason he did not start in the game :P )
(edited)

Not only move within the tactic, but i want another tactic if my striker gets red.

That is already possible, although you have to use up your only extra tactic for that ;)
(edited)

I tought that did not work, does it?

Maybe i can make a workaround then... thanks.
But it still is not enough of course ;) I need to bring in a new striker for (let say) a def, and i want to play him on that striker spot. Like a real coach would do.

To be honest, I have never tried it, I only saw it was available. It's hard to test, though, as you need a red card in the exact player you designated, and who knows when will that happen :P