Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[IDEA] +3 Additional Tactic
To be honest, I have never tried it, I only saw it was available. It's hard to test, though, as you need a red card in the exact player you designated, and who knows when will that happen :P
If i remember correctly it was tested and busted... but not 100% sure i remember it correctly :)
Could someone set up a vote post for this like you Charles?
So there is not more 'ideas' on this subject in the future, make it 3 additional tactics & 4 extra tactic swaps, then there's hardly need for anymore ;)
I think the most important is more additional Tactics & more Tactic Swaps to go with them.
How can anyone vote no to this? it gives us more control over the game and appears more 'live'
(edited)
So there is not more 'ideas' on this subject in the future, make it 3 additional tactics & 4 extra tactic swaps, then there's hardly need for anymore ;)
I think the most important is more additional Tactics & more Tactic Swaps to go with them.
How can anyone vote no to this? it gives us more control over the game and appears more 'live'
(edited)
I don't have Plus so I can't make polls.
And I don't think this idea will have priority, also not from the community. A lot of ideas are suggested, and some should be implemented asap, while other ideas can wait.
One of the first priorities is to make sure new managers return after first login.
And I don't think this idea will have priority, also not from the community. A lot of ideas are suggested, and some should be implemented asap, while other ideas can wait.
One of the first priorities is to make sure new managers return after first login.
How can anyone vote no to this? it gives us more control over the game and appears more 'live'
And no one will, I'm sure. That's the issue: this isn't being held back by users disliking it, but rather by devs not willing to undertake the project (maybe for good reasons -i.e., it is more complex than it seems-, maybe not).
I mean, I think the benefits of this idea are well established in everyone's eye, the remaining question is what is the cost to them. In other words: since the benefit is undeniable, the only reason not to have it already that I can think of is they are not willing to do the work it would take.
And no one will, I'm sure. That's the issue: this isn't being held back by users disliking it, but rather by devs not willing to undertake the project (maybe for good reasons -i.e., it is more complex than it seems-, maybe not).
I mean, I think the benefits of this idea are well established in everyone's eye, the remaining question is what is the cost to them. In other words: since the benefit is undeniable, the only reason not to have it already that I can think of is they are not willing to do the work it would take.
It's because they thought the game was something else like you can play matches everyday or something like 'normal' football manager games , i mean surely this is dated to a new user but to me it's what i want out of a football manager game.
+1 with 3 tactics, but there is another problem. Orders. Even with one one additional, you need to change your structure and need many conditional subs and repeat condition at different times. Not enough room for that. And we can't change player order position too.
So ok, live change could fix this, but certainly most users like me dont want to be stick on computer for a specific time.
(edited)
So ok, live change could fix this, but certainly most users like me dont want to be stick on computer for a specific time.
(edited)
And live is not real live. The match is played in less than a second. When you start the match, the result is allready known.
So live changes are not possible.
The whole ME should be rewritten on a total different way. (There is a real benefit in it, because there could be fixed a real lot 'mistakes' that there are now :P But the chance for a total rewritten ME.....)
(edited)
So live changes are not possible.
The whole ME should be rewritten on a total different way. (There is a real benefit in it, because there could be fixed a real lot 'mistakes' that there are now :P But the chance for a total rewritten ME.....)
(edited)
Yes live is never gonna be live like we no it, but 3 additional tactcis would make it seem live & as live as could be and it would be perfect to me...
(edited)
(edited)
Yes the off sides are bonkers if opponent touches before you it will still be deemed offside, which is of course wrong as we all no.
Actually not, if you come from offside and interfers play, it is offside, is not about who touches the ball, when...
Dribbling the ball out of play when player has formidable (11) Tech or over and midway in form, is not very technical at all now is it.
Well, 11 tech is actually very low for a midfielder....
Actually not, if you come from offside and interfers play, it is offside, is not about who touches the ball, when...
Dribbling the ball out of play when player has formidable (11) Tech or over and midway in form, is not very technical at all now is it.
Well, 11 tech is actually very low for a midfielder....
lol :D
is not about who touches the ball, when...
Indeed, as we all know ... :P
is not about who touches the ball, when...
Indeed, as we all know ... :P
Lol do you understand in my country the word formidable = intimidating, forbidding, redoubtable, daunting, alarming, frightening, terrifying, petrifying, horrifying, chilling, disturbing, disquieting, dreadful, brooding, awesome, fearsome, ominous, foreboding, sinister, menacing, threatening, dangerous;
i give up on anything else in bugs/ideas it's all just totally pointless.
(edited)
i give up on anything else in bugs/ideas it's all just totally pointless.
(edited)
You are wrong...
Taken from fifa´s official offside rules in the chapter about active play (situations that are also considered as offsides):
Active Play
“
Interfering with play” means
Playing or touching the ball passed or touched by a
team-mate.
Active Play
“
I
nterfering with an opponent” means:
Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to
play the ball. For example, by clearly obstructing the
goalkeeper’s line of vision or movement.
Making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of
the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.
Active Play
“
Gaining an advantage by being in that position”
means:
Playing a ball that rebounds to him off a post or
crossbar, having previously been in an offside position.
Playing a ball, that rebounds to him off an opponent,
having previously been in an offside position.
Plz, have your facts straigt...
Taken from fifa´s official offside rules in the chapter about active play (situations that are also considered as offsides):
Active Play
“
Interfering with play” means
Playing or touching the ball passed or touched by a
team-mate.
Active Play
“
I
nterfering with an opponent” means:
Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to
play the ball. For example, by clearly obstructing the
goalkeeper’s line of vision or movement.
Making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of
the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.
Active Play
“
Gaining an advantage by being in that position”
means:
Playing a ball that rebounds to him off a post or
crossbar, having previously been in an offside position.
Playing a ball, that rebounds to him off an opponent,
having previously been in an offside position.
Plz, have your facts straigt...
It isnt.... nothing wrong in that statement... there are many other ways to be offside then just touching the ball... as just stated with FACTS
oh so there's nothing wrong with offsides in this game is that what you are saying?