Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: GoalKeeper Bug

  • 1
2021-09-13 09:30:05
Bryan Robson to All
The answer is proabably 15 = bug , players cannot use hands allah Maradona! so if straight at him unless he drops it which top top keepers in thsi game seem to do alot = another bug, they are not actually bugs they are somone writing this as part of the game which is even worse!

In real life medicore keepers practice these things daily and only mess up 1 in 20 , top top keepers more like 1 in 100
2021-09-13 10:05:41
thats where laser pens come into play :(
2021-09-13 12:59:32
The answer, the proper answer is 0 to 20. It just depends on situation, luck etc. The better gk the better result in long term but still possible to have 0 out of 20. 20 is just very, very small sample.

Comparison with real life keepers is also wrong approach, because this is sokker and due to how the game works, not everything have to look exactly how it looks irl.
2021-09-13 17:29:27
No, but it should be worth having a superdivine keeper. If they make noob mistakes every match, then the engine isn't balansed. As well as players with divine playmaking and passing, kicking the ball straight to an opponent within your own box! I'm sorry, but game or not... These noob flaws for such skilled players and keepers are what destroys the engine. I have NT matches where 4x divine players make noob flaws with a 20% ratio...
When they are in poor form, I can understand that, but magical+ form... nope!
2021-09-15 19:45:29
The answer, the proper answer is 0 to 20. It just depends on situation, luck etc. The better gk the better result in long term but still possible to have 0 out of 20

+1
2021-09-20 18:54:35
I think people is confused with the visualization of the ME... I don't think it is a ME bug actually, this situation looks like a bad animation, imo.
2021-10-18 12:36:38
What? your saying a top keeper in top form gets a high ball lobbed into him possibly never out of 20 times? then he wouldn't ever be a goal keeper again not even for Southend United!
2021-10-19 16:49:21
I'm not saying anything like that... did you even read my comment?

I said: I think it LOOKS like that due to a BAD ANIMATION, not because it is a ME bug. "high ball lobbed" is not even in the reports once, so I think that for the ME is not really a high ball lobbed, even though (due to the animation) we watch it just like that.

Just keep out the visualization for a moment... you are watching the ME calculation and a player made a tremendous shot from way too far, the keeper couldn't stop it completely and then the rebound is capitalized by the striker next to him... now, you have to show that, so you are going to animate the situation and it could be a Roberto Carlos headshot ball (which would be something nicer and realistic animation) OR "a high ball lobbed" one with fluffy-butterfingers keepers... go figure which one you are looking at.

Again, my thinking is: it is a visualization problem, rather than a Engine issue.
(edited)
  • 1