Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [Idea] Minimum % success for shots

  • 1
2025-06-29 21:47:01
Mark Stark to All
Greetings,

As we know, the chance tò score a goal Is ridicolously unreal in sokker, so often we see shot missed from few meters, gk saving every shots and many matches results doesn't reflect final stats and field happenings.

So I propose a simple solution, a minimum chance to score, calculated Just by shot distance, then only the rest percentage as usual.

So could work like that:

- Shots from nside the small box - min 75% goal
- Shots within 11 meters - Min 50% goal
- Shots within box limiti - Min 25% goal
- Shots within 30 meters - Min 10% goal

Easy, then.

This minimum would help for more realism in matches at every level, also granting less frustration to users, with matches results finally more adeguate to final stats, moreover match happenings and shots quality.

Thanks in Advance for any opinion.
(edited)
2025-06-29 21:51:55
if you like to compare it with eeal life, then please have a look at the stats.

You might be surprised, how well shots on goal and finally scored goals match with real life stats.
(edited)
2025-06-29 22:11:25
No it's not a matter of stats by themselves.

It's a matter of shots quality by first, often an headsdhots from outside the box has more chance than a shot from few meters from goal. Even from top skilled strikers, with gk saving every shots even from close range.

That's the problem i propose to solve.
2025-06-29 23:55:44
Yeah, the problem comes with two many 1v1 chances created by the game engine, which they dont know how to alter, so if it were made as you propose, matches would have tons of goals... there Are tactics where 1v1's Are higher percentage success, but at the cost of headers chance lowered.... and also tactics where you have both options depending what striker gets the ball.... this is good to use if you have slow and fast strikers partners.. write my inbox if you want more info on the matter
2025-06-30 10:44:52
Obviously your suggestion will never be implemented.

Sokker lives off convenient outcomes for friends, whose agreed-upon answer to all such convenient outcomes is "random."

Your suggestion would make Sokker a fairer and more consistent game, and then you wouldn't be able to respond with "random" to everything anymore.
2025-06-30 11:54:58
Less random?

Have lool here and support my idea!
2025-06-30 12:30:22
I'm in favor of less random, but not any of your 3 options :p
  • 1