Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: IDEAS Realisation
It hould go up really fast. When I moved up the league, it only went up maybe 10k Aus but by half way through the season, i was p another 40k from that.
Edit: A good way that it could be measured, is on that "rank" or "rating" that is hidden. That way in higher leagues you get more sponser money quicker if you win, or lose less if you lose (because other teams are higher rank too)
(edited)
Edit: A good way that it could be measured, is on that "rank" or "rating" that is hidden. That way in higher leagues you get more sponser money quicker if you win, or lose less if you lose (because other teams are higher rank too)
(edited)
Well it depends how good you are at higher league. I see a lot of teams with big and a lot of changes in sponsormoney.. I personally think that it should be really hard to get lower sponsormoney than in lower leagues. So people will not miss or lose their relegationmatches on purpose. Of course a minimum sponsormoney would help there ^^
One important idea isn't on the list yet.
"[IDEA] Offensive/Defensive tactics" 2007-02-12 18:02
Although many post writers has misunderstood the idea, although I told them several times it's about who has the BALL in position.
It's about using two positionings (=tactics) depending of who has the BALL. As IRL you want very different positions, when your team has the ball in position or not. As it is now the tactics needs to be done as compromises of theese very different situations, and then both becomes rather bad.
This needs rather much more capacity, so I expect it NOT to be done soon, but when there is server capacity enough sometimes in the future, then will this improove Sokker ME a lot.
"[IDEA] Offensive/Defensive tactics" 2007-02-12 18:02
Although many post writers has misunderstood the idea, although I told them several times it's about who has the BALL in position.
It's about using two positionings (=tactics) depending of who has the BALL. As IRL you want very different positions, when your team has the ball in position or not. As it is now the tactics needs to be done as compromises of theese very different situations, and then both becomes rather bad.
This needs rather much more capacity, so I expect it NOT to be done soon, but when there is server capacity enough sometimes in the future, then will this improove Sokker ME a lot.
hmm on polish forum also was speculations about this and I dont remember exactly what someone writes about this but as I remember match is generated in 2 sec so its not possible to do this I think ;(
but of course I add this idea to list.
I write to greg (creator) and we must wait for his answer
but of course I add this idea to list.
I write to greg (creator) and we must wait for his answer
I like the idea to play with fire, or play cool. Something like HT but with their game engine it was pretty meaningless. Here, in Sokker, it could mean a lot.
As I wrote I don't expect it to be added before there is much more server capacity, but then I expect the devs are clever enough to add it, because it's a huge improovement but rather easy to add ;-) (I mean after the server capacity is expanded.)
As i dont speak Polish, can someone mail Greg the idea about releasing International players as soon as teams turn bot?
Idea iis on list.
I sended meil to greg I see that he read this he didnt delete him but I dont know why he didnt rewrite to me
I sended meil to greg I see that he read this he didnt delete him but I dont know why he didnt rewrite to me
I'm sure he can but i tend to ramble in details and i thought it stood more chance if it was in Polish.
Idea iis on list.
I just looked and that wasn't my idea. You've linked to the one that says bot teams should be replaced. Thats not going to happen so can you edit that to say "Replacing bot teams.
I can see i'm going to have to create my own thread.
I just looked and that wasn't my idea. You've linked to the one that says bot teams should be replaced. Thats not going to happen so can you edit that to say "Replacing bot teams.
I can see i'm going to have to create my own thread.
but read all this topic there is also about NT players :)
The topic you linked to on the front page is a bad idea and stands absolutely no chance of being passed. If Greg sees that you might as well forget about changing anything to do with the national players in bot teams.
I'm going to write it out myself.
I'm going to write it out myself.