Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] News
lol 6 other players have higher pace and defender and better side skills on that, and probably better tactical discipline.
list them
and remember I need use more than two players as DEF.
and remember I need use more than two players as DEF.
Well, like I said, there's 6 (actually I looked at it again and there's 7)
Jared Holah
Duncan Findlay
Simon Williams
Matt Gilbert
Duncan Vettori
Daniel Dawkins
Gary Edwards
Also a few more that are better than Woods:
Stuart Urlovic
David Watts
John Campfens (lower defender but much higher pace)
Jared Holah
Duncan Findlay
Simon Williams
Matt Gilbert
Duncan Vettori
Daniel Dawkins
Gary Edwards
Also a few more that are better than Woods:
Stuart Urlovic
David Watts
John Campfens (lower defender but much higher pace)
And 1 of those players is injured, 3 with bad from...that leaves 6.
Woods and Webster are DIVINE FORM, but now Webster injuried ;(
Jared Holah, INJURIED now, unfortunally
Duncan Findlay, incredible FORM its 4 levels under divine.
Simon Williams, first team 1
Matt Gilbert, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
Duncan Vettori, first team 2
Daniel Dawkins, fenomenal its 5 levels...
Gary Edwards, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
Stuart Urlovic, first team 3
David Watts, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
John Campfens (lower defender but much higher pace)
I think that the obviously needed of they on the NT.
Jared Holah, INJURIED now, unfortunally
Duncan Findlay, incredible FORM its 4 levels under divine.
Simon Williams, first team 1
Matt Gilbert, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
Duncan Vettori, first team 2
Daniel Dawkins, fenomenal its 5 levels...
Gary Edwards, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
Stuart Urlovic, first team 3
David Watts, too old, the skills probably its not the same that I have on .xls
John Campfens (lower defender but much higher pace)
I think that the obviously needed of they on the NT.
You're very picky for someone with a relatively low amount of players to choose from.
lol you wont use Findlay because he's in incredible form? Incredible form is good...plus his defender if 4 levels higher than webster and 3 higher than woods. Also if you got the skills for Edwards, Watts and Gilber at the beginning of the season I doubt they've gone down very muchif they have.
edit: Okay I looked at the players again...2 of the 3 you said were too old were 2 that i mentioned that had bad form, the other one (Watts) you have his skills from at least the beginning of the season so I doubt they've gone down much, if at all. Dawkins and Findlay have outstanding and incredible form...maybe for poland that would be too low, but this isn't poland, and that is good form for me at least.
(edited)
edit: Okay I looked at the players again...2 of the 3 you said were too old were 2 that i mentioned that had bad form, the other one (Watts) you have his skills from at least the beginning of the season so I doubt they've gone down much, if at all. Dawkins and Findlay have outstanding and incredible form...maybe for poland that would be too low, but this isn't poland, and that is good form for me at least.
(edited)
look the start lineup today and you will see the needed of woods.
Kiwi for NT coach next time methinks.
At least that way, if he plays up, one us can go knocking on his door :-)
At least that way, if he plays up, one us can go knocking on his door :-)
Who forgot to put washing powder in the machine? Lots of dirty laundry.
2-0 against Croatia, 7th of the world seems a good match for me. And 5 shoots to NZ that with more luck can be better...
look the start lineup today and you will see the needed of woods.
What do you mean? You played 4 of the defenders I mentioned that are better than him, plus one that I didn't even know of who is better than him lol
What do you mean? You played 4 of the defenders I mentioned that are better than him, plus one that I didn't even know of who is better than him lol
I dunno about luck.
You're whinging about not being able to choose a defender, and then completely excusing our attack?
You're whinging about not being able to choose a defender, and then completely excusing our attack?
I used them because it was what I had. But Woods and Webster, if I had them, will better the NZ defence.
New Zealand
* 1. K. Taylor
* 2. G. Stanton (a ghost, Woods fix here)
* 3. D. Vettori
* 4. S. Urlovic
* 5. S. Williams
* 6. D. Findlay
* 7. W. Souter
* (70' B. Kingi)
* 8. M. Kelly (too old and bad form, Findlay here and Webster on sideback)
* 9. K. Brunton
* 10. T. Stanton
* 11. J. Filer
* (70' J. Priorie)
* 12. D. Oorschot
* 13. D. Dawkins (about the reserve, form weak on that week)
* 16. L. Souter
New Zealand
* 1. K. Taylor
* 2. G. Stanton (a ghost, Woods fix here)
* 3. D. Vettori
* 4. S. Urlovic
* 5. S. Williams
* 6. D. Findlay
* 7. W. Souter
* (70' B. Kingi)
* 8. M. Kelly (too old and bad form, Findlay here and Webster on sideback)
* 9. K. Brunton
* 10. T. Stanton
* 11. J. Filer
* (70' J. Priorie)
* 12. D. Oorschot
* 13. D. Dawkins (about the reserve, form weak on that week)
* 16. L. Souter