Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] News
We lose our first match :(
New Zealand - Česká republika 1:3
I feel unlucky because the two mistakes beginning the match, I would wanted to see the match again without that. Anyway the result was deserved, a match with a lot of fails for the hand of the strikers too.
We 'begin' our competition next match against Andorra, I think he is the team to beat for stay on the WC next season.
New Zealand - Česká republika 1:3
I feel unlucky because the two mistakes beginning the match, I would wanted to see the match again without that. Anyway the result was deserved, a match with a lot of fails for the hand of the strikers too.
We 'begin' our competition next match against Andorra, I think he is the team to beat for stay on the WC next season.
ins't this a problem...i see your match and I can say what you play bad because:
your midfielders have a very defensive game, and so you lose middle ground, so less offensive moments.
And you need to place one striker in the off-side and one a little retired, and first striker put with a bigest pace.
Then midfielders placed a line don't have do effective play.
These are you most important mistakes at this tactic.
your midfielders have a very defensive game, and so you lose middle ground, so less offensive moments.
And you need to place one striker in the off-side and one a little retired, and first striker put with a bigest pace.
Then midfielders placed a line don't have do effective play.
These are you most important mistakes at this tactic.
I don't need your teaching. I have to tell you this isn't the way to win the elections ;)
(edited)
(edited)
you a silly...a want to help, but you...
ooo yes you are the bigest tactician, i forgot this.
I don't write you...I'll write after every match your mistakes in the tactic... for the elections see who they voted.
ooo yes you are the bigest tactician, i forgot this.
I don't write you...I'll write after every match your mistakes in the tactic... for the elections see who they voted.
and watch my match too please :) can you say me where ı do mistake.. U21 NZ .. ty ..
Go and seek your dog...and find with him your mistake at U21 NZ...lol
good game :), good luck in next matches ;-)
(edited)
(edited)
congratulations for the mach. good luck for you too
man I feel you're a noob.
your midfielders have a very defensive game, and so you lose middle ground
look at the report:
New Zealand Česká republika
debut Tactics lentilky
52% Possession 48%
50% Play in the half 50%
8 Shots 16
6 Fouls 7
1 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 1
1 Offsides 3
68.7 average mark 73.1
outstanding Shooting outstanding
excellent Passing outstanding
outstanding Defending formidable
I had the ball more time, considering checz republic has a very strong midfielders comparing our midfielders. How can you criticize if you don't know how strong are the team? To criticize a tactic is toooo easy congratulations
Then midfielders placed a line don't have do effective play.
I've seen a lot of good passings from our midfielders. You criticize for criticize.
And you need to place one striker in the off-side and one a little retired, and first striker put with a bigest pace.
Definitively no words about that. But 8 shoots without winger against a very strong defenders (and more 1 vs 1 without shoot), it says all.
I'm not going to answer you more, because you seem you are going to be little weight the rest of the season. I don't want to make a discussion every time with you. Any opinions from neutral people would be more fair, but you seems that you do.
(edited)
your midfielders have a very defensive game, and so you lose middle ground
look at the report:
New Zealand Česká republika
debut Tactics lentilky
52% Possession 48%
50% Play in the half 50%
8 Shots 16
6 Fouls 7
1 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 1
1 Offsides 3
68.7 average mark 73.1
outstanding Shooting outstanding
excellent Passing outstanding
outstanding Defending formidable
I had the ball more time, considering checz republic has a very strong midfielders comparing our midfielders. How can you criticize if you don't know how strong are the team? To criticize a tactic is toooo easy congratulations
Then midfielders placed a line don't have do effective play.
I've seen a lot of good passings from our midfielders. You criticize for criticize.
And you need to place one striker in the off-side and one a little retired, and first striker put with a bigest pace.
Definitively no words about that. But 8 shoots without winger against a very strong defenders (and more 1 vs 1 without shoot), it says all.
I'm not going to answer you more, because you seem you are going to be little weight the rest of the season. I don't want to make a discussion every time with you. Any opinions from neutral people would be more fair, but you seems that you do.
(edited)
very nice of you I do not understand why from the beginning was not it? Why should we arguing? why so much arrogance?
ps
You show me table statistics, but in fotball isn't so important the possession or shots. Is important the result. And know that good when you're criticized, here you have lost nothing and nobody told you, by tactical blunders that you do the same (maybe not so serious go, but there are blunders), and upon receiving some harsh criticism ... or not you see where you're wrong, try to argue ... that already starts a discussion between between the 2 or more ... and here you improve in tactics and the coach (responding to criticism in an appropriate manner)
ps
You show me table statistics, but in fotball isn't so important the possession or shots. Is important the result. And know that good when you're criticized, here you have lost nothing and nobody told you, by tactical blunders that you do the same (maybe not so serious go, but there are blunders), and upon receiving some harsh criticism ... or not you see where you're wrong, try to argue ... that already starts a discussion between between the 2 or more ... and here you improve in tactics and the coach (responding to criticism in an appropriate manner)
one more question: I put that question second time:
man I fell you're a noob.
You know what these words mean?
man I fell you're a noob.
You know what these words mean?
Back on topic please people. Take this argument elsewhere thanks. I don't have issues with criticism of tactics but it doesn't need to explode further as it's looking like doing.
hello, as I said out of respect for those who voted for me wanted to try to help his seleção, I would first like to know if my opinion is welcome.
Well, I watched the match and were two goals realemnte suffered from bad luck,well I saw that small corrections could be made in your team.
First, I do not like to use 5 defenders, but since it is your preference, at least it should improve the position, the two DEF sides should be more open, and the MID left and right, should be positioned further back and in line the space between the defenders side because, you said that the MID opponents have better, that way if the MID were dribbling, the ball would be easier for a defender clear the ball, and so on defense strengthened soon MID central could be a little more advanced, which would facilitate the move to the ATT. Incidentally I believe it was a good game, just had bad luck.
sorry bad english :(
Well, I watched the match and were two goals realemnte suffered from bad luck,well I saw that small corrections could be made in your team.
First, I do not like to use 5 defenders, but since it is your preference, at least it should improve the position, the two DEF sides should be more open, and the MID left and right, should be positioned further back and in line the space between the defenders side because, you said that the MID opponents have better, that way if the MID were dribbling, the ball would be easier for a defender clear the ball, and so on defense strengthened soon MID central could be a little more advanced, which would facilitate the move to the ATT. Incidentally I believe it was a good game, just had bad luck.
sorry bad english :(
I'm sure my tactic was perfect for the first game, considering too it was against a higher NT.