Subject: Future Star Pulls

the future is unknowable

we do have these complete pops to work with

--/---/--/

how you add this to 3.5 I don't know - you seem to just be saying it's 3.5 unless I see consecutive pops - thats just some rule you made up - I prefer maths. 10/3 = 3.333333

Well that`s just the way it is:)

Could it not be 4/4/3 though?

mate

will do when i get a chance, only have 3 prospects coming up really and 1 is not that taleneted

Thats fine mate, thanks. :)

could what?

he actually popped /--/---/--/ didn't he? so no, if I understand your question

Yes, 3.5 is the worst his talent could be based on the pops seen.

I have no idea why Vilpu feels 3.5 is the talent that should be recorded, I guess he is a pessimist.

quick rules of thumb are good until you take them to be more accurate than the actual maths

I have had a player before that popped 3,4,4 thats all I meant. For the good of England I'd love him to be 3.5 and less. ;)

My initial thought in honesty was 3.5 as generally I have found my pulls 90% of the time have been 3.5 when they have popped 3,4?

probably true

but 3,4,4 is 11/3=3.66 though and unlikely to get back to 3.5 with a double 3 pop later

He has popped 3,4,3 though so there is more chance of less than 3.5 talent than more than 3.5 talent.

That`s not logical at all.
Any time I can make same screenshot from 3.5 popper.

Having looked at the graph again I agree, 3.5 is the maximum he could be. Any player I have had thats had full pops of 3,4,3 is usually 3.5 in my experience but I hope I am wrong. :)

I cannot remember his youth coach but I have a feeling its Magical and f thats the case then talent is below 3.5 in any case. lol

I assume these players are in the school > 10 weeks and thats the best graph you can possibly create for your 3.5 week popper.

In this case however I think he can have only been in the junior school for 10 weeks due to his age. His talent could be 3.1-3.6 I believe based on the pops shown, you can't say with any certainty at all what his talent is, if you claim you can you are wrong!

Sorry but he cannot be 3.6 even, not with full pops of 3,4,3. It has to be a maximum of 3.5, and besides I think he has a Magical coach so its lower in any case. :)

This is where i don't know if mathematics comes in to play or Sokker's wonderful talent calculations, or even if they are the same thing (sub levels?).

As i understand it - and please correct me wrong for those who have the experience - a player who pops 3-3 and then 4, will have to then pop in 3 weeks twice again before popping in 4, continuing the cycle.

I am starting to think Vilpu may be right, because i thought the length of the first 3 pop determines talent, so in this case (just one 3 pop = 3.5~ talent).

I am also basing this on players in my youth school, 2 of which popped in 3 weeks in their first full pop, but have then gone 4-4; the next 3 pop will close the cycle and that will continue, am i right?