Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [u21] tomkellz
No winger?
What about this guy??
Jay Trude, age: 19
club: Padstow Rovers, country: England
value: 168 450 £, wage: 1 800 £
magical [15] form, good [7] tactical discipline
height: 175 cm
bookings:
average [5] stamina hopeless [1] keeper
outstanding [12] pace weak [4] defender
excellent [10] technique average [5] playmaker
very good [9] passing poor [3] striker
What about this guy??
Jay Trude, age: 19
club: Padstow Rovers, country: England
value: 168 450 £, wage: 1 800 £
magical [15] form, good [7] tactical discipline
height: 175 cm
bookings:
average [5] stamina hopeless [1] keeper
outstanding [12] pace weak [4] defender
excellent [10] technique average [5] playmaker
very good [9] passing poor [3] striker
That guy is not good enough for our u21 team this season though is it. :)
i realise that for most of the season i played 1 of 2 tactics. i was limited most of the time due to my training, whenever i trained striker which is what my players needed last season i had to play 3 upfront. and i have 7 str's, so even when i trained tech or pace i had to play at least 2 up front, and the wing tactic worked well because a few teams in my league played narrow defences which i figured i could get behind a lot :)
if i were u21 manager i wouldn't have any restrictions on tactics, so i would play a bigger variety of tactics as to not become predictable, and more importantly i'd watch the opponents matches to try and find weaknesses in their tactics or players that could be exploited :)
if i were u21 manager i wouldn't have any restrictions on tactics, so i would play a bigger variety of tactics as to not become predictable, and more importantly i'd watch the opponents matches to try and find weaknesses in their tactics or players that could be exploited :)
defence: from what i remember you saying, you said the defence lacked pace. if this is the case then a deeper back line could be used to stop opponents getting in behind us. or a back 5 could be used, as that would limit the opponents chances as well.
winger: normally i would play a winger 1 or 2 spaces deeper than the strikers. we could play a mid who has the passing and pm, but maybe not as good in pace and tech a bit higher, like on line with the strikers as to give him a headstart on the def's, and with good pm and pass could hopefully then have the time to get a decent ball in :) or vice versa with high tech and pace, as to get in behind, but not make as many good chances due to worse balls into the box.
we could also use an extra central midfielder instead of the winger, although i'd prefer to have a winger, if we really don't have anything, then an extra man in the middle could be good especially with the new combination play. with another man in the middle, it would also give more protection to our weak back line :)
(edited)
winger: normally i would play a winger 1 or 2 spaces deeper than the strikers. we could play a mid who has the passing and pm, but maybe not as good in pace and tech a bit higher, like on line with the strikers as to give him a headstart on the def's, and with good pm and pass could hopefully then have the time to get a decent ball in :) or vice versa with high tech and pace, as to get in behind, but not make as many good chances due to worse balls into the box.
we could also use an extra central midfielder instead of the winger, although i'd prefer to have a winger, if we really don't have anything, then an extra man in the middle could be good especially with the new combination play. with another man in the middle, it would also give more protection to our weak back line :)
(edited)
Well done, just a bit unlucky, 2 more votes and the position would have been yours.