Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »English Transfers Only
Sweeney isn't, Radford is I think. I need to update the U-21s before the age update.
Sweeney going for 1.5m is questionable. So is Radford. I guess people have got more money to throw around at the moment,
While I'm on this, how much did the guy go for last night?
McCullum went for 214k and he'll be better than both of them. Even Harris went for 300k
(edited)
While I'm on this, how much did the guy go for last night?
McCullum went for 214k and he'll be better than both of them. Even Harris went for 300k
(edited)
I would have paid 250k for Harris if i had a slot for him
Every day of the week and twice on Sunday
Every day of the week and twice on Sunday
You can say that about any player though. He's Magical Pace before 21, I'm not surprised people are willing to pay for him. I'm far more surprised by Sweeney.
Logged_out to
nothis
I tend to agree with you. Radford is 57 points Vs Sweeney 58. Radford is literally nothing without his pace, whereas Sweeney had a much better balance of skills, where he was stronger in striker (incredible) and pace (Outstanding) for a 20yo. I know who I'd prefer to invest in.
I'd also argue he was more a striker than Radford is, well anything!! Radford's a pretty average defender or striker, who happens to have great pace for his age. If pace is your priority, then Radford's your man, certainly. I prefer my players to have more balance. However, I do appreciate pace training is important for younger players!
We can view things different and train players differently, which in my opinion is a good thing in terms of a little diveristy!
(edited)
I'd also argue he was more a striker than Radford is, well anything!! Radford's a pretty average defender or striker, who happens to have great pace for his age. If pace is your priority, then Radford's your man, certainly. I prefer my players to have more balance. However, I do appreciate pace training is important for younger players!
We can view things different and train players differently, which in my opinion is a good thing in terms of a little diveristy!
(edited)
If they have same talent, Radford is a much better investment and will be a better player due to 3 levels higher pace and same ATT skillsum.
I don't really understand the logic behind "he is nothing without pace". They are the same in overall, while pace is the slowest training, ergo higher pace = better player. At 20yo they're training prospects not players and low tech/low striker will train much faster than Sweeney's pace.
With same talent Radford will have more skills after 2 seasons of trainings than Sweeney.
(edited)
I don't really understand the logic behind "he is nothing without pace". They are the same in overall, while pace is the slowest training, ergo higher pace = better player. At 20yo they're training prospects not players and low tech/low striker will train much faster than Sweeney's pace.
With same talent Radford will have more skills after 2 seasons of trainings than Sweeney.
(edited)