Subject: to or too

ok so what was the point of the wiki post? you did not say he was correct, you said thanks. :) However, I looked it up... the use of 'however' implies that your evidence contradicts the statement. or did you think we would not know where the term came from and were trying to educate us?

Ohh dylanos, dylanos... still sore about being called a woolly in wellies? Serves you right for prancing about the African bush without the proper attire.

Anyhow,... the usage of the word 'However' in this case, meant to signify that this is not the end of the discussion about Wellingtons, despite the fact that woppa was correct in using the plural sense, sans apostrophe. It meant to signify that there is much more to be said about Wellingtons, is that clear now you willie?

And No, under no uncertain terms shall I try to educate illustrious woppa, however you are a totally different case altogether. You wally.

yes well, fascinating though your copying wiki articles about rubber boots might be to you, i was wearing a pair of hunters almost as soon as i could walk. funnily enough, for the first 2 months here rubber boots were the appropriate footware on account of the flooding.

you also need to study the use of punctuation; in particular when to use ; instead of , and also where in the sentence to put the , when using e.g. "however".
(edited)

I thought that the image of an Ironfist and rubber boots might cheer you up in your hospital bed, alas, it seems that ; & , are more attractive to you... :( you might have hit your head harder than you think. ;-)

You can't spell fascinating. Your use of comma is also wrong.

i can spell fascinating, i just didn't proof read my post. my use of commas is correct.

Not having problems with to, too not with two, though apostophes...argh...that's a really hard one for me :(

When should I write:

Peter's [ except of a short form of Peter is :p ]
Peters
Peters'

Anybody able to explain it in a way that I will be capable of understanding it? :p

If it belongs to Peter then it is Peter's. Peter's wang was huge.

If there is more than one Peter then there are two Peters.

If someone's name is Peters and something belongs to him then it is Peters'. Andy Peters is the most famous of English celebrities. He owns a broom cupboard. Therefore it is Peters' broom cupboard.

What's the difference between the first and the last? :p

"If it belongs to Peter then it is Peter's."
"If someone's name is Peters and something belongs to him then it is Peters'."

Sounds like it is the same...

Peter Borkos

Borkos Peters

;)

Ok got it now. Sorry, I'm on my anti-allergic pills. They work almost like soft drugs.

really? wierd... i take all sorts of drugs and they have no affect on my alergies

You should lodge a complaint about it to your drug provider then. :)

i must remember to ask samoan joe about his customer complaints and refunds policy ;D

:D

You could also refer to something belonging to more than one guy called Peter.

Let's say Peter Borkos and Peter Vilpu are best mates and live in a flat together. You could dxescribe it as "The Peters' Flat"