Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Nice or Nasty - Which is best?

  • 1
  • 2
2009-01-01 16:26:45
Kevin Muscat should be in the nasties; he was a rotten sod.

Apparently, only on the pitch, once off it, a thoroughly nice man.
(edited)
2009-01-01 18:13:33
spoken like a true wolves fan.
2009-01-02 08:35:38
I only chose ex Premiership players, so Gary Lineker was unavailable. Did he play in the Prem ever?

John Hartson was a clearly an erroneous omission.

Players like Keane wanted to play for both teams. Cantona is already lined up to play for the Loonies XI, which is my next planned vote. Di Canio is currently filling all 4 midfield spaces.
2009-01-02 08:37:50
Lee Hendrie has been dropped, Hartson onto the Bench in Attack, and Alan Smith moved to Midfield.
2009-01-02 21:46:41
You probably have enough players in those lineups to make an ugly XI too!
2009-01-03 08:10:33
I knew there would be a place for Beardsley and Keown somewhere!
2009-01-03 21:41:56
Iain Dowie is also pleased to make that team!
2009-01-04 11:52:30
There's almost enough distinctive players to create a miniature friendly league... there are The Nice, The Nasty, The Loonies and maybe even Show-Offs or Wannabes. Someone should volunteer to cover the matches.
2009-01-07 11:30:35
You miss Gomes for the nice guys team.
2013-04-18 00:07:05
It's kind funny to see Ronaldo in a team labelled as 'nasty', eh?
  • 1
  • 2