Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Battrick
Haha could be worse --- Englishmen and winning eh? :)
End of Over 52 (1 runs). Must Destroy CC: 149-1, runrate=2.87 (1st Inn: 92-10)
Trail by 84 runs. (Pboranjing CC 325-10)
Wigg 15-5-36-0
Roper* 64 (140 balls)
Mckenzie 28 (76 balls)
Buggers, fighting back. Still in the box seat, though, I guess, being in the lead and them being one down.
Trail by 84 runs. (Pboranjing CC 325-10)
Wigg 15-5-36-0
Roper* 64 (140 balls)
Mckenzie 28 (76 balls)
Buggers, fighting back. Still in the box seat, though, I guess, being in the lead and them being one down.
End of Over 52 (1 runs). Toms Stumps: 86-6, runrate=1.65 (1st Inn: 32-10)
Trail by 247 runs. (Garboldisham Casuals 365-10)
This should be over today.
Trail by 247 runs. (Garboldisham Casuals 365-10)
This should be over today.
It's the first game my opener has done a proper jobs since I sold his partner. Putting a rubbish number 2 really seems to mess up concentration of most of my batsmen. An interesting case study, even if it has ruined my chances of winning FC this season.
Interestingly, I play a shitty number one and put my best guy at two. He averages over a hundred in OD and FC.
Maybe your shitty number one isn't that shitty. He can't be as shitty as my number two.
Is that a poo gag?
Stamina: abysmal Wicket Keeping: woeful
Batting: competent Concentration: woeful
Bowling: woeful Consistency: abysmal
Fielding: woeful
Stamina: abysmal Wicket Keeping: woeful
Batting: competent Concentration: woeful
Bowling: woeful Consistency: abysmal
Fielding: woeful
wow, he's an ablution.
here's my number 2 :
Stamina: mediocre Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: mediocre Concentration: mediocre
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: feeble
Fielding: woeful
who smells worst ?
(edited)
here's my number 2 :
Stamina: mediocre Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: mediocre Concentration: mediocre
Bowling: mediocre Consistency: feeble
Fielding: woeful
who smells worst ?
(edited)
Ah, my decent player averages over a hundred...not my crappy one.
Better lay off the bran then.
My decent player used to average over a hundred, he's been cack since I sold the quality batting number 2 though, until yesterday that is, when the opponent was sufficiently useless to permit him to score runs.
(edited)
My decent player used to average over a hundred, he's been cack since I sold the quality batting number 2 though, until yesterday that is, when the opponent was sufficiently useless to permit him to score runs.
(edited)
End of Over 17 (11 runs). Wolves: 85-0, runrate=5.00 (1st Inn: 321-10)
Trail by 94 runs. (ReSpite CCC 500-5 dec)
Maloney 9-0-60-0
Binns* 41 (41 balls)
Wilson 40 (61 balls)
Not going too badly, may scrape a draw, be very lucky if I won.
Trail by 94 runs. (ReSpite CCC 500-5 dec)
Maloney 9-0-60-0
Binns* 41 (41 balls)
Wilson 40 (61 balls)
Not going too badly, may scrape a draw, be very lucky if I won.
I won by an innings and a hundred and summing.