Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: YYYYYYEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS!

2007-12-04 14:23:31
i agree more conditional orders
2007-12-04 17:07:46
I don't even need more conditional orders.

Just make the existing ones work properly. That seems like a big stretch though :/
(edited)
2007-12-04 17:08:56
When I've used them, they've worked.
2007-12-04 18:44:20
I too would like more conditional orders. It would come in handy for cup matches where you are trying to get the most training possible but would like to be able to sub in lots of A teamers if necessary. Currently I can only conditionally sub in 3/4 A teamers at 2 different times in the match. Would be nice to be able to do so 4+ times :)


Would adding more conditional orders cause a greater load to the servers? I'm thinking it would at least cause a minor increase to the load.
(edited)
2007-12-04 22:34:01
This isn't youth soccer with unlimited subs.

Correct me if I am wrong, but you can only have 3 subs in a match, right? Any conditional orders met after the third sub would be ignored.
2007-12-04 22:42:17
you are correct.
2007-12-04 22:44:54
You clearly don't use enough of them, then.

Again, the problem is not that I want more conditionals. I want the existing conditionals to work properly. If they did, I wouldnt need any more then exist now.

For example, contingency substituting has been broken forever.
(edited)
2007-12-04 22:48:49
contingency SUBS???? what this mean??
2007-12-04 22:55:05
what the conditionals need is a first stoppage option or any time after option.

If we had the option to pick either or with each conditional it would be an improvement.
2007-12-04 22:58:45
If red card to to CD, move DM to CD or even better:

If red card to CD make subs and switch to a pre-designed 10 men tactic.

That would be the bomb!
(edited)
2007-12-04 23:01:57
You mean something like "from.....to......." so if it happen in that time frame......


If it wasn't for YOU i will still don't know how the red card option works....

But for the rest My players swap or Subs always worked..^_^
2007-12-04 23:08:45
How about something as simple as pull my best striker with a 3 goal lead.

and not have 4 conditionals 10 minutes apart.
2007-12-05 00:25:04
@Kermmy803

Maybe I didn't express my thoughts clearly. This is an example of what I tried to say. Lets say you just get 3 total subs in a match. Well I'm playing a cup match with mainly B teamers. I would like to be able to sub those 3 A teamers in together if I am drawing or losing based on the score at minutes 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75. That would require a total of 15 conditional orders.
2007-12-05 01:05:38
"Currently I can only conditionally sub in 3/4 A teamers at 2 different times in the match. Would be nice to be able to do so 4+ times :)"

read it, he means that he wants to be able to conditionally send the SAME three people into the game at 4 different times if at 4 different points in the game he starts doing poorly.

he obviously didnt mean subbing in 12 players..
(edited)
2007-12-05 01:08:35
that would be the bomb tehehelol
2007-12-05 01:39:36
I understand the 2 different times, but the 3/4 infers more than the allowable 3, IMO.

And my snarky youth comment may have been a bit overoboard as I took a swipe at our RL youth (and college) system as well. :P