Subject: A League.03 vs A League.04 competition ...

I refuse to be drawn into a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent ... ;)

unarmed?

I'll go with bored and looking for a fight.

don't be so sure. If I can manage a tie with Dio's team with a total half-ass tactic, hell finish in second with it, what makes you think I couldn't drop the hammer when I needed to.

Your days of being "much" better then my franchise died when you let your team get too old in the ML.

You can thank Jon for that too for the good financial advice he's given me :)
(edited)

it didn't stop A4 from whooping A3's collective ass now did it :)

Feh. The tactic I'm using I haven't even looked at in a match. The 3 midfielders I have in the center all have poor playmaking and less. And that team only beat me 3-0? Pffttt. It was hysterical man.

:)

i've never been too old, grasshopper.

And anyway, if you guys think i'm actively managing this team, you're a bit off. The admin crap takes up too much of my time and honestly i don't have the motivation to manage effectively.

no, I know you haven't :)

The only match all second half I actively managed was the Pronghorn game in the last week that allowed me to guarantee a top 4 finish. Because 2nd place (me) was 25 points, and 5th (him) was 22.

We could prob start a new thread discussing the tactic apathy that develops when you get to A league, actually.

I remember back when I was all about tactics and getting pissed off when tactics work but the ME lol'd at them twice a year. Then by my second year of A, after knowing there was next to no chance I'd ever lose a qualifier, I slipped into 'whatever' mode like many others at and above my level.

I think that describes the competition fairly well. "whatever"