Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [U21] vs Argentina

  • 1
  • 2
2010-07-31 01:07:18
I only counted 1 "real" 1 on 1 from USA (in first half) and counted 4-5 from Argentina (2nd half" I say they deserved to win because in the 2nd half they were better than us and could have scored more. They were better than us because of the injury and the red card. Our goal came from a long shot also so nothing to brag about there.
2010-07-31 01:15:23
There goals came from our defenders fumbling a pass and another defender fouling him in the box trying to cover up his gaf

and the 2nd was the keeper's gaf,


Nothing to brag about there

and quit with the one on one's, judge them the same on both ends.


edit: I guess I don't feel they deserved either of their goals so I can't think of any reason why they deserved to win.
(edited)
2010-07-31 01:21:54
A goal is a goal. Doesn't matter if its pretty or if its ugly.
2010-07-31 02:04:55
when did i say that it matters whether the goal went in ugly or pretty?
2010-07-31 02:05:49
I'm judging them the same according to my standards which might be different than yours.
2010-07-31 02:29:46
are you saying the bad angle one on one wasn't real?

I still only see 3 one on one's for them. Care to give me the minutes?
2010-07-31 03:04:02
i'll do it later im watching a soccer game i'll do it in a couple of hours
2010-07-31 13:09:42
Our goal came from a long shot also so nothing to brag about there.

It doesn't matter HOW they are scored. It can be from 50 meters out, or it can be from 5 meters out. It's still a goal. So I don't see where you think that scoring from distance makes it any "less" of a goal..
2010-07-31 13:10:25
i think he means that it's not down to tactical acumen
2010-07-31 21:59:28
exactly.
  • 1
  • 2