Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] vs Scotland
I did make a conditional order, don't know why it didn't kick in, although it would of brought the wide defender from the other side over is all.
I was guessing a 1 winger tactic.
I was guessing a 1 winger tactic.
Surely you would have used a conditional order to move Cox into defence?
On that topic, is there any reason why he was playing in midfield rather than in defence, was there really big form issue for the other central midfield options?
In terms of the tactic, I'm not a massive fan of strikers & wingers that high up the pitch. It felt like you were asking for offsides by lining with strikers that high. Using two strikers and a winger was never my style, for me it always felt that an extra central midfielder is of more use, this is personal bias though, no real evidence to say which works best.
On that topic, is there any reason why he was playing in midfield rather than in defence, was there really big form issue for the other central midfield options?
In terms of the tactic, I'm not a massive fan of strikers & wingers that high up the pitch. It felt like you were asking for offsides by lining with strikers that high. Using two strikers and a winger was never my style, for me it always felt that an extra central midfielder is of more use, this is personal bias though, no real evidence to say which works best.
I better triple check the red card conditionals next week.
as for the tactic, wish we had 90 mins to find out.
as for the tactic, wish we had 90 mins to find out.
LOL, conditional are not working...
I had set:
1' if red card or there is no player at position 3 - Tarley
1' if red card or there is no player at position 4 - Tarley
1' if red card or there is no player at position 7 - Tarley
Eurush got red and Tarley doesn't fill out the gap :\
(edited)
I had set:
1' if red card or there is no player at position 3 - Tarley
1' if red card or there is no player at position 4 - Tarley
1' if red card or there is no player at position 7 - Tarley
Eurush got red and Tarley doesn't fill out the gap :\
(edited)
im sorry but i do not understand your issue.
You have a red card on a player and you expect a player from the bench to come on for that red card???
looking at your match report i cant figure out what happened at position 8.
You have a red card on a player and you expect a player from the bench to come on for that red card???
looking at your match report i cant figure out what happened at position 8.
yeah, a guy cant come on for a red card, only an injury
dude if someone gets a red nobody can replace him... lol
To straight this up in one response.
Tarley has set conditionals orders at 1' to replace any defender when the red card will occur or there is no player (injury). Also he was set to change at 46' player at position 8 (MID), but shit happens (injury) and then dude from position 8 was replaced by another MID from the bench, before 46' conditional order. Red card occurred at 76' when Tarley was on the field and should to move to DEF position, but stays at position 8 :\
My goal for that conditional was:
- 1-45': if there is a major injury (no player) for any DEF Tarley will switch him
- 1-45': if there is a red card for any DEF wait till the half time
- 46': Tarley set to replace a player at position 8 and if a red card occurred during the firs half should to go to fill this gap (true or not?)
- 46-90': Tarley should to fill out any gap at DEF after any red card (true or not?)
(edited)
Tarley has set conditionals orders at 1' to replace any defender when the red card will occur or there is no player (injury). Also he was set to change at 46' player at position 8 (MID), but shit happens (injury) and then dude from position 8 was replaced by another MID from the bench, before 46' conditional order. Red card occurred at 76' when Tarley was on the field and should to move to DEF position, but stays at position 8 :\
My goal for that conditional was:
- 1-45': if there is a major injury (no player) for any DEF Tarley will switch him
- 1-45': if there is a red card for any DEF wait till the half time
- 46': Tarley set to replace a player at position 8 and if a red card occurred during the firs half should to go to fill this gap (true or not?)
- 46-90': Tarley should to fill out any gap at DEF after any red card (true or not?)
(edited)