Subject: [NT] fromastaflex; re-election

Soda. Heh.

It's fizzy drinks not soda :P. Only one type of soda here, and that is cream soda.

*decides to stop spamming this topic and let the election stuff continue*

See guys, I protect us from the brits!!!

--- begin email ---

message to: mr_gibbage
sent on: 2006-11-14 21:29:52
Subject: Ban, 2 Days

Mr_gibbage,

Sir this is to inform you that you have received a ban for spamming a USA forum election thread after being asked politely and appropriately to stop, as your input was neither on topic nor valued as a non-american.

I kindly request you to be more selective in your decisions on where and how to post your thoughts, and to keep random conjectures and statements to appropriate "freestyle" threads.

Future transgressions of this nature will result in progressively harsher punishments and potential financial penalties by an administrator based on their severity.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Guacamole, USACanada Moderator for Sokker.

thats hilarious if you actually did that

but on a serious note:

Yes, there is the 'horse midstream' argument. But I'd also want people to vote for me because they believe I am the most fit for the job.

I say we pass a binding resolution to let the NT coach run the team all the way through the WC before he gets Arena-ized.In return he can't run for NT coach again till another 2 season cycle passes.........(hah! coach term limits,I've become what I hate)

I don't think we need a binding resolution. Honestly, if the coach is doing well i don't see him losing. There's only 2-3 players who could challenge fro anyway. Because fro's doing well. but if he had lost a few quali matches and didn't make the final, i don't think we should have a resolution to let him try the friendlies in the 2nd season...

And to fro: I did indeed ban Mr_gibbage and send that note, but he can just un-ban himself. :)

I've even banned greg once, lol.

So my question for you, Mr. fromastaflex. Who's better? The Lorax (who speaks for the trees), or Dumbo (who can fly, damnit!)?

So you're asking him if he prefers the super-preachy or the super-depressing?

Tough call.

Mparks, DO NOT DISPARAGE THE LORAX, he speaks for the brown barbaloots who have fun in the sun in their barbaloot suits, as they play in the shade and eat truffular fruits!

Well on this one id have to show my love to teddy geisel

I loved the Lorax when I was a kid. When I hit high school and saw it again I still enjoyed it, but MAN was it preachy. Geisel has the same view towards industrialization that Tolkien has. And I don't mean that in a good way.

Yeah he's preacy indeed, i just love Dr. Seuss's way with words and rhyme, so i love the book itself.

But he is the reason that ive been asked if i like ham all my life though, that got pretty old fast

Sam are you?

yep.

ucsd's library is named after him (geisel). its a pretty awesome building but i hardly ever go into it haha
(edited)

Fox in Socks rules.


That is all.

Why do I feel like I just stumbled into some weird Romper Room?