Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] Discussion
won't it only check at the 1 minute mark though?
If something happens at the 30 minute mark, no conditional will fire off - because again, most conditional commands are stupidly coded to only fire off at the specified point in time - and not any time after that in which the condition might be subsequently met.
If something happens at the 30 minute mark, no conditional will fire off - because again, most conditional commands are stupidly coded to only fire off at the specified point in time - and not any time after that in which the condition might be subsequently met.
From the news posted 12/24/07
for the conditional orders listed below, the minute will mean minute to start checking condition, not minute when condition is checked (if you set a condition in the first minute, it could happen in the 89th minute for instance as the event will be checked all game, rather than just in the 1st minute as it would have been before):
* player has yellow card
* red card or no player
* player is slightly injured
for the conditional orders listed below, the minute will mean minute to start checking condition, not minute when condition is checked (if you set a condition in the first minute, it could happen in the 89th minute for instance as the event will be checked all game, rather than just in the 1st minute as it would have been before):
* player has yellow card
* red card or no player
* player is slightly injured
dagwood: kudos to you man. If I had remembered this I'd have won this past week.
Then again, if all the conditionals worked all along as intended, it wouldnt have been an issue. I guess I assume nothing works, because very little actually does.
Then again, if all the conditionals worked all along as intended, it wouldnt have been an issue. I guess I assume nothing works, because very little actually does.
they shouldn't post things in the future like that. ;)
(edited)
(edited)
benmor: I'll be running in the future, you'll get your chance.
Let me know when, I'll be sure to finish 2nd in that election too. It's not like the USA to elect a new coach without me being second in the voting, I think its happened everytime we've had a change of powers :P
Let me know when, I'll be sure to finish 2nd in that election too. It's not like the USA to elect a new coach without me being second in the voting, I think its happened everytime we've had a change of powers :P
one question......why did you use Merle Bobo as a starter?
We out of the world cup :(
Bobo started for a raison, skmail me to know why.
I will not run next season someone else deserves a shot.
Bobo started for a raison, skmail me to know why.
I will not run next season someone else deserves a shot.
You are way to easy to play against. This was a win for us even before the match started as you don't change your tactic. Hate to say it, but this elemination is entirely due to your predictfullness..
Actually Hellsangel, you were easy to play against.
I gave Lakay a virtual dead ringer scouting report on you and your team - and it took me all of an hour to do.
I sent Lakay 4 long emails about your two primary tactics - and the one I predicted you'd use is the one you used. I knew you'd be confident about winning.
tactically, we played the best game of ANY of the three against you this round. The other two opponents against you, hellsnagel, played moronic tactics offensively. Especially your second opponent - who clearly wasn't bright enough to pick up on the mistakes made by the first opponent.
It looks like Lakay implemented a good portion of my suggestions, and on a luckier day, we'd have had a better result.
No, Hellsangel. You won for one and one reason only - better players. Better players on defense, better players on offense.
Two of your three goals were INDEFENSIBLE. Meaning there was nothing anyone could do to stop them. That's talent differential.
Your defense was by far the fastest in the grouping, and your only hole is up the middle. which if we had more teams and corresponding talent as you. It's also why we managed to score a goal - and no one else did.
Really, the most damning matchup was our defense versus your offense. You've got a world class striker in Van Der Haar (something else I noticed right away - and you conveniently left out of your world cup report on your own team). and Van der eede isn't much worse.
Our defensive backline is adequate, but not polished. They gave your team far too many opportunities on corners and throw-ins in deep. It was only a matter of time before your strikers took advantage.
No, hellsangel - the only one who was easy was you and you'll find that out in the next round when you actually face opponents at your skill level.
Now go away, self absorbed in your own arrogance that's backed by players you didn't train yet are oh so fortunate to have that they can cover your OWN simplistic tactics.
(edited)
I gave Lakay a virtual dead ringer scouting report on you and your team - and it took me all of an hour to do.
I sent Lakay 4 long emails about your two primary tactics - and the one I predicted you'd use is the one you used. I knew you'd be confident about winning.
tactically, we played the best game of ANY of the three against you this round. The other two opponents against you, hellsnagel, played moronic tactics offensively. Especially your second opponent - who clearly wasn't bright enough to pick up on the mistakes made by the first opponent.
It looks like Lakay implemented a good portion of my suggestions, and on a luckier day, we'd have had a better result.
No, Hellsangel. You won for one and one reason only - better players. Better players on defense, better players on offense.
Two of your three goals were INDEFENSIBLE. Meaning there was nothing anyone could do to stop them. That's talent differential.
Your defense was by far the fastest in the grouping, and your only hole is up the middle. which if we had more teams and corresponding talent as you. It's also why we managed to score a goal - and no one else did.
Really, the most damning matchup was our defense versus your offense. You've got a world class striker in Van Der Haar (something else I noticed right away - and you conveniently left out of your world cup report on your own team). and Van der eede isn't much worse.
Our defensive backline is adequate, but not polished. They gave your team far too many opportunities on corners and throw-ins in deep. It was only a matter of time before your strikers took advantage.
No, hellsangel - the only one who was easy was you and you'll find that out in the next round when you actually face opponents at your skill level.
Now go away, self absorbed in your own arrogance that's backed by players you didn't train yet are oh so fortunate to have that they can cover your OWN simplistic tactics.
(edited)