Subject: YOUTH February 14

Nathan was formidable +2 (a little better then my formidable last week) and has poor talent (6). Colin was an adequate +2 and wasn't around long enough to judge his talent.

Nathan Arguedas, age: 19
value: 166 400 C$, wage: 2 160 C$
club: Valiant FC, country: Canada
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

average stamina, good keeper
average pace, poor defender
hopeless technique, poor playmaker
solid passing, hopeless striker

Colin Bellavance, age: 17
value: 29 600 C$, wage: 840 C$
club: Valiant FC, country: Canada
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

poor stamina, tragic keeper
hopeless pace, unsatisfactory defender
average technique, poor playmaker
hopeless passing, weak striker

The hares had two this week, both will be listed later today. Both had five week talent.

Frank Macharski age: 21
value: 144 800 C$, wage: 2 040 C$
club: Snowhares, country: Canada
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

hopeless stamina, tragic keeper
unsatisfactory pace, adequate defender
unsatisfactory technique, weak playmaker
very good passing, very good striker

and

Harman Ricciardi age: 18
value: 266 800 C$, wage: 3 320 C$
club: Snowhares, country: Canada
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

weak stamina, very good keeper
weak pace, hopeless defender
tragic technique, hopeless playmaker
adequate passing, tragic striker

The Hawkes fired two pulls this week - an excellent and a solid, a 8 and 4 week talent. The excellent was an average keeper with hopeless pace 20yo. The solid was solid in stamina and othewise hopeless, 18yo!

Solid in stamina? I thought the max possible on a youth was adequate?

I pulled a few hours ago and fired him right away - so I am probably exagerating, sorry.

Gotcha. Wasn't trying to nit-pick - just curious if we had an abnormality. :)

I send mine to finish school.

highest possible is good stamina afaik...
(edited)

Interesting. I've never seen a good (and we've seen lots of high stamina around here :D).

check out this magical junior in the bottom of this page

junior

I'm surprised by that. "Adequate" occupies the same relative position on the stamina scale as "Excellent" does for everything else.

That's the first "good" I've seen. Any chance the user pulled him early enough he actually got hit by the training update? :D

i've actually seen quite a lot of players with "good" stamina after being pulled ;)
(edited)

another one here

#2 :)

Very interesting. Changes my outlook a little. :)

I screwed the math up. The max non-stamina skill isn't excellent (10), it's excellent (10.99). So the corresponding skill on the stamina scale would be good (~7.1).

So one would pretty much need to max out that skill to get good stamina - should be relatively rare. :)