Subject: Trainers

Thats how I work personally as well. I have 2 magical (1 youth and 1 main) and 2 brilliant coaches as assistants. However I used to have 3 brilliant assistants. Decided to try to remove one to see if I see any difference in pops and to reduce some wages for a couple of weeks. However to my surprise I did not see any changes in training (i.e losing random pops because of 2 assts instead of 3)

I think the asst coach thing is quite arguable. We dont have a real proof whether 3 are better than 2 or two are better than 1 or the other way round.


I read a post by Solli in this forum stating that he is trying with 3 incredible coaches assistants instead of 2 Brilliant/Magical. Checco seems to be doing the same as stated in his previous post, so maybe they are seeing better results with that system rather than having two strong coaches as their assistants. They are the best people to tell us if by changing to this system whether they saw more benefits in training cause they tried it. It is an interesting point however and their theory makes sense too.

The problem is that when you have nothing in rules specifically, you need to work with assumptions and trial and error. If Checco and Soli are having still the same results or maybe better, I would probably try their system too cause I think it will actually reduce wages as well.

On my side it's 2 magical (1 youth 1 main) and 3 brilliant.
Happy with what i've got last seasons, but my players are very young and I select carefully the promoted one, like Barera !.

having young players helps a lot to get the maximum from your coaches......the most important thing is that you build a training plan and when you buy young players you buy players who fit in your training plan.

i.e it doesn't make sense buying a player with hopeless pace if you are not planning to train pace for the next 2/3 seasons.

Ideally you will have most of the players able to fit your training regime.