Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Australian Club Stats
Thanks for the update.
I've been waiting for Dream Team Web to update rather than trawling through all the matches by hand.
I've been waiting for Dream Team Web to update rather than trawling through all the matches by hand.
20th cap for Tony Nikas was more memorable than Veart's 70th.
it's everyone's dream to run out get a game and create a moment everyone at the game will remember and still get paid for it and walk away injury free. :p Veart just wanted to get away early to join Sheff Wed ;).
Still made me annoyed though :(.
Still made me annoyed though :(.
haha that was great...yay im on the field...time for a beer, come here mr colombian
Tribe up their best mark by 0.2 (pretty happy with that given that 2 starters were out)
I beg to differ, from my calculations you got 46.4
(edited)
(edited)
Tribe become the third team to break the 50.0 average mark barrier with a 50.3 good for 2nd best all-time. Mixed feelings for us though as we're converting under 10% of our shots at the moment.
Tollygunge up their best rating to 46.7 enough to jump them up to 7th.
Had a look through the top keepers. Borkowski and Vater's best games are now both updated.
Tollygunge up their best rating to 46.7 enough to jump them up to 7th.
Had a look through the top keepers. Borkowski and Vater's best games are now both updated.
This seems to be a recurring theme where your calculations dont add up right =p
i swear i checked it twice, it should be 46.4 I must be doing something wrong
Noope they are adding it up wrong, all they are doing is adding up all the totals and dividing by twelve when in fact burkski and paplias scores are (58/90 x 55) + (32/90 x 47) = score for that position
(edited)
(edited)
Noope they are adding it up wrong, all they are doing is adding up all the totals and dividing by twelve when in fact burkski and paplias scores are (58/90 x 55) + (32/90 x 47) = score for that position
(edited)
(edited)
I miss out on making highest rating by .1 haha damn
But if that's the way he's been doing it all this while, it's bettler to let it stay, no? :p
the new plus stats says 46.7 so I guess that is what you have :P kinda means the way I have always calculated it to be wrong
And the way he has been doing it is by the plus marks, nice work
And the way he has been doing it is by the plus marks, nice work
You may well be right Achmid (in fact it sounds like you are), but there's no way I'm going to manually calculate ratings for the purposes of this thread.