Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: [POLITICA]
erano altri tempi, ok, ma il tema della "armi di distrazione di massa" è sempre valido
Il regime fascista non è stato altro che un gruppo di criminali al potere.
Pierpaolo Pasolini
Pierpaolo Pasolini
devi lasciare solo l'id del video dopo il punto di domanda.
Quindi togli la parte in nero
https://www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue=1 & v=Dzw59dK0PA8
Quindi togli la parte in nero
https://www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue=1 & v=Dzw59dK0PA8
sa e ha sempre saputo, la merdina!
Romano Prodi "Andiamo sempre di più verso una capacità produttiva enormemente superiore al potere d'acquisto e questo uccide il lavoro"
Romano Prodi "Andiamo sempre di più verso una capacità produttiva enormemente superiore al potere d'acquisto e questo uccide il lavoro"
ho notato che il mortadella sta tornando alla carica.....tradotto "il pd è in un mare di merda per il 2018 quindi resuscitiamo chiunque"
ho riletto la parola "patrimoniale" ahahahahahahahahah
questi vogliono la rivoluzione mi sa. tanto chi c'ha i soldi intesta tutto a immobiliari e ufficialmente non c'ha nu cazz
questi vogliono la rivoluzione mi sa. tanto chi c'ha i soldi intesta tutto a immobiliari e ufficialmente non c'ha nu cazz
la boschi vuole aggredire il contante presente nelle case
adesso verrà fuori che anche le zoccole dovranno lavorare con il bancomat o carta di credito.....
che brutto paese che sta diventando l'italia...
adesso verrà fuori che anche le zoccole dovranno lavorare con il bancomat o carta di credito.....
che brutto paese che sta diventando l'italia...
The speech made by the US President in his maiden address on the UN arena in the prevailing serious circumstances, in which the situation on the Korean peninsula has been rendered tense as never before and is inching closer to a touch-and-go state, is arousing worldwide concern.
Shaping the general idea of what he would say, I expected he would make stereotyped, prepared remarks a little from what he used to utter in his office on the spur of the moment as he had to speak on the world's biggest official diplomatic stage.
But, far from making any remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful in diffusion tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense no one has ever heard from any of his predecessors.
A frightened dog barks louder.
I'd like to advise Trump to exercise prudence in selecting words and be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in front of the world.
The mentally deranged behaviour of the US President openly expressing on the UN arena the unethical will to "totally destroy" a sovereign state, beyond the boundary of threats and regime change or overturn of social system, makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure.
His remarks remind me of such words as "political layman" and "political heretic" which were in vogue in reference to Trump during his presidential election campaign.
After taking office Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world. He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.
His remarks which described the US option through straightforward expression of his will have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.
Now that Trump has denied the existence of and insulted me and my country in front of the eyes of the world and made the most ferocious declaration of war in history that he would destroy the DPRK, we will consider with seriousness exercising a corresponding, highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history.
Action is the best option in treating the dotard who, hard of hearing, is uttering only what he wants to say.
As a man representing the DPRK and on behalf of the dignity and honor of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the DPRK.
This is not a rhetorical expression loved by Trump.
I am now thinking hard about what response he could have expected when he allowed such eccentric words to trip off his tongue.
Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation.
I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire.
Kim jong-un
Sinceramente faccio fatica a pensare che lui e Trump rappresentino due popoli e abbiano tutto questo potere, quando esprimono concetti di livello così infimo.
Shaping the general idea of what he would say, I expected he would make stereotyped, prepared remarks a little from what he used to utter in his office on the spur of the moment as he had to speak on the world's biggest official diplomatic stage.
But, far from making any remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful in diffusion tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense no one has ever heard from any of his predecessors.
A frightened dog barks louder.
I'd like to advise Trump to exercise prudence in selecting words and be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in front of the world.
The mentally deranged behaviour of the US President openly expressing on the UN arena the unethical will to "totally destroy" a sovereign state, beyond the boundary of threats and regime change or overturn of social system, makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure.
His remarks remind me of such words as "political layman" and "political heretic" which were in vogue in reference to Trump during his presidential election campaign.
After taking office Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world. He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.
His remarks which described the US option through straightforward expression of his will have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.
Now that Trump has denied the existence of and insulted me and my country in front of the eyes of the world and made the most ferocious declaration of war in history that he would destroy the DPRK, we will consider with seriousness exercising a corresponding, highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history.
Action is the best option in treating the dotard who, hard of hearing, is uttering only what he wants to say.
As a man representing the DPRK and on behalf of the dignity and honor of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the DPRK.
This is not a rhetorical expression loved by Trump.
I am now thinking hard about what response he could have expected when he allowed such eccentric words to trip off his tongue.
Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation.
I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire.
Kim jong-un
Sinceramente faccio fatica a pensare che lui e Trump rappresentino due popoli e abbiano tutto questo potere, quando esprimono concetti di livello così infimo.
mah più che altro il nano coreano sa bene che nessuno si prenderà briga di ammazzare 30 milioni di persone, per cui alza la voce.
ovvio che se dall'altra parte c'è uno che probabilmente voleva scendere in piazza e sparare con il suo fucile all'uragano irma per farlo scomparire il dialogo risulta quantomeno difficile.
ovvio che se dall'altra parte c'è uno che probabilmente voleva scendere in piazza e sparare con il suo fucile all'uragano irma per farlo scomparire il dialogo risulta quantomeno difficile.