Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[I] Nieuws Algemeen
Volgens mij is het alleen interessant als je elke week een uitverkocht huis hebt.
Als het niet uitverkocht is en je verlaagt de prijzen, komen er waarschijnlijk meer mensen. Maar of de winst ook hoger is, wordt lastig te controleren.
Als het niet uitverkocht is en je verlaagt de prijzen, komen er waarschijnlijk meer mensen. Maar of de winst ook hoger is, wordt lastig te controleren.
ook eens kijken of ik 51.000 man bij een friendly kan krijgen :)
Gelukkig maar dat er een maximum is, anders heb je je stadion voor niks uitgebreid... :p
daar heeft La Sombra eigenlijk wel een punt.
weet nu nog eigenlijk niet of ik het wel ga verhogen. ik kijk nog wel even:P
weet nu nog eigenlijk niet of ik het wel ga verhogen. ik kijk nog wel even:P
Het lastige met dit uitvogelen is dat wat in de ene week het optimum is in een andere week gewoon een slechte keuze is. Het heeft denk ik gewoon te maken met supportermood en supportermood van je tegenstander. En ik zou me zo kunnen voorstellen dat de supportersverwachting ook invloed heeft... En dan natuurlijk nog het aantal supporters en de mood van je tegenstander.
Maar, I like it :)
Maar, I like it :)
Dat kon zeker en vast, maar ik denk dat de huidige locatie de meest logische is. ;)
Ik zou de prijs van de seizoenskaarten graag fors verlagen.... (dat wil zeggen in de periode week 1-15 (a)) Om zo meer sups te lokken ;)
Hehe ;)
In mijn huidige stadion situatie zou ik dan de prijzen voor tribuneplaatsen fors willen verhogen en de prijzen voor de vips/zit status quo willen houden plus minus. Nu is de vraag, gaan de supporters van de tribune dan wegblijven, of gaan die zich begeven naar de vips/zit zo dat die altijd vol zitten?
In mijn huidige stadion situatie zou ik dan de prijzen voor tribuneplaatsen fors willen verhogen en de prijzen voor de vips/zit status quo willen houden plus minus. Nu is de vraag, gaan de supporters van de tribune dan wegblijven, of gaan die zich begeven naar de vips/zit zo dat die altijd vol zitten?
Ik wil juist de prijzen voor 1 normale zitplaats in de hoek verlagen om zo supporters in grote getale te lokken die dan vervolgens zich netjes houden aan
"Supporters select the cheapest stand from the ones that suit them. However, a spectator is likely to buy a ticket for a stand with a higher cost, if their preferred seat is sold out."
en dus allemaal dure tickest kopen ;)
"Supporters select the cheapest stand from the ones that suit them. However, a spectator is likely to buy a ticket for a stand with a higher cost, if their preferred seat is sold out."
en dus allemaal dure tickest kopen ;)
korte zijde
Benches in de hoek 5,- achter de goal 7,25
lange zijde
Seats 8,50
Seats under roof 10,-
zo ga ik het voorlopig aanpakken.
Benches in de hoek 5,- achter de goal 7,25
lange zijde
Seats 8,50
Seats under roof 10,-
zo ga ik het voorlopig aanpakken.
Starting with Wednesdays friendlies we are testing a new version of the match engine. In the new engine we have added a little more combination play with short passes to make matches more nice to watch and to further decrease the strength of defensive tactics (tactics like 532). We are also allowing managers to set their own ticket prices.
Combination play
It might look like this is a little change.... but that's not true. In fact the modification is much bigger than the ticket prices added. As with that change there is a related testing process that took a number of weeks. How do we test? We generate hundred of matches and run them repeatedly. It takes up to half and hour. Than we analyse the statistics we get from the matches like average score, shots on the goal, number of passes, long and short, average pass distance, and dozens of similar stats. We check in the statistics to see if the engine performed close to what we wanted to achieve (usually its not:), view some matches and than make some parameter tuning and engine corrections and then repeat testing.... over and over for weeks. Despite this laborious testing, we are still not sure how the engine will perform in every single match. We have already tested combination play a few seasons ago, but that time it failed and we removed it from the match engine. Hopefully this time it will be a success as it is now a much better balance. Please report bugs on Bugs / Ideas (en) forum with match ID and minute, report bug only if weird situation is repeated at least twice in single match and if it is passing bug - especially if player passed instead of shooting or passed to the wrong player. We are mainly interested in NT matches bugs or with top club teams playing their first team squads. Reported bugs in other situation will make it hard to determine if the player was just low skilled, or the engine generated the mistaken action :]
Ticket prices
We are now allowing you to set your match ticket prices for each stand. Prices are able to be set on your stadium page. How expensive or cheap compared to the default price in the rules you set is up to you. We recommend you set prices depending on the size of the supporters clubs of both teams. The better the teams playing the higher you can expect to put the ticket price and still expect the same number of supporters attending your match. So you would get a higher income. Good club teams may expect even one and a half times bigger (150%) higher incomes on matches than before. Notice that if you set the prices much too high less supporters will come, and you can expect lower income. Same if the price is much too low, more supporters will come, but not so much to compensate for such a low price. You will get the highest income if you set the right price for class of teams playing in the match. Of course, if your stadium is little and you expect many supporters to attend the match, more than the total number of places in the stadium, you can set a higher price to get a higher income. However you don't get so high an income compared to extending the stadium.
Reason for the change, apart from making the game more varied and interesting, was saturation of the market with good players at high skills and high wages. Top teams, in many situations, were forced to trade many players to balance their income with expense on wages.
---
zeker wat betreft die wedstrijden lijkt het me een enorme vooruitgang.
Combination play
It might look like this is a little change.... but that's not true. In fact the modification is much bigger than the ticket prices added. As with that change there is a related testing process that took a number of weeks. How do we test? We generate hundred of matches and run them repeatedly. It takes up to half and hour. Than we analyse the statistics we get from the matches like average score, shots on the goal, number of passes, long and short, average pass distance, and dozens of similar stats. We check in the statistics to see if the engine performed close to what we wanted to achieve (usually its not:), view some matches and than make some parameter tuning and engine corrections and then repeat testing.... over and over for weeks. Despite this laborious testing, we are still not sure how the engine will perform in every single match. We have already tested combination play a few seasons ago, but that time it failed and we removed it from the match engine. Hopefully this time it will be a success as it is now a much better balance. Please report bugs on Bugs / Ideas (en) forum with match ID and minute, report bug only if weird situation is repeated at least twice in single match and if it is passing bug - especially if player passed instead of shooting or passed to the wrong player. We are mainly interested in NT matches bugs or with top club teams playing their first team squads. Reported bugs in other situation will make it hard to determine if the player was just low skilled, or the engine generated the mistaken action :]
Ticket prices
We are now allowing you to set your match ticket prices for each stand. Prices are able to be set on your stadium page. How expensive or cheap compared to the default price in the rules you set is up to you. We recommend you set prices depending on the size of the supporters clubs of both teams. The better the teams playing the higher you can expect to put the ticket price and still expect the same number of supporters attending your match. So you would get a higher income. Good club teams may expect even one and a half times bigger (150%) higher incomes on matches than before. Notice that if you set the prices much too high less supporters will come, and you can expect lower income. Same if the price is much too low, more supporters will come, but not so much to compensate for such a low price. You will get the highest income if you set the right price for class of teams playing in the match. Of course, if your stadium is little and you expect many supporters to attend the match, more than the total number of places in the stadium, you can set a higher price to get a higher income. However you don't get so high an income compared to extending the stadium.
Reason for the change, apart from making the game more varied and interesting, was saturation of the market with good players at high skills and high wages. Top teams, in many situations, were forced to trade many players to balance their income with expense on wages.
---
zeker wat betreft die wedstrijden lijkt het me een enorme vooruitgang.
It takes up to half and hour. Than we analyse the statistics we get from the matches like average score, shots on the goal, number of passes, long and short, average pass distance, and dozens of similar stats.
Leuke statistiekjes om ooit eens toe te voegen :) In elk geval mooi dat dit spel wel gewoon doorontwikkeld.
Ticketprijzen zul je dus een beetje mee moeten spelen.
Leuke statistiekjes om ooit eens toe te voegen :) In elk geval mooi dat dit spel wel gewoon doorontwikkeld.
Ticketprijzen zul je dus een beetje mee moeten spelen.