Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[NT] Adameczek(II)
Nenáviděn všemi úděl můj, pán bůh mě ochraňuj :D
Ale je :D. Tím, že jsem proti němu kandidoval jsem naštval jednu půlku národa. Tím co jsem teď udělal jsem naštval tu druhou. Hlavně v klidu :D.
a proto u nas uz asi nebudes mit nikdy uspech:)))
To už říkalo tolik lidí. Moc to hrotíš. Jednou vyhraje ten a někdy zase ten. Hlavní je aby se tu něco dělo. To je můj úkol. :D Kdyby mě nebylo, už by to tu dávno všechno umřelo... :D :D
Ten pocit znám taky, ale z druhé strany a je fakt skvělej.. :D pak té ani neserou sjednane přátelský manažerem před tebou.. :P
jinak sorry za offtopic, ještě rozmyslím koho volit.. :)
jinak sorry za offtopic, ještě rozmyslím koho volit.. :)
Today 2-0 with Slovenija. Any ideas for next friendly? I was thinking of putting players that are a little bit forgotten..like dostalek or kretek:)
(edited)
(edited)
Btw..wenezuela will be in next saturday. They have pretty solid team and their coach is well known for me..I think pretty nice challenge.
Whoever win election will face then bulgaria with u27 players. Good team and occasion to test team that will likely play in u27 championship.
Whoever win election will face then bulgaria with u27 players. Good team and occasion to test team that will likely play in u27 championship.
Dostálek is old and he is not such legend as i.e. René Mergl was. But testing Hulvert before WC would be interesting...
agree, go with players you want them to be in better form.
as for the match. I liked it but have few remarks. Biggest one is a floating midfield in def mid zone, when oponent goes to attack from middle to our defs. I think our mids goes too deep to defensive. I am probably talking about 3rd position from the bottom in tactic scheme. I would prefer them to be one place higher and return to defending only for corners. Also I saw it also when oponent has a throw-in, Kugler was in place of 5th defender. In theory I have nothing against it, but I do not like it with this scheme..
Reason:
- our defenders have quality both defensive and offensive, it seems to me that using our quality mids didnt hit the mark since they just run deep and after we got a ball the only players avialable were attackers and in facts mids are just runing back and forth. We should prefer situation, where after defs get the ball, they will do short pass to mids and they will create the play. I used similar scheme with my club tactics and it was better after the change. It will not hurt that much against better teams and will be lot better against even strength or weaker teams.
Second is, Grosek position should be sweeper sweeper/vanguard before our defense. I do not want him to be too deep - let it be center mid rather then def mid if you like, but when oponent counterattacks from their possition ohe should be always around center mid/defmid to start complicate things in order to help our defense. Again distance from our defense is the key factor. Look at the match, our defense is too often overhelmed by by 3-4 oponent players, our luck is only that our defs outskilled them. Running-forward defense is strong, but can be fragile if oponent can couter it, this should help to be more effective.
Our mids are maybe too deep in offensive zone. When we are trying to make a play from center to offenzive zone and oponent get the ball he get easy counterattack, because nearly nobody left except our defs. I am not sure exactly, but I saw it few times during match.
So in short, I would improve position of mids to be able to: create play from our defense and also to minimalise negative effect from counterattacks. Anyway I like the tactic, this is just my 0,02$ to make it stronger and less vulnerable :)
(edited)
as for the match. I liked it but have few remarks. Biggest one is a floating midfield in def mid zone, when oponent goes to attack from middle to our defs. I think our mids goes too deep to defensive. I am probably talking about 3rd position from the bottom in tactic scheme. I would prefer them to be one place higher and return to defending only for corners. Also I saw it also when oponent has a throw-in, Kugler was in place of 5th defender. In theory I have nothing against it, but I do not like it with this scheme..
Reason:
- our defenders have quality both defensive and offensive, it seems to me that using our quality mids didnt hit the mark since they just run deep and after we got a ball the only players avialable were attackers and in facts mids are just runing back and forth. We should prefer situation, where after defs get the ball, they will do short pass to mids and they will create the play. I used similar scheme with my club tactics and it was better after the change. It will not hurt that much against better teams and will be lot better against even strength or weaker teams.
Second is, Grosek position should be sweeper sweeper/vanguard before our defense. I do not want him to be too deep - let it be center mid rather then def mid if you like, but when oponent counterattacks from their possition ohe should be always around center mid/defmid to start complicate things in order to help our defense. Again distance from our defense is the key factor. Look at the match, our defense is too often overhelmed by by 3-4 oponent players, our luck is only that our defs outskilled them. Running-forward defense is strong, but can be fragile if oponent can couter it, this should help to be more effective.
Our mids are maybe too deep in offensive zone. When we are trying to make a play from center to offenzive zone and oponent get the ball he get easy counterattack, because nearly nobody left except our defs. I am not sure exactly, but I saw it few times during match.
So in short, I would improve position of mids to be able to: create play from our defense and also to minimalise negative effect from counterattacks. Anyway I like the tactic, this is just my 0,02$ to make it stronger and less vulnerable :)
(edited)
Our mids are maybe too deep in offensive zone. When we are trying to make a play from center to offenzive zone and oponent get the ball he get easy counterattack, because nearly nobody left except our defs. I am not sure exactly, but I saw it few times during match.
All tactic has it variations too:). Def/mids can be placed with lower position of course but as you know it depends from opponent set up. If he set mids closer to middle arena and then atts higher he could easily shorten pitch and make fast counterattacks. But slovenija coach has his atts at the middle arena so after their defs take balls they then pass high balls straight to them. Kugler and grosek is pretty fast so they could return in time thats why I allowed them to go a little bit higher in this match.
I am now on the phone so cant write more. When I get to laptop I will write more but thanks for your opinion:). I like it.:)
All tactic has it variations too:). Def/mids can be placed with lower position of course but as you know it depends from opponent set up. If he set mids closer to middle arena and then atts higher he could easily shorten pitch and make fast counterattacks. But slovenija coach has his atts at the middle arena so after their defs take balls they then pass high balls straight to them. Kugler and grosek is pretty fast so they could return in time thats why I allowed them to go a little bit higher in this match.
I am now on the phone so cant write more. When I get to laptop I will write more but thanks for your opinion:). I like it.:)
I will try today to analyze your words
Btw
Someone votes me or should I quit and join mison and look for new adventures?:p
Btw
Someone votes me or should I quit and join mison and look for new adventures?:p