Subject: Hattrick

Idd.

BTW: heb een vraag gesteld op HT-forum, en ondertussen nog eens een klein beetje reclame gemaakt voor Sokker (dat ik Hattrick beu ben, en dat Sokker beter is, mét de link erbij ), alle beetjes helpen ;)

:D

ge zult wel een mailtje krijgen van een mod dat 'als Sokker reclame wil maken, dan moeten ze maar contact opnemen met de HTs' ;)
En ze zien alles van naamvermelding van ander spel als reclame. Ze weten goed genoeg dat HT enkel nog populair is om zijn fora en omdat ze de grootste waren en dus overal hoog staan ;)

Zoltán Oszlánczi
TSI = 770, 19 jaar en 45 dagen.
Is redelijk in vorm, zijn conditie is goed.

Keepen: rampzalig
Verdedigen: goed
Spelmaken: slecht
Vleugelspel: slecht
Passen: matig
Scoren: zwak
Spelhervatten: zwak


wat denk je

ne verdediger en geen Belg ?

haha wat denk je voor hattrick hij sta nu wel te koop

wat ik daarvan denk is dat het een degelijke deftrainée is voor beginners en je er een 100k voor gaat krijgen ;)

ja heb nog paar 17 jarige en 1 ervan is naar goed gegaan

Na een ongelukkige botsing in het strafschopgebied moest Lierse-speler Glen Dewispelaere in de 82e minuut van het veld worden gedragen. Zijn vervanger was Schorsch Dbner.

een belg

dé feature van ht, zijn toch de debiele namen.
(edited)

net dé topper verloren :(

The Rebel Forces
Middenveld uitmuntend (heel laag)
Rechterverdediging uitstekend (heel hoog)
Centrale verdediging formidabel (heel laag)
Linkerverdediging formidabel (laag)
Rechteraanval uitstekend (hoog)
Centrale aanval goed (heel hoog)
Linkeraanval formidabel (hoog)

Fcben
Middenveld uitmuntend (heel laag)
Rechterverdediging uitstekend (heel hoog)
Centrale verdediging uitstekend (hoog)
Linkerverdediging uitstekend (hoog)
Rechteraanval matig (heel hoog)
Centrale aanval formidabel (hoog)
Linkeraanval redelijk (heel hoog)

Uitslag: 3-4

Kvind toch dat een gelijkspel meer op zijn plaats was, en als er al 1 ploeg had mogen winnen, dan was ik het wel geweest. Jammer, daar gaat m'n kans op de titel, maarja, als nieuweling in Ve zou het misschien wel net iets te veel van het goede geweest zijn om meteen de gedoodverfde titelkandidaat te verslaan, ook al was ik (heel lichtjes) beter.

Een 6 op 9 nu behaald, met de 2 grootste titelkandidaten al achter de rug. Het blijft een prachtige seizoensstart, ondanks dit puntenverlies
(edited)

De cijfers spreken, toch wel in mijn voordeel denk ik. Maar speel een gelijkspel

SeMTeX Tjolinge FC
Middenveld briljant (hoog) zwak (heel laag)
Rechterverdediging goed (hoog) goed (heel laag)
Centrale verdediging goed (heel laag) uitstekend (laag)
Linkerverdediging redelijk (hoog) redelijk (heel hoog)
Rechteraanval goed (heel laag) goed (heel laag)
Centrale aanval redelijk (laag) goed (laag)
Linkeraanval goed (hoog) slecht (laag)

Onrechtstreekse vrije trappen
Verdediging matig (heel hoog) matig (heel hoog)
Aanval zwak (heel hoog) zwak (heel hoog)

Type wedstrijd normaal (verborgen)
Tactiek normaal normaal
Tactische vaardigheid (geen tactiek) (geen tactiek)

een gelijkspel met een briljant hoog/zwak laag verhouding in middenveld? :p

idd, triest he
'k had 77% balbezit

7/9 en de titelkandiaten elk 3/9 ...
wel maar 2e

Rating details KMEM'kes Invasion USA
Middenveld goed (laag) redelijk (hoog)
Rechterverdediging goed (hoog) matig (hoog)
Centrale verdediging uitstekend (heel laag) uitstekend (hoog)
Linkerverdediging goed (hoog) zwak (zeer hoog)
Rechteraanval uitstekend (laag) redelijk (heel laag)
Centrale aanval redelijk (hoog) briljant (heel laag)
Linkeraanval redelijk (heel laag) matig (laag)

Indirecte vrije trappen
Verdediging matig (laag) zwak (zeer hoog)
Aanval zwak (hoog) zwak (zeer hoog)

Teammotivatie (Verborgen) Speel het Rustig
Tactiek normaal normaal
Tactiekvaardigheid (geen speciale tactiek) (geen speciale tactiek)


uit de beker

Knap staaltje forum superioriteitsissues..

How Did I Lose???
Geschreven door petebs
How many times people that like to help other users, have to answer to a topic named "How did I lose this game?"? And how many times can they convince the person that asks? Right...

For most authors of these topics, their loss of points will always be random, even though 95% of the times, it is not. So, I'll try to explain here, in a few lines, why the majority of these games are not Random games.

I would also like to thank the user Alex_DeLarge, for his time and share of knowledge.


Everyone that has a good knowledge of HT (or at least sufficient knowledge to mean they’re no longer n00bs), and likes to spend some time in the forums, knows that, on Wednesday and on Saturday, sooner or later, the same old topic will appear: “How did I lose this game?”.

This is one of the most frequently asked questions in Hattrick forums (at least in Portugal we see these a lot), matched only by questions like “How do I get my team in shape?”. In this topic you often see things that aren’t exactly pleasing on the eye, since the manager lost the game that he was sure it would be a 4-0 victory for him… So what do we see when this question is asked?


• Disbelief in the result;
• Incomprehension of the arguments of other managers that try to explain the result;
• Incapacity to read the game facts as they really were;
• Bad mood from the person that opens the topic;
• More incomprehension and incapacity to read the game;
• Announces that the manager will be quitting the game;
• Rudeness to managers that were only trying to help;
• Blaming of the “Swedish” :);
• Egocentricity when it comes to random events in the game: “I have random games everytime!”
• Accusations of cheating, being the helping manager that tried to help, the very cheaters:
• The topic is closed, maybe with a ban or two, and in fairness the author didn’t learn anything, and now he will never come back to the forums to resolve his doubts. To this manager, his loss of points will always be random.

And is the manager right? Can random be used as an excuse for this unpredictable results? Is he the one to blame for all those cup game losses and failed promotions?

The answer, in my opinion, it’s a clear NO. Random cannot have such an important role as the “ignorant” users of Hattrick want to believe. Hattrick is, above all, a game of probabilities, and could never be taken seriously if a truly RANDOM GAME happened in every 10 games of a team, for example.

So, what can we consider random?

First, we have to define exactly what random is, and explain the difference between that and an unpredictable game:

• Unpredictable Result – A game in which the result is more or less explainable, although the loss of points is unfair. This kind of game makes up 97% of the topics opened on this theme;

• Random Result – The so called “1 in a Million” game. It happens less than 1% of the time. However, sometimes there are other results so strange that, to be fair, we should consider a 5% chance for this game to happen.

Bear in mind that, without the use of additional tactics, 35% of goal chances will be from the central area, while 25% represent each side of the attack, leaving 15% for free kicks and penalties.


Let us consider a typical (if there is such a thing) game from the Portuguese VIII Division, that opposes team A and B, with the following ratings:


Team A
MF: weak (high)
RD: inadequate (very high)
CD: weak (very high)
LD: inadequate (high)
RA: passable (high)
CA: poor (very high)
LA: passable (high)

Team B
MF: weak (low)
RD: weak (low)
CD: weak (high)
LD: weak (high)
RA: weak (very low)
CA: weak (low)
LA: poor (very high)

This is the typical game of “How did I lose this game” topics. There’s a far superior team in every sector (except the sector CA-CD), by many sub-levels in each sector. Victory seems assured, yet the final score is 2-2. Rip-of? Random?

Let us analyse what at a first glance can’t be explained:

The first thing we have to do is to look at the midfield. It was won by Team A, but not by much. Here it is the first mistake of most users: Midfield is not everything! It is important, no doubt, but other factors will have a great influence on the final score.

After this analysis, we can conclude that each team should have goal opportunities. However, for Team A, this number can change between 3 and 7 opportunities, while Team B may have between 2 and 6 opportunities. Second big mistake: The number of opportunities varies, it can’t be calculated with precision. Therefore, the weakest team may have more goal scoring chances than the strongest team.

Now, let us analyze the probability of scoring the goal opportunity. Once again Team A has the advantage in this aspect, with a 30% probability of scoring at least 2 goals, and a 20% chance of scoring 3 goals. Team B, on the other side, has a 35% probability of not scoring any goals, so a 2-0 result would, in fact, be possible.

However, the probability of this team scoring a goal is even greater, with a 40% chance, and the probability of scoring 2 goals is still 20%, so a 2-2 result may very well happen. If you add to this the probability of the set pieces, that are not calculated in this article, and you reach the conclusion that 2-3 can very well happen, it’s not random.

And so, with a few calculations, we can see that Team A has a 58% chance of winning the game, 20% of drawing, and 22% of losing. At a first glance one would say that this is a good probability, but really there is a 42% chance of losing points in this game, meaning that in every 10 games, Team A will lose points in almost half the games (4 to 5 games).

Of course anyone can say that the opposing team made much worse ratings than him, and so we would have much more chances of winning, so we feels robbed. But he/she still didn’t get it: You need to have an extremely high probability of winning (I’m talking 90-95%) so, in case you don’t win, we can consider that defeat or draw as a random game.

And never forget: Hattrick is a probability game. As long as there is a 0,01% chance of happening, it may (and eventually will) happen.

Now it’s my turn to ask: Is it so strange to have lost this game?