Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [NT] België - : - Eesti

2009-04-25 12:28:38
just checked it and most of their players were A squad. The winger of the first half was B squad, but that was about it I think ...
Quite disgusting tactics too. As expected: offside ... but SIX defs and 2 defmids :s
2009-04-25 13:34:14
An admin causes them some fear. :p
2009-04-25 13:34:33
ge zij goe bezig korthe!
2009-04-25 13:35:06
6 mans verdediging van die manne , toch een bekke derover :)
2009-04-25 13:45:31
niks mis mee, mannen wilden wrs gewoon eens iets uitproberen
2009-04-25 14:12:26
Amai, sterk resultaat ! Go Langhe !
2009-04-25 16:44:50
Sorry, Belgians, just wanted to see how we could perform like this against a stronger squad (we are 2. because of the strenght of our coaches before). I wanted to try all-Turkey but we just don't have any really nice wingers (Põlluäär is only getting there) and all the defenders are pretty much the same as they were in Borkos' era. We don't even have 2 usable defenders with at least excellent sideskills, that's why we were very weak at the back today.

We also couldn't use every player (had some mails not to play them) but I think it would've been a lot tougher without the red early on, therefore I'm a bit disappointed because I have to try this again some day. :P We still had a lot of chances and were trailing because we gave away a lot of free kicks, that's why I don't think it was that bad. Really, on another day.. :)

Not taking anything away from the result - it's great! Absolutely. I would also be proud of it, no matter what. Still, just wanted your people to know that when you use this victory as a superb achievement in your election speech, they should know that the other party didn't really set winning as a priority.

Cheers.
(edited)
2009-04-25 18:00:36
Why didn't you use Tamkivi? I hoped for a pre-season Tamkivi vs Deroo, because I'm going to meet him in my league......

As for defs...are you serious? There were some definitely good young defs when I was leaving...Miller for example...
2009-04-25 18:24:32
Yes, by your definition, Miller is the only top defender we could have used (at least excellent secos). His Polish owner won't give us the skills anymore, though. :-[

Tamkivi didn't really have the right form, did he? :) I wanted to use only 1 striker, not that I thought it was the best solution.
(edited)
2009-04-25 18:46:30
Haven't checked Tamkivi's form, then you're probably right...

anyway, I would've preferred to play 622 or 631 with 3 central mids instead of winger...would've worked better I think...
2009-04-25 18:50:15
i dont see the point of 6 defs ...
actually, it's quite sad to see
- 2 and more seasons ago, most nt played with 4 defs
- last wc, 541 was one of the most played formations, some 532. 5 defs anyway
- now some nt are testing 6 def tactics ...
2009-04-25 18:53:16
that's just knowing your going to lose anyway, with 6 defenders
they are not trying to win at all...
even if they are much better, play for the win but that's just my opinion..
2009-04-25 19:50:51
His Polish owner won't give us the skills anymore, though. :-[

say that he'll play till you get his stats -> higher risk of getting injuried :p
2009-04-25 19:57:15
and borkos could ask his stats.
2009-04-25 20:50:36
- last wc, 541 was one of the most played formations, some 532. 5 defs anyway

Daar haal je dan blijkbaar betere resultaten mee ?
2009-04-25 20:51:33
Ik ga nu eens proberen met 3 defs spelen en 1 er een beetje voor:)