Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [U21] België U21 - Portugal U21
hoog middenveld werkt gewoon niet met dit soort spelers:)
I will answer the few questions :
to langhe :
1) the midfield : yeah the mid were higher than usual but we are the aggressors and they are the defenders. Imagine how it would have been if we were more defensive.
2) the attack : we were too low, really too low. But I cannot always predict how my opponent will play. Sometimes we are to low (like today) and sometimes we are too high and we have too many offsides. But I take note of that. Maybe I should still play a bit higher because it is true it was sometimes really too low. The strikers lack of technique but Tuerlinckx isn't in great form and the 2 other powerhouse are injured. Cohen should be back for next week.
the throws-in : this is perturbing because the difference between the "game" and the "tactical field" is real. Normally it was planned that Bouchet (the winger) makes the pass to Bare. But Bare was too close from the throw-in line and it was Bare who did the throws-in (and of course with a defender just behind Bouchet).
It wasn't that good.
Another perturbing thing is Bare. He plays on the right and came a lot of time deep inside the left side.
In the end it is the striker in best form that scored the 2 goals of victory. No Emile, you're not dead :)
(edited)
to langhe :
1) the midfield : yeah the mid were higher than usual but we are the aggressors and they are the defenders. Imagine how it would have been if we were more defensive.
2) the attack : we were too low, really too low. But I cannot always predict how my opponent will play. Sometimes we are to low (like today) and sometimes we are too high and we have too many offsides. But I take note of that. Maybe I should still play a bit higher because it is true it was sometimes really too low. The strikers lack of technique but Tuerlinckx isn't in great form and the 2 other powerhouse are injured. Cohen should be back for next week.
the throws-in : this is perturbing because the difference between the "game" and the "tactical field" is real. Normally it was planned that Bouchet (the winger) makes the pass to Bare. But Bare was too close from the throw-in line and it was Bare who did the throws-in (and of course with a defender just behind Bouchet).
It wasn't that good.
Another perturbing thing is Bare. He plays on the right and came a lot of time deep inside the left side.
In the end it is the striker in best form that scored the 2 goals of victory. No Emile, you're not dead :)
(edited)
Hoe kunde nu teleurgesteld zijn als we gewonnen hebben? De zege was verdiend, al had het spel idd beter gekund. Congrats Neo!
disappoint
ik zou het trouwens ook niet weten waarom, jef en cerb precies wel
(edited)
ik zou het trouwens ook niet weten waarom, jef en cerb precies wel
(edited)
Sorry Cerb Sorry Sorry Sorry :'(
I mixed both name :'(
(for the info Cerb asked me if Jolly would play and I said yes thinking about Victoor :'( )
I mixed both name :'(
(for the info Cerb asked me if Jolly would play and I said yes thinking about Victoor :'( )