Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [U21] Algemeen topic
Niets quatch. Heb sinds 2005 3 spelers gehad die ik met lichte blessure heb laten spelen en die toen een nog zwaardere blessure opliepen van 28 , 30 en 32 dagen. Toeval? Ik vin van niet..
Lijkt me trouwens ook logisch/realistisch dat een lichte blessure een zware kan worden als ge hem opstelt.
Lijkt me trouwens ook logisch/realistisch dat een lichte blessure een zware kan worden als ge hem opstelt.
uw nieuwe blessure is gewoon de 'normale' plus het aantal dagen die over was van uw lichte ...
Welja, reden genoeg dus om licht geblesseerde spelers niet op te stellen. Of toch liefst niet mijn spelers als ik mag kiezen
onze fappo is in vorm de laatste weken ... de foute speler opstellen, dit keer een spits op de flank ...
Again...Put a little effort in making the squad...
Also, why would you put a player with 5 defender on the central midfield and a player with 12 defender on the wing? And why don't you use Truyen for example as a defmid instead of playing with Van Eetvelde or Benoot?
Also, why would you put a player with 5 defender on the central midfield and a player with 12 defender on the wing? And why don't you use Truyen for example as a defmid instead of playing with Van Eetvelde or Benoot?
Truyen:
2-x
9-15
9-10
11-10
completely useless in my sokker vision..
no stamina (after 20 mins max he can't run so fast)
pace 9, too low to go vs opponent mids leaving them to much time to move the ball.
9 tec = he should lose to many tackle, and don't stop so well the ball
10 play, he can't move the ball so fast, and opponent mid will reach him takling, and with 9 tec is every time a lost ball
why would you put a player with 5 defender on the central midfield
who's him?
kinet def=10
benoot def=10
if you mean van eetvelde, he's not a mid def, but a player without def task..
he has 2 def mid behind him to protect the defense line, he has only forward task, and with high tec and playmaker he can move the ball really fast and well..
2-x
9-15
9-10
11-10
completely useless in my sokker vision..
no stamina (after 20 mins max he can't run so fast)
pace 9, too low to go vs opponent mids leaving them to much time to move the ball.
9 tec = he should lose to many tackle, and don't stop so well the ball
10 play, he can't move the ball so fast, and opponent mid will reach him takling, and with 9 tec is every time a lost ball
why would you put a player with 5 defender on the central midfield
who's him?
kinet def=10
benoot def=10
if you mean van eetvelde, he's not a mid def, but a player without def task..
he has 2 def mid behind him to protect the defense line, he has only forward task, and with high tec and playmaker he can move the ball really fast and well..
I still don't understand why you use Bockstaele as a wing...
------------------Van Eetvelde
-----Benoot
-Kinet------Bockstaele
is a much more logical choice, if you use the same players. And Truyen is not completely up to date. As far as I know, he has formi pace and since Langhe always trains stamina in between seasons, he might have popped too. I think Truyen is certainly better than Benoot (who is also not up to date)
Van Eetvelde also often had to make tackles, btw. In my opinion, defender is a very important skill for an offensive mid and not so important for a winger.
------------------Van Eetvelde
-----Benoot
-Kinet------Bockstaele
is a much more logical choice, if you use the same players. And Truyen is not completely up to date. As far as I know, he has formi pace and since Langhe always trains stamina in between seasons, he might have popped too. I think Truyen is certainly better than Benoot (who is also not up to date)
Van Eetvelde also often had to make tackles, btw. In my opinion, defender is a very important skill for an offensive mid and not so important for a winger.
Congrats with the group victory... First half was really good today!