Subject: [NT] ALL I CAN DO FOR YOU! (And u for me..)

Obviously everyone has their own idea tactics; however, for example, their wing, spite was not a phenomenon, it went off several times a defender who had to chase too often.

- no mid backup.. Only 5 players on the bench. If my wingback got a red card, another player play in his position.
- I'm not agree with u. Flamini'd scored 3/4 goals.
- I'm not agree with u. U train another NT, so I can not explain more. I just tell you that the wing has not always done the wing and that the first time there were two tactics.

Obviously everyone has their own idea tactics; however, for example, their wing, spite was not a phenomenon, it went off several times a defender who had to chase too often.

I'm agree, but in my opinion the problem is my wingback. Not 17/18 form. Not my favourite wingerback. Against Colombia I show you how i can stop their wings. Now I have to try other tattics, other arena, other player's position.

Why the hell did you play with your own (not so good) defender? Volder is really not NT material...

becuse he has 18 on form, 13 on tec. Today 've not more good defender with high tec and IMHO their strikers have high def.
Jo Verbovsek played against Uruguay. Maybe not a good defender (as Volder), but the best player I had to deploy.

I have three defenders injured. I'm not happy when I use my player. I have not used Morales because also Smurf had a lot of injuries. I Use and choose the players that, at that time, and against that opponent give me more guarantees

(edited)

You could've used Deprez. He has unearthly form which is good enough to compensate. Or you could've used Bergh for the whole match. Using Volder is unacceptable!!

Depres has the same skills as Volder (def-pace-tec), but Deprez has 2 yellow cards and 16 on form.
I need Bergh on Bench. Volder has a better height and a better BMI.

What is the problem? If I play with a striker that has 16 in technique and not deploy a striker that has 18 in technique no protest?
I played against Pilipinas not against Germany.
The tactics, the men and how to protect players from the disqualifications are my responsibilities.

someone don't love my high defender's line but after 3 round (we played against Uruguay, colombia and Pilipines) we have the best defender line. Maybe my problem are strikers, no defender's line.

Btw, it's a long road..

Deprez is way better than Volder, 16 form is not distinguishable from 18 form on the pitch. Height and BMI are bullsh*t and if Deprez gets a suspension during this match, he will miss the match against Malta. No big loss there. You are just making excuses. Just admit that the only reason you are using Volder, is because it is your player!!

Bergh and Deprez were both better alternatives than Volder and I don't even know Volder's skills, so there might even be some more better ones in the database.

iMHo Height and BMI, are not bullsh*t. Database is not the bible.
Many coach, like me, prefer not updatare their players in the database because they do not want to run the risk of seeing them injured when they play with the national.

I do not have any advantage to make my player play a game in the national team. The player is not on sell, not in TL, not in TA. No advantage for me.

I do not understand your problem. I play a lot of players that you did not play. Each CT chooses and accepts the responsibility for his choices.

Ps. Malta is not Pilipinas. For me it is important to have Deprez available for the next game.

I saw the match now and your tactic was terrible. The opponent's wing was completely free all the time. Your strikers were way too low (and yet you still keep complaining about Flammini). And you played 30 minutes with a defender/defmid on the wing. Everyone can make mistakes in the tactic, but the fact that you can't even admit that it was a bad tactic is terrifying. If you play like this against better opponents, you will get your ass kicked.

I'm not even sure why you have been elected. You really show a lot of incompetence, I feel.

Ok, now you have been clear, and now I understand the reason of your silly accusations. I thought that after the election was being played all together and not against others who were fighting among ourselves. I do not think it is correct to reveal the skills of the players.
Your contribution does not seem constructive. Do not like the way I play. You think that I'm a goat. OK. We'll see if the goat will qualify for the World Cup and if the world will do well. All deserve a chance and the opportunity to play it at best.

Look, I told you what I thought was wrong with the match. Seems pretty constructive to me. And I never called you a 'goat' (whatever that would mean). I also did not reveal skills of players..

I just have the feeling you don't even care about the NT that much and you care even less about the opinion of others.

17-8
17-17
17-6


17-15
17-12
14

yes, I prefer def-mid as winger. It's not a mistake, It's a choice, my choice.

I won, I had two goals in three games. I got zero goal against the strongest team. Are you sure that I do not know what I do?

Flamini is important for the national team. Flamini has a bad BMI. Flamini scores ever, but Flamini mistake many goals easier.
Flamini is in the right place, 1vs1 against the keeper, but he missed the goal. I do not think it's my fault. Each game has its own story. Flamini will make 3 goals against Malta. We'd be happy for our score.

If I read your words seems to me to be a goat, incompetent and indifferent. I spend a lot of time thinking about our national team. I do not think I deserve your criticism.

This is a goat!

I don't know whose skills those are. I can understand that you want a player with some defender on the wing, but I think Mannaerts' tech and passing are too low for this position. Maybe Roelandts would've been a better choice then.

I agree you could've scored more goals. But that does not mean that your tactic was good. You won this match purely on the quality of your players. It needs to improve a lot! I just don't want you to be happy with the performance. You can however be happy with the result.

You have some bad luck with the form of certain players, but you still can use better players than Volder (and even Verbovsek is a bit too weak to be used). Using a better player with lower form is often the better option, imo.

(and I know what a goat is, I just did not know what you meant by that)

Bonaventure Roelandts injured 22 days...