Subject: [RK]borkos007

One can call it as he wants, for me it's one of many tactical tricks which is very helpful :)

Thats just poor midfield tactics from Spain. They literally dont give any more chances to their MIDs than to pass the ball straigh to the forwards.

I'd like to see you making their mid more chances to pass while playing with 4 defs, 3 centre mids, def mid in situation when there is a throw in.

The other central midfielder should be much more closer to the throw in section to put more pressute there and to give more possibilites for other players to pass. Thats one of the key things in throw-ins in my oppinion. You have to make your team play from one side to the other, you can't just let some players hanging around on the other side of the field. Especially if you know that the other team has wide wing defenders who cover the wings so that there's no point in over-field passes.

and empty center field to let through passes go? :D

you can't just let some players hanging around on the other side of the field

I can't agree, it's very often useful as many users tend to move their defence on the side where the ball is - and that means lots of free space on the other side.

And you say that especially when there are wing defs...yes, but you never know it before the game ;-) and even if there were other CM's near - what would it change? they would get a pass but the play wouldn't move forward.
(edited)

Against borkos' Poland who publically declares that he's so proud of his 5 DEF tactics? How can you not think that you have winger DEFs agains you...

And what do you mean let empty center field to let through passes go? That screenshots show empty central field in Spains tactics and that's what I'm saying is wrong. The central midfielder who's on the other wing should be there, but that's only my view on tactics. But clearly in this case my view would have been more helpful.

The play might not directly move forward but the midfielders would have more time to think and the strikers would have more time to run to the onside line (since you so proudly declared that they have no time... thats the point of this thing, an extra midfielder and a pass to him would give them that time).

So nex time, before you start laughing so wrestnly over someone who dares to question your view, then think over what you and the other person are actually saying.

You were talking in general, not in terms of playing against me ;-)

You have to make your team play from one side to the other, you can't just let some players hanging around on the other side of the field.

The guy on the other wing isn't useless - he is just man marked ;-)

I must agree that they would get the time to get back in the line. Still, as I've written before, it's more useful when the ball is near the penalty area and the decision after the throw in is to make a cross in. People generally don't place any players few meters before the penalty area, what in my opinion is a huge mistake.

And I'm not laughing wrestnly, I just imagined how that would look like and I greened, couldn't stop it - sorry :P

Group G:
1. Eesti 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2. New Zealand 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3. Portugal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4. Moldova 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5. Panamá 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6. Misr 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Easy group to win. A chance to have many competitions like bettings, u21, u22 etc. :)

Hope to see Augusto and Joel on the field at the same time:)
(edited)

Hehe would be definitely nice for you :)) I was hoping for the battle of my u21 strikers in the Belgia-Italia semifinal, unfortunately one got injured...:(

btw. - the second best def with highest wage is...Alonen! In whole sk :) Only one guy being better than him at the moment...

who is better than Alonen?

Usun et see teie pikk inglisekeelne vestlus siin taktikate üle küll valmis hääli juurde ei too... kuna keegi ei viitsi neid pikkasi tekstisi lugeda...

only this guy

@Karru
could you mind to write in English, when writing to me?

It was to oliver tbh...

Ma arvan, et vestlus on läinud huvitavamaks, paremaks kui paar hooaega tagasi.

---