Subject: Rahvuskoondis Borkos007 juhtimisel

Uh. Give a rest...

He lost. It happens. You dont need to repeat it for 68 times now. Yes, tactical side has been dissapointment,but still , there would have been only few managers, who could help us further from that sh*t that Stam made.

I still consider Borkos as the best pick for NT coach place. David B , Helin ore any other big geniuses wouldn't have done better.

It's almost best that He could do. There have been good sides to. Small loss against poland for an example. Than You guys were soo happy about Borkos,but now,when luck turns to something bad, You are all whining on him. Great . No wonder that there are only few awesome managers who would like to coach Estonia. Im sure that it's because of this whine.

Too slow. But looks nice, might get to NT if talented...:)

So what should it look like? No mids on the wing when there is a throw in, or what because I really don't understand what you're after...maybe the def mid should go forward so the mid wasn't alone? Come on ;)

There must be 2 mids on the wing when the ball is there, because one must make the throw in and second must receive it. How do you imagine 1 player out there? ;)

i actually meant that you play too little mids near throw ins, hrvatska game showed really well that throw ins were just meant for losing posession. even if you dont wanna play more mid's you can make 2 mids play throw ins better at this time they were clearly too far away from each other and every throw somebody came from redcoats and took the ball away and sometimes the player meant to be played with was so far away that the ball never made it to him......

Its not that i could do something better but i'm pointing out the stuff that cought my eye, maybe you get some ideas from this maybe not but at least i have done my share.

Otherwise keep up the hard job!

Just wondering if this guy is good for NT? 459835

Basically my Jaanson and Luug are equal or better - depends on which skills you prefer.

Well,but friendlyes are for testnig. NT level is different level. You can play a little bit wider,because pace levels are higher and they will reach. But this time he just played too wide.:)
(edited)

Even more mids out there? :p 2 is enough...when defending = two defend. When attacking - one passes from throw in, second gets the ball and can pass to centre, high wing or attack. Just watch Poland - Italy - these are REALYY bad throw ins[polish teams tactic] :)). Thanks for comment, I might try something like that :) Generally now I'm going to make few new tactics, completely new, and see how it goes...the one against Sweden might be awfull though :p

The U21 WC would be quite nice I think, there would be a chance to achieve something really nice[though...watch Italy - Belgie today...:O] but the midfield isn't really good...Oidermann would be able to make a huge difference and make the play but with this form...

@Vilpu
Yeh, for reserve...
(edited)

Saying it last time - try 3-5-2 and 3-4-3

3 defenders are good against weak oponents. I want to see Borkos playing against Nederlands with 3 DEF. He isn't that stoopid tough.

Here is a nice 3DEF tactic at World Cup...

finland has rather good 4-4-2 i'd say

Just try it. You said Eesti has one of the best defence in SK, so use this opportunity smartly

Seems solid. :)

maybe he his talking about canada ? :)

Canada have 5 DEFs

and finland had 4 so uin that match noone played 3 defs:D borkos made a mistake:D

Well. But You can consider both of these formations as 3DEF :)