Subject: [NT] Sharoni123

Good Luck :)

Hi...don't you think that U21 should open a new period playing with 16,17 and 18 y.o that could be potential NT players after 3 season?

mmm
Ill write about what you wrote in your topic as well.

1) we have a database already for all our players , including youngsters to follow their progress (more in answer 3)
2) we have a topic with what manager is training what is our closed forum (more in answer 4)
3) our coummunity comparing to Italy is a "little" small , Italy has over 3500 users , we have 164 , Italy had i think about 50-100 great pulls each week , we have about 10 great pulls each season..
4) Since our community is small and we dont have much seasons in the game yet in Latvija , most managers realy dont have the option (financaly) to buy potentials yet , the ones who do have are trying / training , and they are our base.
5) About the question here , playing with 16-18yr which dont have enough level now will give us nothing , you dont know which player will be trained for sure for many season (at least in most of the cases , teams can be banned / leave the game , or any other stuff) and you cant build on them , you must build on the best players aged U21 (means 19-21 players as well) more and give some minutes as you see for younger players , but playing 16-18 will only mean we will be crushed in every match and gain nothing since we cant predict the future of this players.

Thanks
:-)

yes what do you say is right, but I think that if a 20/21 player is strong he must play in NT, your U21 should be a school where grow promises...obvious that many young can be loose on the way, but who arrive at 21 could be a great players.

Playing a friendly in the club a young player takes 92% of training,
Playing a friendly in the club and a match in U21 takes 100% of training.
therefore 8% on plus at week.
15*8%=120% at season.

A player of 20 year who play in U21 could play 2 seasons for a total of 240%...
but a player of 16 year plays at least 5 seasons for a total of 600%.

Player that plays in friendly dosnt get the same training as a player that played in an official match - league or cup , so its realy not 92% training , its less , i would say more like 80-82% training from what i see in my players , and players aged 16-18 will most likly wont be in official matches because of their low level.
And i still dont think we should use the U21 NT as its nothing and play potentials that are weak and get crushed in every match.
This U21 NT is still representing Latvija and i belive no one wants to see a team representing him gets high loses for maybe nothing if this potentials will be lost.
Dont see how its worth it.

Ok, this is your opinion, in Italy we have arrived at this conclusion in a discussion in a sokker forum.
Loose isn't good but you should think in perspective.
However I'll support Latvija!!!! :-)))

ahh.. i see you allready answered to all of my questions in first post so i'll leave you alone :]

Good luck in elections! ;)

hehe
Thanks mate
;-)

How can you explain the result in your match today?

XD

hehe
Luck , luck , luck , injured my best mid , luck , luck and..... luck
;-)

He will pay for this......

Congratz Sharoni :)

Thanks mate
:-)
And thanks for all the voters !
:-)

What week are we going to have friendly?


And congrats :)
(edited)

Thanks , congrats too ;-)

Week 4....

Congrats mate:)
good luck. and no injuries and red cards;)