Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT]Filippazzo - Ita
I am looking at your 4-2-4 situation (the most likely in my opinion)
I cannot understand few things -
1. Why do you keep midfield so empty in your 4-2-4 situation?
2. Why do you use 2 scorers if you attack on flank only and if you don't have anywhere near a balanced fight?
3. How do you imagine getting out of your defense if you have none in midfield to give ball? (flanker does not count because he could be too far away or in offside)
4. What happens at left side through-in if it is in opponents side of field? Who will be able to take that through? I see only one midfielder there. And if other midfielder goes for it than does he leaves opponents midfielder alone in right side?
5. Does making our only 2 normally working midfielders against opponents 2 mids is a wise thing if you know that ours will face a loosing battle?
Because as I see it - yes this tactics in basics are quite ok at least in a first glance, but If you really made it exactly like this that I would guess that scorers would not get ball what-so-ever because we wont be able to get out of our defense line. Defenders and defensive midfields will be only able to give 2\3 passes to scorers that will be stopped in an instant by opponents defenders. That would ofcorse mean that opponents can start their attack all over again. the rest 1\3 of passes could reach flank midfielder - that would be other story, he has chances to deliver the ball deep into enemy defense lines - on that part I agree with you.
I might not be the best tactician aswell but I would do following - possibly 541 tactics (or 451 if I feel lucky). Defenders line I would place high up in hope of offsides and tight ground to play ball. Defence is quite ok in your drawing and I agree - 2 flank defenders and 3 inside. Though midfield would be a little different. I would keep the flank midfield ofcorse but very high as scorers - why? Because if opponents defenders get to that midfielder than the attack is over and beleave me - opponent coach would be waiting for flank attacks. The rest of midfield would be 2 defensive midfielders and one in center who should be free from anyone. He can then pass ball to flanker or scorer. (hopefully wont pass scorer much because that is a loosing battle). So here is the tactics in drawing
--------SC--------
----------------MID
--------------------
--------MID-------
--------------------
----MID---MID----
--------------------
def-def-def-def-def
You are welcome to prove me wrong by answering my questions and you can also say why your tactics will work better than mine and what are biggest threats in mine tactics.
I cannot understand few things -
1. Why do you keep midfield so empty in your 4-2-4 situation?
2. Why do you use 2 scorers if you attack on flank only and if you don't have anywhere near a balanced fight?
3. How do you imagine getting out of your defense if you have none in midfield to give ball? (flanker does not count because he could be too far away or in offside)
4. What happens at left side through-in if it is in opponents side of field? Who will be able to take that through? I see only one midfielder there. And if other midfielder goes for it than does he leaves opponents midfielder alone in right side?
5. Does making our only 2 normally working midfielders against opponents 2 mids is a wise thing if you know that ours will face a loosing battle?
Because as I see it - yes this tactics in basics are quite ok at least in a first glance, but If you really made it exactly like this that I would guess that scorers would not get ball what-so-ever because we wont be able to get out of our defense line. Defenders and defensive midfields will be only able to give 2\3 passes to scorers that will be stopped in an instant by opponents defenders. That would ofcorse mean that opponents can start their attack all over again. the rest 1\3 of passes could reach flank midfielder - that would be other story, he has chances to deliver the ball deep into enemy defense lines - on that part I agree with you.
I might not be the best tactician aswell but I would do following - possibly 541 tactics (or 451 if I feel lucky). Defenders line I would place high up in hope of offsides and tight ground to play ball. Defence is quite ok in your drawing and I agree - 2 flank defenders and 3 inside. Though midfield would be a little different. I would keep the flank midfield ofcorse but very high as scorers - why? Because if opponents defenders get to that midfielder than the attack is over and beleave me - opponent coach would be waiting for flank attacks. The rest of midfield would be 2 defensive midfielders and one in center who should be free from anyone. He can then pass ball to flanker or scorer. (hopefully wont pass scorer much because that is a loosing battle). So here is the tactics in drawing
--------SC--------
----------------MID
--------------------
--------MID-------
--------------------
----MID---MID----
--------------------
def-def-def-def-def
You are welcome to prove me wrong by answering my questions and you can also say why your tactics will work better than mine and what are biggest threats in mine tactics.
Cik reizes man būs jāsaka, lai tauta atturās no spama un uzbraucieniem svešzemju kandidāta topikā. Lūdzu izturēties ar savstarpēju cieņu gan pret savējiem, gan ārzemniekiem, lai arī cik jauni, nepieredzējuši vai smieklīgi tie šķistu. Ja kandidāts nepatīk - ignorē. Arī slikta reklāma ir reklāma un tiek pelnīti bonusiņi.
Un par valodu runājot, šeit ir atļauta latviešu, kā arī angļu (internacionāla), tāpēc vēlēšanu kampaņas laikā ārzemju lietotājiem ir tiesības izteikties angliski. Cita lieta būtu, ja viņš sāktu savā dzimtajā valodā runāt, bet itāliski šķiet te vietējie menedžeri mēģina runāt, ne jau kandidāts.
It is allowed here to write either in latvian or english, no other language is allowed. NT candidate filippazzo communicates in english so any question or comment here must be in english. Spam and insulting has no place here.
It is allowed here to write either in latvian or english, no other language is allowed. NT candidate filippazzo communicates in english so any question or comment here must be in english. Spam and insulting has no place here.
I think our NT candidate Filippazzo didn't answer to ozzy's question:
And if you wont be able to win these elections, would you be interested in helping our NT anyways as an assistant, because as I see it - you have the willing to do it but you don't have much experience that is very much needed in this game. Only by making lots and lots of tactics and seeing them work you can understand the bigger picture and make tactics without faults.
Here are my questions, but you don't need to answer if it is too personal:
How do you earn for living IRL?
Personal life - are you single?
What about hobbies and sports?
And if you wont be able to win these elections, would you be interested in helping our NT anyways as an assistant, because as I see it - you have the willing to do it but you don't have much experience that is very much needed in this game. Only by making lots and lots of tactics and seeing them work you can understand the bigger picture and make tactics without faults.
Here are my questions, but you don't need to answer if it is too personal:
How do you earn for living IRL?
Personal life - are you single?
What about hobbies and sports?
I said it's impossible for me make a perfect tactic without know player skills. If our MID are better or worse than opponents, or if you have a very good off-mid to think he will do a good job( so for a wing) or the type of scrores you have.
Adding that the graph are only a static representation of the tactic and we can say that what i represented is all and nothing.
It's much important for me how tactics are interpreted. Two coach with the same system can play very differently.
Entering into the specific of your questions, many answers at yours questions are in this 2 match:
Chile- Dominician Rep.
Columbia- Chile
The two tactics basically have the same arrangement than mine even if all three are different about interpretation.
In this matches we can look how only two mid can do a very good job even if his number is fewer than opponents ( respectively against 3 and 4 mid!).
If they are supported by an hight defense line who seek off-side( not like chile, is too extreme) they have to cover less field zone and they are nearer at your scores to try a penatrive passes that with 2 scores will be more efficent.
The 2 Mid also have to getting up when we are attacking and not only stay a little bit over defense line.
The first goal of Columbia result from a mid pass.
We can also bring the wing in a lower position than scores to seek more passes for him from defender or mid. That can be good to research the 3vs 2 explained in the graph. Because when the opponent flank defender go up to tackle our wing, he can make a penatrive passes for scores or try to trick him and go for a 3 vs 3.
Basically i think that Chile is weak in defensive flank( with that system). For this i have throught to play with 2 wings too, but not with a off-mid expecially if he'isn't a great off-mid.
Look Hayastan - Chile 0:9, where hayastan play with 2+1 Mid but with 2 scores. His off.mid didn't take ball.
Knowing the player's skills i could think to arrange the left score as an half-wing( if he have right skills)
Dom. Rep. mid and left score did a great job and i don't thik they were better than opponents.
Showing you all the moviment i would have to post an editor tactic video but i think that the match up mentioned are enought.
I like your tactic, it is good for me, but i don't like so much play with only 1 scores (it's a personale conviction) and your conbination idea is a little bit complicated for me.
Defender/def-mid --> off-mid.---> wing --> trick --> score --> goals?
How many time during a macth do you hope this combination could be successful? 3, maybe 4? Without considering that you have less possibility for penetrative pass only with one score.
I don't know if mine is better than yours ( or maybe more lucky ) or vice versa, only the field can say that. I know that there are 2 good different systems and there isn't one better than other...they are simply different ;)
Winning a match there will be a set of factor that will have to be positive....not alway the best tactic win ( and here come again the lucky).
Have a good afternoon ;)
(edited)
Adding that the graph are only a static representation of the tactic and we can say that what i represented is all and nothing.
It's much important for me how tactics are interpreted. Two coach with the same system can play very differently.
Entering into the specific of your questions, many answers at yours questions are in this 2 match:
Chile- Dominician Rep.
Columbia- Chile
The two tactics basically have the same arrangement than mine even if all three are different about interpretation.
In this matches we can look how only two mid can do a very good job even if his number is fewer than opponents ( respectively against 3 and 4 mid!).
If they are supported by an hight defense line who seek off-side( not like chile, is too extreme) they have to cover less field zone and they are nearer at your scores to try a penatrive passes that with 2 scores will be more efficent.
The 2 Mid also have to getting up when we are attacking and not only stay a little bit over defense line.
The first goal of Columbia result from a mid pass.
We can also bring the wing in a lower position than scores to seek more passes for him from defender or mid. That can be good to research the 3vs 2 explained in the graph. Because when the opponent flank defender go up to tackle our wing, he can make a penatrive passes for scores or try to trick him and go for a 3 vs 3.
Basically i think that Chile is weak in defensive flank( with that system). For this i have throught to play with 2 wings too, but not with a off-mid expecially if he'isn't a great off-mid.
Look Hayastan - Chile 0:9, where hayastan play with 2+1 Mid but with 2 scores. His off.mid didn't take ball.
Knowing the player's skills i could think to arrange the left score as an half-wing( if he have right skills)
Dom. Rep. mid and left score did a great job and i don't thik they were better than opponents.
Showing you all the moviment i would have to post an editor tactic video but i think that the match up mentioned are enought.
I like your tactic, it is good for me, but i don't like so much play with only 1 scores (it's a personale conviction) and your conbination idea is a little bit complicated for me.
Defender/def-mid --> off-mid.---> wing --> trick --> score --> goals?
How many time during a macth do you hope this combination could be successful? 3, maybe 4? Without considering that you have less possibility for penetrative pass only with one score.
I don't know if mine is better than yours ( or maybe more lucky ) or vice versa, only the field can say that. I know that there are 2 good different systems and there isn't one better than other...they are simply different ;)
Winning a match there will be a set of factor that will have to be positive....not alway the best tactic win ( and here come again the lucky).
Have a good afternoon ;)
(edited)
I think our NT candidate Filippazzo didn't answer to ozzy's question:
And if you wont be able to win these elections, would you be interested in helping our NT anyways as an assistant, because as I see it - you have the willing to do it but you don't have much experience that is very much needed in this game. Only by making lots and lots of tactics and seeing them work you can understand the bigger picture and make tactics without faults.
I have to think about that...i hope to win elections.
1- I took a economy degree last april
2- no
3- I play soccer in an amateur league of F.I.G.C. (one league under promozione- that you see in sokker too- , i have played in it too).
(edited)
And if you wont be able to win these elections, would you be interested in helping our NT anyways as an assistant, because as I see it - you have the willing to do it but you don't have much experience that is very much needed in this game. Only by making lots and lots of tactics and seeing them work you can understand the bigger picture and make tactics without faults.
I have to think about that...i hope to win elections.
1- I took a economy degree last april
2- no
3- I play soccer in an amateur league of F.I.G.C. (one league under promozione- that you see in sokker too- , i have played in it too).
(edited)
I don't know player skills aswell - I just think as they all are equal strength.
"Knowing the player's skills i could think to arrange the left score as an half-wing( if he have right skills)"
And what skills would you need?
"Defender/def-mid --> off-mid.---> wing --> trick --> score --> goals?"
No. Defender -> any free mid (because if you have only 2 than both of them can be "busy") -> side mid -> high ball to scorer.
"How many time during a match do you hope this combination could be successful? 3, maybe 4?"
Situation I wrote above could be common. The idea was so that scorer don't get direct passes because look at their defense players. Do you think that if you even have 2 scorers they will be able to outrun those defenders?
And there is always the best tactics and then there is good tactics :) I am not saying that I have the best :)
OK enough torturing you. Good luck in elections.
(edited)
"Knowing the player's skills i could think to arrange the left score as an half-wing( if he have right skills)"
And what skills would you need?
"Defender/def-mid --> off-mid.---> wing --> trick --> score --> goals?"
No. Defender -> any free mid (because if you have only 2 than both of them can be "busy") -> side mid -> high ball to scorer.
"How many time during a match do you hope this combination could be successful? 3, maybe 4?"
Situation I wrote above could be common. The idea was so that scorer don't get direct passes because look at their defense players. Do you think that if you even have 2 scorers they will be able to outrun those defenders?
And there is always the best tactics and then there is good tactics :) I am not saying that I have the best :)
OK enough torturing you. Good luck in elections.
(edited)
I would need more technique and playmaker (maybe passing hightest than "very good") and maybe less striker. Pace as hight as possible.
Do you think that if you even have 2 scorers they will be able to outrun those defenders?
They have to outrun opponents without ball, getting penetractive pass. They have to play near off-side not go in front of opponents with ball, so it will be impossible.
It's possible sometimes that one score take advantage from defender tackle. Or when opponents goalkeeper rejects an our score shoot other can take advantage shooting again.
This could be decisive to score a goal.
Thanks...afther this extra work maybe vote for me XD.
Do you think that if you even have 2 scorers they will be able to outrun those defenders?
They have to outrun opponents without ball, getting penetractive pass. They have to play near off-side not go in front of opponents with ball, so it will be impossible.
It's possible sometimes that one score take advantage from defender tackle. Or when opponents goalkeeper rejects an our score shoot other can take advantage shooting again.
This could be decisive to score a goal.
Thanks...afther this extra work maybe vote for me XD.
I would thank all the people who voted me ! Thanks a lot!
I'm sure that Sharoni will do a great job with yours NT. I wish you and him the best!
I wanted to do this before, but i was on vacation this week.
See you soon....maybe next season :P
Filippazzo
(edited)
I'm sure that Sharoni will do a great job with yours NT. I wish you and him the best!
I wanted to do this before, but i was on vacation this week.
See you soon....maybe next season :P
Filippazzo
(edited)
You didn't do bad at elections - grats for that. With your little experience I think it is a very good result - good luck in whatever you'll be doing next and see you around. :)
I'm just organizing an international friendly league. If someone would like take part in the tournament is welcom!!
I hope to start next wednsday....
this is the link to sign in...
"Tutti Pazzi International League".
Bye
(edited)
I hope to start next wednsday....
this is the link to sign in...
"Tutti Pazzi International League".
Bye
(edited)
Hi boys and ladies :P
How are you?
I'm here to renovate my candidature for yours NT.
I think that my know-how about this game now is much more than last years.
I bring my team in the Serie D and I improved my score each season. In the last season my team was 2th and next years i would try to go to Serie C!
I think that can be a record for all the italian community that an 2008' team can be fight to conquer the Serie C.( I'm not sure but i think that there isn't a team founded in the 2008 that play in Serie C, maybe only few. My team was founded at the end of 2008).
Some of you know me and my ideas from the last candidature. Who don't konw can read some old post in this discussion.
I hope to win the election this time....Sharoni have done a good job in this years but i think that is time to change!!
New motivations and new ambitions for a brighter future.
Vote for me!!!
See you soon! :))
P.s. For questions and other i'm here ;)
(edited)
How are you?
I'm here to renovate my candidature for yours NT.
I think that my know-how about this game now is much more than last years.
I bring my team in the Serie D and I improved my score each season. In the last season my team was 2th and next years i would try to go to Serie C!
I think that can be a record for all the italian community that an 2008' team can be fight to conquer the Serie C.( I'm not sure but i think that there isn't a team founded in the 2008 that play in Serie C, maybe only few. My team was founded at the end of 2008).
Some of you know me and my ideas from the last candidature. Who don't konw can read some old post in this discussion.
I hope to win the election this time....Sharoni have done a good job in this years but i think that is time to change!!
New motivations and new ambitions for a brighter future.
Vote for me!!!
See you soon! :))
P.s. For questions and other i'm here ;)
(edited)
And what kind of change you can offer? Do you still follow Latvia NT all season or just on election time?