Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Myth or Fact?

  • 1
2008-04-14 14:28:19
Just seem to have loads of weird questions and rumours heard from other users and forum? Not sure whether to believe or not? Post it here for us to discuss!
2008-04-14 14:28:26
Myth or Fact?

"Theoretically speaking, juniors with great stats at young age can be assumed to have great talent."

e.g.
unsatisfactory stamina,
adequate pace,
solid technique,
average passing,
tragic keeper
unsatisfactory defender
adequate playmaker
solid striker

20 yr. Talent? Predicted to be 4.5 to 6 wks.

Comment.
2008-04-15 12:33:01
Sort of.

What it means is they must have reached a fairly high level which means they musth ave had some talent. But it's far more complicated than that.

A good 34 weeks could come out as formidable but he'd be very untalented (8+ weeks per pop).

There's really no way to tell talent unless the owner has a screenshot of them in the junior school (even then it COULD be edited).
  • 1