Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Myth or Fact?
- 1
spankst3r [del] to
All
Just seem to have loads of weird questions and rumours heard from other users and forum? Not sure whether to believe or not? Post it here for us to discuss!
Myth or Fact?
"Theoretically speaking, juniors with great stats at young age can be assumed to have great talent."
e.g.
unsatisfactory stamina,
adequate pace,
solid technique,
average passing,
tragic keeper
unsatisfactory defender
adequate playmaker
solid striker
20 yr. Talent? Predicted to be 4.5 to 6 wks.
Comment.
"Theoretically speaking, juniors with great stats at young age can be assumed to have great talent."
e.g.
unsatisfactory stamina,
adequate pace,
solid technique,
average passing,
tragic keeper
unsatisfactory defender
adequate playmaker
solid striker
20 yr. Talent? Predicted to be 4.5 to 6 wks.
Comment.
Sort of.
What it means is they must have reached a fairly high level which means they musth ave had some talent. But it's far more complicated than that.
A good 34 weeks could come out as formidable but he'd be very untalented (8+ weeks per pop).
There's really no way to tell talent unless the owner has a screenshot of them in the junior school (even then it COULD be edited).
What it means is they must have reached a fairly high level which means they musth ave had some talent. But it's far more complicated than that.
A good 34 weeks could come out as formidable but he'd be very untalented (8+ weeks per pop).
There's really no way to tell talent unless the owner has a screenshot of them in the junior school (even then it COULD be edited).
- 1