Subject: U21 National Team

well. i see. and i didn't say everyone is "lazy" . but i think 2-3 of all managers here have time to be a successful NT. I agree , that Nin has done a great job and i really appreciate all his work.

But i mean why aren't a few managers who comments the game? it's enough to write a row of words? that's a work of 1 minute. that's why i think, many guys here aren't interested in.

;)

"thank you . i didn't read anything from you. what do you think about your NT :) "

Look through the archives ;) You'll have to go back to 2006.

What I think about it now is we have the best u-21 GK in the known universe. I havn't checked that so don't quote me.

---

I don't understand your english. What are you trying to say?

sorry. i mean like you said you didn't check it. and i believe you're not very interested in the NT-stuff .

but why . ?

:)

This guy has had enough airtime.

Moderators?

He's ok. He might have something to add and i'm interested to see what he makes of the national team games.

sorry that i say what i think ;)

ok

You're the boss.

Executor is a very suspicious person ;) He was talking before about the fact he was NT manager in the past.

Like Nin said the more people that comment on the NT games the better. As there are always new innovations in the way people play you might also come across something we haven't seen. Most comments on the NT come from those of us who have managed it so it would be interesting to get a new unbiased viewpoint.

I've mentioned it elsewhere but i'd really like to test out the Brazilian formation with the advanced wingbacks at some point. If they hadnt changed the combination passing it might have been possible but not now. I dont know what the next innovation will be but until changes are made it'll require 5 defenders. Maybe playing 2 massively advanced wingers, that'd be almost impossible to defend against but defensively you're vulnerable.

I'm not sure we really have the players to have advanced wing backs- we might be better off flat. The 2 winger thing might go a bit better for us- I think Coyne is suspect playing in midfield so pushing him up as a wing might be the best idea. On the other side it would be any of 5 I guess.

We have at least 2 players who can play that formation in Foxton and Shevlin and i think there is another. Its definitely not a formation i'd test out against anyone with wingers anyway.
Coyne has been disappointing. He doesnt quite have have the defensive ability of the other players but he's in there to attack. Sometimes he does a good job but not always. I think he got the assist against Belgium this weekend. As a winger, nope i dont think so anymore. He doesnt have the technique to beat anyone and other players will soon overtake him. I like him in that attacking hole behind the strikers but i'm going off that formation after the Sweden game.

If we're in a position to drop Coyne then we're doing well :) I think our best chance for Spain and Denmark will be to go as basic as possible in our defs and mids and picking for pace and defending. If it means leaving out passers like Coyne I think it's still the right thing to do.

We certainly could drop Coyne without too much trouble. I'm not going to overcomplicate any formation. I know exactly what i've got planned for Bolivia and Spain. I'm not looking any further ahead than that for now.

any chance someone could give me a link to a program that changes the language. i got uipdated U21 player data but its in italian and im guessing the rest of them are in mad languages too. i could hazard a guess on some of the words, but i dont wanna be doin that :P

accettabile =?

also this stuff

dostateczna kondycja niedostateczny bramkarz
beznadziejna szybkość bardzo dobry obrońca
beznadziejna technika bardzo dobry rozgrywający
celujące podania dobry strzelec

:S
(edited)